Session Information
Title: Health Services Research, Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Innovations in Health Care Delivery
Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)
Background/Purpose: The National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) 2008 guidelines recommend treatment for postmenopausal women (PMW) and men ≥ 50 if the T-score is ≤-2.5 at the hip or spine and in patients with osteopenia (T-score -1.0 to -2.5) if the WHO FRAX® 10-yr fracture risk is ≥3% for hip or ≥20% for major osteoporotic fractures. We evaluated treatment initiation in patients after DXA and compared treatment by rheumatologists to non-rheumatologists.
Methods: The Cleveland Clinic DXA registry was linked with the patient’s electronic medical record using Explorys Inc. PMW and men ≥50 in the registry between 7/2009 and 12/2012, who were anti-osteoporosis medication (AOP) naïve, and had at least one office visit in the years pre and post-DXA were included. New use of AOPs; bisphosphonates, teriparatide, denosumab, raloxifene, calcitonin, and estrogen started within 90, 180, and 365 days post-DXA were collected through 2/2013. Subjects who did not exceed each post-DXA time period were not included in the analysis. Subjects were stratified into 6 groups based on T-score (osteoporosis or osteopenia); FRAX® 10-yr risk of major osteoporotic fracture or hip fracture, ≥20% and/or ≥3% (high-risk) or <20% and <3% (low-risk); and treatment by a rheumatologist or non-rheumatologist. Results are presented as % difference in treatment starts. Group comparisons were made using chi-square with p≤0.05 demonstrating statistical significance.
Results: Study subjects had a mean age of 70.9 (SD 10.5) and 80.8% (3456/4280) were female. The difference in treatment starts at 90, 180 and 365 days after initial DXA for rheumatologists and non-rheumatologists are presented in Table 1. The groups were osteoporosis at either spine or hip and FRAX® high-risk; osteoporosis and FRAX® low-risk; osteopenia and FRAX® high-risk. Rheumatologists were compared to non-rheumatologists. Treatment would be recommended for all 6 groups based on NOF guidelines. Rheumatologists started significantly more patients on AOP than non-rheumatologists at 180 and 365 days in patients with osteoporosis and FRAX ® high-risk, and at all-time points in patients with osteopenia and FRAX® high-risk. The greater number of AOP starts in rheumatologists indicate closer adherence to NOF guidelines for treatment.
Conclusion: Rheumatologists started AOP therapy significantly more often in patients who would be recommended for therapy based on NOF guidelines. However, only 67.2% of rheumatology and 54.9% of non-rheumatology FRAX® high-risk with osteoporosis patients were started on AOP by 1-yr. In FRAX® high-risk with osteopenia patients only 40.5% of those treated by a rheumatologist and 27.8% of those not treated by a rheumatologist were started on therapy at 1-yr. These data indicate a care gap in osteoporosis treatment in both physician groups which needs to be addressed to improve quality of care.
Table 1. Percentage of osteoporosis treatment naïve patients started on osteoporosis therapy by Rheumatologists v Non-Rheumatologists based on time periods post-DXA |
|||||||||
Treatment Initiation |
Osteoporosis and FRAX® High-Risk (Rheum) |
Osteoporosis and FRAX® High-Risk (Non-Rheum) |
% diff |
Osteoporosis and FRAX Low-Risk® (Rheum) |
Osteoporosis and FRAX® Low-Risk (Non-Rheum) |
% diff |
Osteopenia and FRAX® High-Risk (Rheum) |
Osteopenia and FRAX® High-Risk (Non-Rheum) |
% diff |
% within 90 Days (n/group n) |
42.4 (70/165) |
40.3 (546/1355) |
2.1 |
32.4 (24/74) |
42.4 (378/891) |
-10.0 |
24.1 (58/241) |
17.3 (269/1554) |
6.8* |
% within 180 Days (n/group n) |
55.6 (85/153) |
48.6 (613/1262) |
7.0 |
45.7 (32/70) |
51.2 (429/838) |
-5.5 |
32.2 (75/233) |
21.9 (316/1440) |
10.3** |
% within 365 Days (n/group n) |
67.2 (90/134) |
54.9 (594/1082) |
12.3** |
58.3 (35/60) |
58.7 (423/721) |
-0.4 |
40.5 (81/200) |
27.8 (340/1225) |
12.7** |
Subjects who contributed at least the period days to the analysis were included in percentages for each row |
|||||||||
Rheum = subjects who had at least one visit with a rheumatologist in the year before and after DXA |
|||||||||
Non-Rheum = subjects not seen by a Rheumatologist in the year before and after DXA |
|||||||||
FRAX® High-Risk = 10-yr risk of hip fracture ≥3% and/or 1-yr risk of major osteoporotic fracture ≥20% |
|||||||||
FRAX® Low-Risk = 10-yr risk of hip fracture <3% and 10-yr risk of major osteoporotic fracture <20% |
|||||||||
% diff = the difference in percent treated by rheumatologists vs. a non-rheumatology physician |
|||||||||
*: p≤0.05 **: p≤0.01
|
Disclosure:
R. A. Overman,
None;
C. L. Deal,
None.
« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-osteoporosis-medication-starts-in-patients-based-on-t-score-and-frax-absolute-fracture-risk-model-in-a-large-health-care-system/