ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1492

Exposure-Response Analyses for Upadacitinib Efficacy and Safety in Ankylosing Spondylitis – Analyses of the SELECT-AXIS I Study

Mohamed Ismail1, Ahmed Nader 1, Insa Winzenborg 2, In-Ho Song 3 and Ahmed Othman 1, 1AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 2AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany, 3AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA, North Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: axial spondyloarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster II: Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis & Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Upadacitinib, a selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 (JAK1), is currently being evaluated for the treatment of several autoimmune disorders, including axial spondyloarthritis (axial SpA).  In the SELECT-AXIS I study (NCT03178487), upadacitinib 15 mg once-daily (QD) demonstrated favorable efficacy in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients who had an inadequate response to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and who were naïve to biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs. The purpose of this analysis was to a) explore the relationship between upadacitinib exposures and several AS efficacy endpoints and safety parameters to support dose selection for future studies and b) compare upadacitinib plasma exposures in subjects with AS to subjects with rheumatoid arthritis to assess disease-related differences in upadacitinib pharmacokinetics (PK).

Methods: The analyses included data from 187 subjects in the SELECT-AXIS I study. Subjects were randomized to receive upadacitinib 15 mg QD (n=93) or matching placebo (n=94). PK samples were taken at pre-defined visits and modeled using a population approach. Within the evaluated dose, exposure-response quartile plots were created to assess the relationship between upadacitinib average plasma concentrations and the probability of achieving Week 14 efficacy endpoints (ASAS 40, ASAS 20, ASAS partial remission [PR])  or experiencing adverse events/relevant changes in laboratory variables (lymphopenia [Grade 3 per CTCAE or higher], infection, decreases in hemoglobin).

Results: Upadacitinib plasma concentrations (Table 1) and PK parameters (drug clearance and volume of distribution) in subjects with AS were similar to those previously observed in subjects with RA in the SELECT-BEYOND and SELECT-NEXT studies.

Subjects in the active treatment arm had statistically significant higher response rates for ASAS 40, ASAS 20, and ASAS PR compared to those in the placebo arm. However, within the single active treatment arm there were no clear exposure-response relationships between increasing upadacitinib average concentrations and the probability of achieving the evaluated efficacy outcomes, suggesting achieving the plateau of response. With increasing upadacitinib exposure, there was an increase in the percentage of subjects experiencing decreases of hemoglobin of ≥ 1 g/dL from baseline; with no subjects having ≥ 2 g/dL decreases of hemoglobin from baseline. There were no upadacitinib exposure-dependent increases in percentage of subjects experiencing lymphopenia or infection. There was a single observed case of Grade 2 neutropenia in a subject receiving active treatment and no observed cases of serious infections.

Conclusion: Upadacitinib pharmacokinetics are similar in subjects with AS and RA. Upadacitinib 15 mg QD dose is predicted to maximize efficacy in subjects with AS. Overall, the results of this analysis support  selection of the upadacitinib 15 mg QD dose for further evaluation in future studies in AS/axial SpA.

Table 1. Predicted median average upadacitinib plasma concentrations within a dosing interval -Cavg- in AS and RA subjects receiving upadacitinib 15 mg QD.


Disclosure: M. Ismail, AbbVie Inc., 3; A. Nader, AbbVie Inc., 1, 3; I. Winzenborg, AbbVie Inc., 1, 3; I. Song, AbbVie, 3, 4; A. Othman, AbbVie Inc., 1, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ismail M, Nader A, Winzenborg I, Song I, Othman A. Exposure-Response Analyses for Upadacitinib Efficacy and Safety in Ankylosing Spondylitis – Analyses of the SELECT-AXIS I Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/exposure-response-analyses-for-upadacitinib-efficacy-and-safety-in-ankylosing-spondylitis-analyses-of-the-select-axis-i-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/exposure-response-analyses-for-upadacitinib-efficacy-and-safety-in-ankylosing-spondylitis-analyses-of-the-select-axis-i-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology