ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1530

Evaluation of the Possible Different Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 Infection with Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors or with Rituximab in Rheumatic Patients

Simón Ángel Sánchez-Fernández1, Luisa Marena Rojas Vargas1, Leticia Del Olmo Pérez2, Paula Virginia García Morales1, Adela Alía Jiménez1, José Antonio Carrasco Fernández1 and Sandra Masegosa Casanova3, 1Hospital La Mancha Centro, Alcázar de San Juan, Spain, 2Hospital Nuestra Señora del Prado, Talavera de la Reina, Spain, 3Hospital General de Tomelloso, Tomelloso, Spain

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Anti-TNF Drugs, COVID-19

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Infection-related Rheumatic Disease Poster (1530–1564)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: To assess whether two different biological therapies (BT), tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) and ritixumab (RTX), are related to a different course and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with rheumatic diseases.

Methods: Observational and retrospective multicenter study that includes patients under follow-up by the rheumatology services of Hospital La Mancha Centro, Hospital Nª Sª del Prado and Hospital de Tomelloso, and who received some BT from at least 3 months prior to the beginning of the COVID19 pandemic until March 2021. Sociodemographic, clinical and treatment variables were collected through digital medical history, as well as the presence of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (by nasopharyngeal RT-PCR, rapid antigen or antibodies IgG tests) and its posterior evolution. The development of pneumonia and the need for hospital admission, the need for ventilatory support, refractoriness to corticosteroids (CS), absence of development of IgG antibodies against the virus, higher WHO clinical progression scale and the exitus were considered worse evolution and greater severity. These evolution variables were compared between the patients who received TNFi versus others and also between who received RTX versus others.

Results: In the 3 hospitals, a total of 372 patients with rheumatic diseases received BT during follow-up, of which 68 patients (18.3%) had SARS-CoV-2 infection, with a mean age of 54.8±13.8 years (54.4% women and 45.6% men). The most frequent diagnoses were inflammatory spondyloarthropathy (39.7%), rheumatoid arthritis (32.3%) and psoriatic arthritis (11.8%), and the BT administered were TNFi (66.2%), RTX (13.2%) and IL17 inhibitors (5.9%) (table 1). The mean time of BT administration was 54.9±46.4 months.

Of the patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, 21 (30.9%) developed pneumonia, 17 (25%) suffered hospital admission and 34 (50%) required some treatment (of which 9 (13.2%) were initially refractory to CS treatment and 6 (8.8%) required ventilatory support). The mean time of hospitalization was 25.1±30.5 days and the mean of the WHO clinical progression scale was 2.8±2.1, with 2 dead patients (2.9%). At the end of the follow-up, 9 patients (13.2%) had not developed IgG antibodies against the virus.

In the group TNFi compared to the others TB, there was a lower percentage of patients who developed pneumonia and hospitalization, had a lower score on the WHO clinical progresión scale and a shorter hospitalization time, with all patients developing SARS-CoV-2 IgG after infection. No patient in this group died (table 2).

In the RTX group there was a higher percentage of SARS-CoV-2 infection (37.5%) than in others (17%); also, the patients with RTX had a higher percentage of development of pneumonia and hospital admission and had a higher score on the WHO scale, with no developing of SARS-CoV-2 IgG during follow-up in any of them. One patient in this group died (table 3).

Conclusion: In our rheumatic patients under treatment with TB there has been a different evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, having been better and less severe in patients with TNFi and worse and more severe in patients with RTX.


Disclosures: S. Sánchez-Fernández, None; L. Rojas Vargas, None; L. Del Olmo Pérez, None; P. García Morales, None; A. Alía Jiménez, None; J. Carrasco Fernández, None; S. Masegosa Casanova, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sánchez-Fernández S, Rojas Vargas L, Del Olmo Pérez L, García Morales P, Alía Jiménez A, Carrasco Fernández J, Masegosa Casanova S. Evaluation of the Possible Different Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 Infection with Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors or with Rituximab in Rheumatic Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-the-possible-different-evolution-of-sars-cov-2-infection-with-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitors-or-with-rituximab-in-rheumatic-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-the-possible-different-evolution-of-sars-cov-2-infection-with-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitors-or-with-rituximab-in-rheumatic-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology