ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2378

Evaluation of the EULAR/ACR 2012 Classification Criteria for Polymyalgia Rheumatica: Comparison of the New Algorithms with and without Ultrasound to the Formerly Used Criteria

Sandra Balser1, Wolfgang Hartung2, Emmanuelle LeBras1, Boris P. Ehrenstein2, Martina Müller3 and Martin Fleck2, 1Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Asklepios Klinikum Bad Abbach, Bad Abbach, Germany, 2Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Asklepios Clinic Bad Abbach, Bad Abbach, Germany, 3Clinic for Internal Medicine I, University Clinic Regensburg, Regensburg

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Classification criteria and polymyalgia rheumatica

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Vasculitis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivity of the algorithms with and without ultrasound of the EULAR/ACR 2012 Classification Criteria for Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) to the former criteria in a retrospective single center study.

Methods:

All patients newly diagnosed with PMR at our tertiary rheumatology center between 01/2011 to 06/2012 were included in this retrospective study and analyzed whether the EULAR/ACR  2012 Classification Criteria for PMR with and without ultrasound as well as the formerly used PMR criteria (Bird & Wood’s, Chuang & Hunder’s, Healey’s, Jones & Hazelman’s) were fulfilled. All patients with suspected PMR underwent physical examination, questionaires, laboratory analysis, ultrasound examination of joints and an organ staging to exclude other conditions mimicking PMR (mostly laboratory analysis, chest X-ray and  abdominal ultrasound examination).

Results:

PMR was established as a new diagnosis by a rheumatologist of our center in 35 patients between 01/2011 to 06/2012. The average age was 66.4 +/- 8.8 (mean +/- standard-deviation) years. 60.0% of those 35 patients were female. The average ESR before treatment was 43.0 +/- 24.6 mm/1h, the average CRP 43.8 +/- 31.6 mg/l, the average duration of morning stiffness 88.7 +/- 59.0 min. 82.9 % had hip pain or limited range of motion, 91.4 % had normal values for RF and ACPA and 34.3 % had no other joint involvement. We found that the sensitivity of the EULAR/ACR  2012 classification criteria for PMR without ultrasound was 88.6 %, the sensitivity of the algorithm with ultrasound was 82.9 %. We did not detect any patient fulfilling the classification criteria with ultrasound but not the criteria without ultrasound. The sensitivity of the formerly used criteria was 82.9 % for Bird & Wood’s, 40.0 % for Chuang & Hunder’s, 77.1 % for Healey’s and 82.9 % for Jones & Hazelman’s criteria.

Conclusion:

The results demonstrate a higher sensitivity of the novel EULAR/ACR criteria compared to the previous PMR classification criteria. However, ultrasound findings did not contribute to the higher sensitivity observed in our cohort of recent onset PMR patients.


Disclosure:

S. Balser,
None;

W. Hartung,

Abbott Immunology Pharmaceuticals,

5,

Pfizer Inc,

5;

E. LeBras,
None;

B. P. Ehrenstein,

Abbott Immunology Pharmaceuticals,

5,

Pfizer Inc,

5,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

5;

M. Müller,
None;

M. Fleck,

Abbott Immunology Pharmaceuticals,

5,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

5,

Pfizer Inc,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-the-eularacr-2012-classification-criteria-for-polymyalgia-rheumatica-comparison-of-the-new-algorithms-with-and-without-ultrasound-to-the-formerly-used-criteria/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology