ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2104

Exercise For Ankylosing Spondylitis: It′s Still Important

Janet Millner1, John Barron2, Kirsty Beinke3, Rachael Butterworth4, Briony Chasle5, Lindsay Dutton6, Margaret Lewington7, Errol Lim4, Tony Morley8, Jennie O'Reilly9, Kathryn Pickering10 and Jane Zochling1, 1Menzies Research Institute Tasmania, Hobart, Australia, 2Eastwood Physiotherapy, Adelaide, Australia, 3Adelaide West Pilates Physiotherapy, Adelaide, Australia, 4BJC Health, Sydney, Australia, 5South East Sydney Area Health Service, Sydney, Australia, 6Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia, 7Hydrohealth, Brisbane, Australia, 8Physio Plus, Lismore, Australia, 9Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Australia, 10Curtin University, Perth, Australia

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and exercise

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: ARHP Orthopedics, Low Back Pain and Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation Sciences

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: Previous systematic reviews [1] and international consensus [2] have agreed that exercise is beneficial in ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and this concept is widely supported by patient groups. However, there is a paucity of information to guide exercise prescription.  There is a need for more information about different types of exercise, how long, to what intensity and how often it should be performed for maximal improvement. Results from studies on spa therapy and hospital in-patients may not be directly transferrable to other countries where most exercise therapy is prescribed on an outpatient basis. Finally, improvements in disease management with biological medication have raised questions about the relevance of exercise as a core component of management. This collaborative project, combining evidence with expertise, was therefore established to develop practical recommendations to guide Australian exercise prescription for individuals with AS.

Methods: Ten Physiotherapists participated in discussion rounds, to determine a set of eight key topic areas, using modified Delphi methodology. A systematic literature review was conducted for each topic, and a range of evidence analysed for level, quality and relevance to the clinical question and local setting.  Ten recommendations were developed, based on the integration of available evidence and expert opinion. The importance of the recommendations was validated by surveying both patient and health professional groups.

Results: A total of 202 papers were allocated to the key topic areas, the majority being surveys, cohort and case-controlled studies. Effect sizes were calculated for 20 randomised controlled trials, the range being 0.12-4.96. Exercise recommendations were developed for the following areas: assessment/evaluation; monitoring of exercise prescription; safety; biological therapy; ankylosing spondylitis-specific exercise; physical activity levels; setting; dosage and compliance. The average Strength of Recommendation was 9.0/10 (range 8.79-9.3) for patients and 9.5/10 (range 9.2-9.8) for health professionals. Valuable patient feedback was obtained regarding the relationship between health professional assessment / monitoring and compliance/ dosage. 

Conclusion: Although insufficient evidence was found to recommend one type of exercise over another, the group concluded that other factors, such as targeted exercise, safety, dosage and compliance were of equal priority, and that exercise prescription remains important (and is additive) for those patients also receiving biological therapy. Widespread dissemination of the recommendations will support appropriate exercise prescription as a key component for optimal patient outcomes.

References: [1]  Dagfinrud H, Hagen KB, Kvien TK. Physiotherapy interventions for ankylosing spondylitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 1 2008            [2] Zochling J et al (2006). ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis.  Ann Rheum Dis 65: 442-452


Disclosure:

J. Millner,
None;

J. Barron,
None;

K. Beinke,
None;

R. Butterworth,
None;

B. Chasle,
None;

L. Dutton,
None;

M. Lewington,
None;

E. Lim,
None;

T. Morley,
None;

J. O’Reilly,
None;

K. Pickering,
None;

J. Zochling,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/exercise-for-ankylosing-spondylitis-it%e2%80%b2s-still-important/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology