ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 193

Evaluation of a Diversionary Back Pain Service

Lynden Roberts, Rheumatology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Australia

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Back pain, back surgery and healthcare reform

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Health Services Research Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Surgical treatment of spinal pain is rarely indicated. Nevertheless, primary care clinician referrals to spinal surgeons for evaluation of spinal pain conditions are common. In the publicly funded hospital system in Australia, more than 90% of those referred to spinal surgeons with back pain do not receive surgery. It may be more appropriate for many people with spinal pain to be diagnosed and managed under a different model of health care.

Methods: A weekly spinal pain clinic was established at a publicly funded hospital. The clinic was staffed by a rheumatologist and 4 physiotherapists. All spinal pain referrals to the hospital’s spinal surgeons were diverted to the new clinic, with the exception of referrals assessed as likely spinal cord compression or cauda equina syndrome. Patients with previously diagnosed chronic spinal pain were not seen in the new clinic. Clinical and administrative data was prospectively and routinely collected including clinical diagnosis, Short Form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire, and clinical outcomes including whether spinal surgery was done. An 11-point Likert scale (0-10) was used to collect the patient satisfaction with the clinic following the encounter.

Results: A total of 575 face-to-face patient encounters occurred in the first 12 months of the service including 363 new patients. Low back pain with radiculopathy was the commonest diagnosis. Average Örebro score was 67%. The failure-to-attend rate was 7%. Nearly half of the patients were discharged to community physiotherapy management, 2% to a chronic pain service, and 9%to a spinal surgeon. For patients referred to a spinal surgeon, 80% underwent spinal surgery. Average patient satisfaction was 9.2.

Conclusion: A novel model of care involving the substitution of spinal surgeons with a rheumatologist and physiotherapists for the assessment of patients with spinal pain was established. The patients assessed had a high estimated risk for future work disability. Efficient clinical care and a high patient satisfaction was demonstrated.


Disclosure: L. Roberts, None;

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Roberts L. Evaluation of a Diversionary Back Pain Service [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-a-diversionary-back-pain-service/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-a-diversionary-back-pain-service/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology