ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 620

Evaluation of Patients from the Non-Biologic Arms of Inflammatory Arthritis Clinical Trials Identifies Several Predictors of Remission, As Well As, Distinct Responder Subgroups

Brian Tom1 and Deborah P.M. Symmons2, 1Biostatistics Unit, Medical Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Disease Activity, remission and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The RA-MAP consortium is a UK flagship industry-academic partnership investigating clinical and biological predictors of disease outcome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: One RA-MAP workstream investigated clinical predictors of remission by collation of patient-level data from non-biologic arms of academic- and industry-sponsored clinical trials, completed since 2002, evaluating therapies in early inflammatory arthritis and RA. Anonymised data on key baseline and follow-up variables were requested and amalgamated. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of remission at 6 months, as defined by DAS28-ESR. Initial models considered separate effects of potential predictors after adjusting for age, gender, disease duration, race and treatment arm. Multivariate models were built with variables important at initial screen and with low percentage of missing values.  Latent class mixed models were used to characterise disease activity over time, adjust for potential predictors and introduce random effects, and to cluster trajectories that may identify clinically important sub-populations. Both Akaike and Bayesian information criteria were used to decide on number of clusters.

Results: 19 trials were received, comprising 3555 patients with over 30,000 baseline and follow-up records. The non-biologic arms included treatment with placebo, intramuscular steroids, methotrexate or other DMARDs, or methotrexate in combination with other drugs. 78% of patients were female, 86% white and 72% rheumatoid factor positive. Mean age at onset (SD) was 46.7 (13.9) years. Mean age (SD) and median disease duration (IQR) at entry were 52.8 (12.8) years and 3 (1-9) years respectively. Mean baseline DAS28-ESR, 28-swollen and tender joint counts (SDs) were 6.4 (1.1), 12 (6) and 14.7 (7.2). Remission rate, 6 months from entry, was 11% (95%CI 9.8%-12.3%). In the final multivariate logistic model, remission at 6 months was predicted by being white, male, younger, never smoked, RF negative, methotrexate naïve at entry, randomised to methotrexate singly or in combination, better functional health and lower levels of baseline disease activity (Table 1).  Latent class mixed modelling suggested patients could be clustered into sub-populations that included fast improver and non-responder groups and one or two intermediate classes – a slower improver group and a possible sub-population that improved in the first 6 months then showed no further improvement.

Conclusion: Through this novel partnership, the RA-MAP project has confirmed several known factors related to non-biologic induced remission. The remission rate of 11% provides a benchmark for non-biologic arms of future RA trials. The potential to stratify RA patients into distinct disease activity trajectories was demonstrated and may become the basis of personalising treatment choices.

Table 1: Logistic regression for remission

Predictors

log(Odds Ratio)

Standard Error

p-value

Age at Entry, years

-0.0177

0.006

0.0037

Gender

Male v Female

0.7661

0.1668

<0.0001

Disease Duration, years

-0.0157

0.0193

0.4142

Race

White v Rest

1.1430

0.3585

0.0014

Treatment Arm

DMARDs v Placebo

Methotrexate v Placebo

Methotrexate + Other Drugs v Placebo

Intramuscular Steroids v Placebo

0.4770

0.6842

0.9306

-0.1648

0.4958

0.3468

0.4110

0.4340

0.3360

0.0485

0.0236

0.7042

Smoking Status

Current Smoker v Never Smoker

Ex/Not Current Smoker v Never Smoker

Not Collected v Never Smoker

-0.7288

-0.4899

-1.0718

0.3226

0.2636

0.2974

0.0239

0.0631

0.0003

DAS28-ESR at Baseline

-0.2803

0.0866

0.0012

Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), mm/hr

-0.0082

0.0038

0.0302

Rheumatoid Factor Positivity

Yes v No

Unknown v No

-0.3600

-0.1175

0.1661

0.7292

0.0302

0.8719

Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)

-0.5049

0.1337

0.0002

Methotrexate History Status

On Currently v Naïve

Previously On v Naïve

-1.9309

-0.4215

0.3150

0.3229

<0.0001

0.1918

 

 

 

 


Disclosure: B. Tom, None; D. P. M. Symmons, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tom B, Symmons DPM. Evaluation of Patients from the Non-Biologic Arms of Inflammatory Arthritis Clinical Trials Identifies Several Predictors of Remission, As Well As, Distinct Responder Subgroups [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-patients-from-the-non-biologic-arms-of-inflammatory-arthritis-clinical-trials-identifies-several-predictors-of-remission-as-well-as-distinct-responder-subgroups/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-patients-from-the-non-biologic-arms-of-inflammatory-arthritis-clinical-trials-identifies-several-predictors-of-remission-as-well-as-distinct-responder-subgroups/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology