ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 879

Evaluation of Marijuana and Cannabidiol Use in the Rheumatologic Population from a Patient and Clinician Perspective: A Survey-Based Study

Heather Goodwin 1, Ali Porter1, Melinda Edwards 1 and Bonita Libman 1, 1The University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: cannabinoid, marijuana, survey and Rheumatology

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: 3S092: New Approaches to Old Diseases (875–879)

Session Type: ARP Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: To evaluate use of marijuana (MJ) and cannabidiol (CBD) as described by rheumatology patients at an academic medical center in Vermont, and to describe beliefs and practices of rheumatology clinicians regarding patient use of MJ and CBD in the United States.

Methods: A paper survey was distributed to adult patients during routine rheumatology clinic visits at the University of Vermont Medical Center between November 2018 and February 2019. A second survey was developed using Research Electronic Data Capture (RedCap) software and was disseminated via email to clinicians identified from the American College of Rheumatology membership list. Descriptive statistics were used to assess responses.

Results: A total of 419 patient surveys were collected with 148 (35.3%) reporting current use of MJ and/or CBD. Of those 148 patients, 42% were using both MJ and CBD, 36% only CBD, and 22% only MJ. RAPID3 scores of users were collected; 52% as high severity, 40% moderate, 36% low, and 21% near remission. Worsening disease severity influenced patient use (Wald χ2 (3) =15.3, p =0.0165). Over half (51%) agreed they were able to decrease use of pain medication when MJ or CBD was used. The average self-reported pain on a 0-10 scale before and after use of MJ and/or CBD was 6.9 and 4.4 respectively.

Nearly half of clinician respondents disagreed that MJ (45.2%; n = 106) or CBD (37.4%; n = 105) should be recommended as medical therapy for patients with rheumatologic disorders. Of those practicing in states where MJ is legal for medical and recreational use, 52.9% agreed that they were comfortable addressing questions surrounding use vs. 33.3% in states where MJ is illegal, although this was not statistically significant. Many disagreed that opioid and NSAID use decreases with marijuana use (33.9% and 40.9% respectively), this was similar for CBD (32.2% and 34.8% respectively). 

Conclusion: Patient and clinician perceptions are dissimilar regarding benefits of MJ and CBD use, especially around pain medication requirements. Worsening disease severity influences probability of use. Surrounding laws likely impact clinician perception and comfort with medical use. Additional research is needed to better understand the benefits and risks of MJ and CBD use in the rheumatologic patient population.


Disclosure: H. Goodwin, None; A. Porter, None; M. Edwards, Amgen, 8; B. Libman, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Goodwin H, Porter A, Edwards M, Libman B. Evaluation of Marijuana and Cannabidiol Use in the Rheumatologic Population from a Patient and Clinician Perspective: A Survey-Based Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-marijuana-and-cannabidiol-use-in-the-rheumatologic-population-from-a-patient-and-clinician-perspective-a-survey-based-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-marijuana-and-cannabidiol-use-in-the-rheumatologic-population-from-a-patient-and-clinician-perspective-a-survey-based-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology