ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 189

Evaluation of Rheumatology Lectures By Clinical Students in a Nigerian Medical School: Learning from the Learners

Akpabio Akpabio1, Mayowa Owolabi2, Victor Umoh3 and Olufemi Adelowo4, 1Internal Medicine, University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria, Uyo, Nigeria, 2Department of Medicine, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria, Ibadan, Nigeria, 3Internal Medicine, University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria, 4Arthrimed Specialist Clinic:The Arthritis Centre, Lagos, Nigeria

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Evaluation, Medical school, rheumatic education and trainee

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Education Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

 

There is a disparity between the enormous burden and the knowledge of rheumatic disorders among doctors and this is partly traceable to inadequate undergraduate rheumatology training. The situation is worse in sub-saharan Africa and Nigeria in particular where only 10 out of 30 medical schools teach rheumatology. To bridge the gap, specialist rheumatology residents are increasingly being utilized. Currently, there is no known student-based evaluation of rheumatology teaching effectiveness in Nigeria.

This study aims to identify the most and least enjoyable lectures preferred by the students, the proportion of students able to identify rheumatic conditions after the lectures as well as evaluate rheumatology teaching effectiveness using the augmented Stanford Faculty Development Program Questionnaire (aSFDPQ).

Methods:

All 134 4th to 6th year medical students in the University of Uyo medical School, South-south Nigeria were asked to evaluate their rheumatology lectures using a self-administered questionnaire that included the likert-scale (aSFDPQ) instrument.  Each class received about 3 one hour long didactic lectures during their 16-week medicine rotation.  Mann whitney U test was used for ordinal data with p<0.05.

Results:

A 94% response rate was obtained from 126 participants. 78 were male (61.9%). 63 students (50%) chose rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as their best topic because it was well explained (52.4%). 42(33.3%) cited spondyloarthropathies (SpAs) as their worst topic because it was difficult(30.1%). Twenty six students (20.6%) identified a rheumatic condition before the lectures compared with 57 (45.2%) after the lectures representing an increase of 24.6% (p=0.001).

The mean aSFDPQ score was 3.76±0.47. Highest scoring domains were: learning climate (4.03) and teacher’s attitude (4.0). The least domain was Evaluation (3.39). Mann Whitney U domain values ranged from (1647.5<U<1869.5), (0.257<p<0.990) with no significant differences by gender (p=0.825) or class (p=0.162). The mean global teacher rating was 74.64±13.65 (range 40-100).

Conclusion:  

Rheumatoid arthritis was most enjoyed while spondyloarthritis was least understood by our students. There was a 24.6% increase in the proportion of students able to identify rheumatic conditions after the lectures. Although global teacher rating was good (74.6%), resident teaching effectiveness was suboptimal as assessed by total aSFDPQ score <4.0. There is an urgent need for formal pedagogic training to improve rheumatology teaching effectiveness in Nigeria.

 

 

Table 1: Teaching skill evaluation of Rheumatology Resident

 

S/N

 

No. of items

Mean

SD

Minimum

Maximum

p value

1

Learning climate

8

4.03

0.57

2.00

5.00

0.257

2

Control of session

7

3.68

0.63

1.43

5.00

0.426

3

Communication of goals

8

3.61

0.64

1.50

5.00

0.475

4

Promoting understanding and retention

8

3.87

0.63

1.38

5.00

0.988

5

Evaluation

7

3.39

0.80

1.00

5.00

0.990

6

Feedback

7

3.57

0.69

1.00

5.00

0.372

7

Promoting self-directed learning

8

3.73

0.60

1.63

4.88

0.823

8

Teacher’s knowledge

8

3.94

0.75

1.60

5.00

0.577

9

Teacher’s attitude

7

4.00

0.65

1.43

5.00

0.392

 

SFDPQ (domains 1-8)

58

3.73

0.48

1.84

4.75

0.904

 

aSFDPQ (all domains)

65

3.76

0.47

1.79

4.78

0.825

 


Disclosure: A. Akpabio, None; M. Owolabi, None; V. Umoh, None; O. Adelowo, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Akpabio A, Owolabi M, Umoh V, Adelowo O. Evaluation of Rheumatology Lectures By Clinical Students in a Nigerian Medical School: Learning from the Learners [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-rheumatology-lectures-by-clinical-students-in-a-nigerian-medical-school-learning-from-the-learners/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-rheumatology-lectures-by-clinical-students-in-a-nigerian-medical-school-learning-from-the-learners/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology