ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1217

Evaluation of Post Fracture Management in Males at a Veterans Affairs Health System

Nicola Berman1, David Smith2, Virginia Pike3, Craig Tenner4, Michael Pillinger1 and Stephen Honig1, 1Rheumatology, New York University School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, New York, NY, 2School of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 3Medicine/Rheumatology, New York University School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, New York, NY, 4New York University School of Medicine, Internal Medicine, New York, NY

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: fractures, osteoporosis and prevention

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease – Clinical Aspects and Pathogenesis Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

The worldwide incidence of hip fractures in men is rising, and by 2050 is projected to increase by 310%. Increased hip fracture rates may be due to the number of undiagnosed, and therefore untreated, cases of osteoporosis. Established coordinated models for fracture care aim to improve treatment of osteoporosis following fragility fractures, and their implementation has been associated with reduction of subsequent fractures. However, these models vary and have not been uniformly adopted as a standard of care. The aim of this study was to assess osteoporosis management patterns in males with fragility fractures, using a VA system to identify an appropriate population of males at risk for osteoporosis and fractures.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective chart review using the VA Computerized Patient Record System. All patients who underwent bone densitometry (DEXA) between 2011 and 2016, and therefore presumed to be at potentially high risk for osteoporosis and fractures, were identified. Subjects were then stratified into two subgroups: those who had DEXA scans ordered in response to a fragility fracture (subgroup 1), and those who suffered a fragility fracture following their first DEXA (subgroup 2). To identify the impact of treatment on subsequent fractures, post-fracture management was evaluated in both groups. We assessed whether patients were treated following their fracture, whether they sustained a recurrent fracture, and what percentage of treated patients sustained subsequent fractures compared to the percentage of untreated patients who sustained subsequent fractures. Data was collected by three investigators, following a validated algorithm.

Results:

From among 45,000 patients with active records in the study time period, 1848 patients had undergone DEXA. Manual review of records for these 1848 patients identified 485 who had experienced a fragility fracture, including 170 of the 485 patients (9%) who had DEXA scans ordered in response to a fracture (subgroup 1). Overall, 68 (40%) of subgroup 1 patients subsequently suffered a recurrent fracture. 51 (30%) patients in subgroup 1 were treated for osteoporosis following their fracture; of these, 11 (23%) suffered a recurrent fracture, compared with 54 of 119 untreated patients (46%). Further, we evaluated post-fracture care in 315 patients who suffered a fragility fracture after a DEXA was obtained (subgroup 2). 22 of these patients (7%) were on treatment at the time of their initial fracture. Overall, 78 of 315 patients (25%) suffered a second, recurrent fracture. 198 (63%) were initiated on treatment following their first fracture. Among those receiving treatment, 26 of 198 (13%) suffered a recurrent fracture, compared with 28 of the 117 (24%) who did not receive treatment.

Conclusion:

Our data confirms the ability of treatment to reduce the risk of primary and secondary osteoporotic fractures in men, but underline that the number of male patients actually treated in response to DEXA and fracture is well below that mandated by available guidelines. Physicians should be educated on appropriate management of osteoporosis following fractures and an established model of care following fragility fractures may be helpful in this setting.


Disclosure: N. Berman, None; D. Smith, None; V. Pike, None; C. Tenner, None; M. Pillinger, None; S. Honig, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Berman N, Smith D, Pike V, Tenner C, Pillinger M, Honig S. Evaluation of Post Fracture Management in Males at a Veterans Affairs Health System [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-post-fracture-management-in-males-at-a-veterans-affairs-health-system/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-post-fracture-management-in-males-at-a-veterans-affairs-health-system/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology