ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1545

Evaluation of the Adherence to Recommendations for Tnfα Blockers Use and Its Impact over 5 Years of Follow-up in Early Axial Spondyloarthritis. Data from the DESIR Cohort

Clementina López-Medina1,2, Maxime Dougados3, Eduardo Collantes-Estévez4 and Anna Molto5, 1Rheumatology Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital/ Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba (IMIBIC)/ University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain, 2Rheumatology Department, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France, 3Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France, 4Rheumatology service, IMIBIC/Reina Sofia Hospital/University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain, 5Hôpital Cochin, Department of Rheumatology, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Anti-TNF therapy and spondylarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Several recommendations have been published for the use of TNFα blockers (TNFb) in patients with axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA). However, there is only sparse data on the adherence to these recommendations in daily clinical practice and the long-term impact of adhering to them. In this study, we aimed: a) to describe the adherence to the 2006 and 2016 ASAS/EULAR recommendations for TNFb initiation and continuation; b) to evaluate the impact of the adherence to these recommendations over 5 years of follow-up.

Methods: Data from the early axSpA patients from the DESIR cohort (first 5 years of follow-up) were analysed. We evaluated the adherence to 2006 and 2016 ASAS/EULAR recommendation for: a) TNFb initiation (patients were considered adherent if they initiated a TNFb when they met the conditions to do so according to recommendations or did not initiate a TNFb when conditions were not met) and; b) TNFb continuation (considering only those patients who initiated TNFb). Predictive factors and the impact of the adherence to these recommendations over 5 years were explored by multivariate logistic regression and mixed models with random effects, respectively.

Results: Out of the 708 patients included in the analysis, 440 (62.15%) and 389 (54.94%) were adherent to 2006 and 2016 recommendations for TNFb initiation, respectively. Patients adhering to 2006 recommendations for TNFb initiation were more frequently male [49.5% vs. 40.7%, OR 1.45 (95%CI 1.07-1.98)] and had more frequently a high level of education (university studies) [62.0%, vs. 53.7%, OR 1.43 (95%CI 1.05-1.95)] against patients not adhering. Patients adherent to 2006 and/or 2016 recommendations for TNFb initiation showed significantly lower levels in BASFI, SF-36 (mental and physical components) and in the number of days of sick leave over the 5 years of follow-up [10.7 ± 44.1 vs. 19.4 ± 58.4 days, p<0.001, in adherent vs. non-adherent patients for 2016 recommendations, respectively].

Among the 258 patients who initiated TNFb over follow-up, 232 (93.93%) continued the treatment. Among these, adherence to TNFb continuation recommendations was observed in 47.37% and 49.39% of patients, for 2006 and 2016 recommendations, respectively. Better outcomes over 5 years of follow-up were found in the group of patients adhering to recommendations for TNFb continuation (Table 1).

Conclusion: This study suggests that adherence to recommendations in the initiation and continuation of TNFb leads to better long-term outcomes in terms of quality of life and sick leave.

Table 1. Impact of the adherence to recommendations for TNFb continuation over 5 years of follow-up.

2006 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TNFb CONTINUATION

2016 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TNFb CONTINUATION

Adherence to 2006 rec. for continuation

n = 117

No adherence to 2006 rec. for continuation

n = 130

p-value1

Adherence to 2016 rec. for continuation

n=122

No adherence to 2016 rec. for continuation

n = 125

p-value1

BASFI over 5 years (0-100)

26.3 (22.1)

36.9 (22.7)

<0.001

27.1 (21.9)

36.6 (23.2)

<0.001

SF-36 mental component over 5 years (0-100)

42.0 (11.7)

39.6 (11.4)

0.002

42.1 (11.6)

39.4 (11.5)

0.010

SF-36 physical component over 5 years (0-100)

41.5 (9.3)

36.6 (8.6)

<0.001

41.1 (9.3)

36.8 (8.8)

<0.001

Sick leave over 5 years (days)

20.9 (57.7)

31.8 (76.5)

0.030

21.6 (59.7)

31.6 (75.7)

0.042

1Mixed model for adherence vs. no adherence.

All results are presented as mean and Standard Deviation (SD)


Disclosure: C. López-Medina, None; M. Dougados, Abbvie, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, UCB, Merck, Roche, BMS UCB, 2,Abbvie, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, UCB, Merck, Roche, BMS, UCB, 5; E. Collantes-Estévez, None; A. Molto, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

López-Medina C, Dougados M, Collantes-Estévez E, Molto A. Evaluation of the Adherence to Recommendations for Tnfα Blockers Use and Its Impact over 5 Years of Follow-up in Early Axial Spondyloarthritis. Data from the DESIR Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-the-adherence-to-recommendations-for-tnf%ce%b1-blockers-use-and-its-impact-over-5-years-of-follow-up-in-early-axial-spondyloarthritis-data-from-the-desir-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-the-adherence-to-recommendations-for-tnf%ce%b1-blockers-use-and-its-impact-over-5-years-of-follow-up-in-early-axial-spondyloarthritis-data-from-the-desir-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology