ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1524

Evaluation of Changes in Cardiovascular Risk Factors Among Patients with RA Prescribed Biologic Dmards

E Alemao1, T Simon2, KK Gandhi1, H Kawabata2 and Jeffrey R. Curtis3, 1Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 2Bristol-Myers Squibb, Hopewell, NJ, 3University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Abatacept, cardiovascular disease and risk

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Studies have
reported that TNF-inhibitors (TNF-Is) are associated with a
reduced risk of cardiovascular (CV)
events,1 but data on their effects on traditional CV risk factors in
clinical practice are limited.
The objective of this analysis was to evaluate mean changes from baseline (CFB)
in CV risk factors of blood
pressure (BP), lipids, hemoglobin A1c (A1c) and CRP among
adult RA patients (pts) prescribed first bDMARDs. A secondary objective was to
compare mean CFB in CV risk factors in pts prescribed abatacept (ABA) vs TNF-Is
and other non-TNF-Is (excluding ABA).   Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using GE
Centricity® data, a nationally representative electronic database of >17 million de-identified medical records.
Inclusion criteria were: ≥1 RA diagnosis code (January 2000–February
2014), aged ≥18 yrs at diagnosis, received a
prescription for a bDMARD (index bDMARD), no bDMARD prescription during
baseline (12 months prior to index bDMARD), ≥1 CV risk factor measured during the baseline period and 1 during
follow-up, and receiving index bDMARD during 12-month follow-up. Lab values closest to the 12-month interval in a +/- 6-month window were
used to calculate CFB. CFB in CV risk factors were described using mean,
variance and SEs. Regression analyses were conducted for CFB in CV risk factors
as dependent variables, and baseline covariates of demographics, co-morbidities,
treatments to manage CV risk factors and RA treatments as independent variables.
Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess changes in CV risk factors among
pts who had treatment changes for BP, lipids and diabetes.   Results:   17,960 RA pts were
included in the analysis. Mean (SD) age: 53.8 (13.5) yrs; 75.6% female; 6.5%
had a CV event during baseline. Mean (SE; p-value) CFB were: systolic BP –0.50 mm
Hg (0.165; 0.002); diastolic BP –0.28 mm Hg (0.103; 0.006); low-density
lipoprotein (LDL) –2.42 mg/dL (0.81; 0.003); high-density lipoprotein (HDL)
0.23 mg/dL (0.27; 0.402); total cholesterol (TC) –1.87 mg/dL (0.83; 0.024);
triglycerides –0.23 mg/dL (1.36; 0.864); A1c 0.01% (0.04; 0.767); CRP –0.61 mg/dl
(0.099; <0.0001). Most (69%) pts did not have treatment for CV risk factors
at baseline or follow-up; within this untreated subgroup, the CFB in CV risk
factors were only statistically significant for HDL and CRP. Beta coefficients
of the regression analysis for CFB in CV risk factors between pts prescribed
ABA vs TNF-Is and ABA vs non-TNF-Is are shown in the Table; none were significant
at an alpha level of 0.05.

Conclusion:

Though we observed that CV risk
factors of BP, lipids (LDL-cholesterol and TC) and CRP levels were
significantly reduced in RA pts prescribed bDMARDs, these reductions (except
CRP) are likely driven by treatment for CV risk factors. There were no
differences in changes in CV risk factor levels between pts prescribed abatacept
and those prescribed TNF-Is or other non-TNF-Is.

1.   
Solomon
DH, et al. Am J Med 2013;126:730.e9-730.e17.

 

Table. Comparison of CV risk factor changes between ABA vs TNF-Is and ABA vs non-TNF-Is (excluding ABA)

*Non-TNF-Is (excluding ABA) vs ABA

p-value comparing non-TNF-Is vs ABA

*TNF-Is vs ABA

 

p-value comparing TNF-Is vs ABA

Change in diastolic BP (mm Hg)

(n=858)

0.2313

0.7663

(n=11,217)

0.0068

0.9890

Change in systolic BP (mm Hg)

(n=859)

–0.8450

0.4968

(n=11,224)

–0.7392

0.3507

LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)

(n=135)

–4.9075

0.3579

(n=1382)

–1.9861

0.5859

HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)

(n=162)

0.5214

0.7770

(n=1706)

–1.1205

0.3495

Total cholesterol (mg/dL)

(n=151)

–0.8647

0.8806

(n=1696)

–2.2164

0.5535

Triglyceride (mg/dL)

(n=161)

–6.2453

0.4969

(n=1714)

1.6441

0.7855

A1c (%)

(n=83)

–0.3282

0.1997

(n=771)

–0.1519

0.3590

CRP

(n=246)

–0.2444

0.7572

(n=3585)

–0.3862

0.4403

*Regression coefficients, ABA is the reference group. A1c=hemoglobin A1c; ABA=abatacept; BP=blood pressure; CV=cardiovascular; HDL=high-density lipoprotein; LDL=low-density lipoprotein.

   

Disclosure: E. Alemao, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1; T. Simon, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; K. Gandhi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; H. Kawabata, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; J. R. Curtis, Roche/Genentech, UCB, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie, 2,Roche/Genentech, UCB, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Alemao E, Simon T, Gandhi K, Kawabata H, Curtis JR. Evaluation of Changes in Cardiovascular Risk Factors Among Patients with RA Prescribed Biologic Dmards [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-changes-in-cardiovascular-risk-factors-among-patients-with-ra-prescribed-biologic-dmards/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-changes-in-cardiovascular-risk-factors-among-patients-with-ra-prescribed-biologic-dmards/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology