ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2352

Evaluation and Management Of Laboratory Abnormalities During Tocilizumab Treatment Either As Monotherapy Or In Combination With Dmards In RA Patients:  Findings From The ACT-STAR Study

Michael Weinblatt1, Dennis Preston2, Josh Friedman2, Natasha Singh2, Jenny Devenport3 and Joel M. Kremer4, 1Division of Rheumatology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, 3Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, 4Albany Medical College and The Center for Rheumatology, Albany, NY

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: safety and tocilizumab

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy III

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Laboratory values from phase III clinical trials of tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with RA were the basis of the recommendations for monitoring and managing the potential risks associated with laboratory abnormalities.  In order to further evaluate and understand the extent and impact of lab abnormalities and their outcomes, additional analyses of the open-label phase IIIB ACT-STAR study, were undertaken.

Methods: ACT-STAR was a prospective, open-label phase IIIB study that evaluated safety, tolerability and efficacy of TCZ monotherapy (Mono) and TCZ + DMARDs in adults with moderate to severe, active RA who were inadequate responders or had safety/tolerability related issues with stable doses of their current DMARDs or biologic based regimens.  All patients exposed to TCZ in ACT-STAR were included in this analysis.  Scheduled labs were collected and analyzed centrally every 4 weeks during the core study (24 wks + 8wks follow-up) and every 8 wks during the long term extension (eligible patients completing the core study could receive TCZ until ≥3 months after commercial availability).  AEs were collected on an ongoing basis.  Laboratory abnormalities of interest (LFTs, neutrophils, platelets) were assessed and subsequent AEs, study medication changes and outcomes were evaluated for possible associations.

Results: 883 patients received TCZ treatment in ACT-STAR (TCZ 8 mg/kg Mono, n=138; TCZ 4 mg/kg + DMARD with option to escalate to 8 mg/kg at or after week 8, n=364; TCZ 8 mg/kg + DMARD, n=381). Of the 142 (16.2%) patients with ALT > ULN (55 U/L) or 77 (8.8%) with AST > ULN (40 U/L) for ≥ 2 consecutive scheduled visits, > 50% normalized during the study and most completed the planned treatment and observation period.  No cases of drug induced liver injury were reported for either group.  Of the 26 (3%) patients with ANC ≤ 1000 cells/mm3 at any point, 81% normalized during study and none experienced serious infections.  Similarly, of the 24 (2.7%) patients with platelets ≤ 100,000 cells/mm3 at any point, 75% normalized during study and no serious bleeding events were observed.    

Conclusion: Management of patients with RA who receive tocilizumab requires periodic examinations and laboratory monitoring to assess potential risks.  In ACT-STAR, no association between lab abnormalities and clinical consequences was observed. Results from this study support the current monitoring guidelines in place in the USPI for TCZ.

Resolution

Associations*

Parameter

Rate

n/N (%)

Normalized

n/N (%)

Did not normalize

n/N (%)

ALT†

Sustained‡ ALT > ULN (55 U/L)

142/876 (16.2)

73/142 (51)

·  43/73 normalized with medication changes  after 2nd consecutive elevation

·  30/73 normalized without medication changes after 2nd consecutive elevation

69/142 (48.6)

·   18/69 had no follow-up labs after 2nd consecutive abnormal lab finding (eg., at last visit)

·   51/69 had labs after 2nd consecutive elevation [20 had  no medication changes; 31 had medication changes]

No reports of drug-induced liver injury observed at any time point

AST†

Sustained‡

AST > ULN (40 U/L)

77/876 (8.8)

46/77 (60)

·  28/46 normalized with medication changes  after 2nd consecutive elevation

·   18/46 normalized without medication changes after 2nd consecutive elevation

31/77 (40)

·   11/31 had no follow-up labs after 2nd consecutive abnormal lab finding (eg., at last visit)

·   20/31 had labs after 2nd consecutive elevation [10 had medication changes; 10 had no medication changes]

No reports of drug-induced liver injury observed at any time point

Neutrophils

ANC ≤ 1000 cells/mm3 on at least 1 occasion

26/876 (3.0)

21/26 (81)

5/26 (19)

·   5/5 had no follow-up labs after abnormal lab finding (eg., at last visit)

No serious infections observed at any time point

Platelets

≤ 100,000 cells/mm3 on at least 1 occasion

Platelets  < 50,000-25,000 cells/mm3on at least 1 occasion

24/876 (2.7)

2/876 (< 1)

18/24 (75)

6/24 (25)

·   6/6 had no follow-up labs after abnormal lab finding (eg., at last visit)

No serious bleeding events observed at any time point

* Associations apply to all patients with the abnormality regardless of normalization status.

†LFT parameters were analyzed separately for events or resolution.  However, 154 patients had either ALT or AST sustained elevations (12 AST only, 77 ALT only, 65 both).

‡ Sustained is defined as an abnormal value at ≥ 2 consecutive visits.


Disclosure:

M. Weinblatt,

Amgen, Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, UCB, Abbott, Merck, Pfizer and Roche/Genentech,

5;

D. Preston,

Roche/Genetech,

3;

J. Friedman,

Genentech, Inc.,

3;

N. Singh,

Genentech, Inc.,

4;

J. Devenport,

Genentech, Inc.,

3;

J. M. Kremer,

Genentech, Pfizer, Lilly, UCB, Novartis,

2,

Genentech, Pfizer, Lilly, UCB, Novartis,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-and-management-of-laboratory-abnormalities-during-tocilizumab-treatment-either-as-monotherapy-or-in-combination-with-dmards-in-ra-patients-findings-from-the-act-star-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology