ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1153

EULAR ‘Points to Consider’ for the Conduction of Workforce Requirement Studies in Rheumatology

Christian Dejaco1,2, Polina Putrik3, Julia Unger4, Daniel Aletaha5, Gerolamo Bianchi6, Johannes W. J. Bijlsma7, Annelies Boonen8, Nada Cikes9, Axel Finckh10, Laure Gossec11, Tore Kvien12, Joao Madruga Dias13, Eric L. Matteson14, Francisca Sivera15, Tanja Stamm16, Zoltan Szekanecz17, Dieter Wiek18, Angela Zink19, Sofia Ramiro20 and Frank Buttgereit21, 1Rheumatology, Hospital of Bruneck, Bruneck, Italy, 2Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria, 3Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands, 4FH JOANNEUM, University of Applied Sciences, Bad Gleichenberg, Austria, 5Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Vienna, Austria, 6Rheumatology, ASL3-Azienda Sanitaria Genovese, Genua, Italy, 7Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 8Caphri Research Institute, Maastricht, Netherlands, 9University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia, 10University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland, 11Rheumatology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France, 12Dept. of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 13Centro Hospitalar Médio Tejo, Torres Novas, Portugal, 14Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, 15Rheumatology, Hospital General Universitario de Elda. Comunidad Valenciana. Spain, Elda, Spain, 16Section for Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 17Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary, Debrecen, Hungary, 18EULAR Standing Committee of PARE, Zurich, Switzerland, 19Epidemiology Unit / Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, German Rheumatism Research Centre (DRFZ) / Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany, 20Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen & Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 21Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: epidemiologic methods and rheumatic disease, Public Health Approach, Workforce

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health Poster II: Gout, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Osteoarthritis, Osteoporosis, Pain, and Function

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Recommendations and strategies have been developed for early referral, diagnosis and treatment of rheumatic diseases. These strategies, however, can only be implemented if sufficient manpower is available. An estimation of how many rheumatologists are needed to meet current and future population needs must be provided in order to counsel health care planners and decision makers. Current methods used for forecasting manpower are disparate, as are the variables incorporated into workforce projection models. Consequently, projections for the need of rheumatologists may vary by a factor of five between studies. The objective of these EULAR points to consider (PTC) was to guide future workforce studies in adult rheumatology in order to produce valid and reliable manpower estimates.

Methods: The EULAR Standardised Operating Procedures were followed. A multidisciplinary task force with experts including patients with rheumatic diseases from 11 EULAR countries and the USA was assembled. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to retrieve workforce models in rheumatology and other medical fields. PTC were based on expert opinion informed by the SLR, followed by group discussions with consensus obtained through informal voting. The level of agreement with the PTC was voted anonymously. 

Results: A total of 10 PTC were formulated (Table). The task force recommends models integrating supply (= workforce available to rheumatology), demand (= health services requested by the population) and need (= health services that are considered appropriate to serve the population). Projections of workforce requirement should consider all factors relevant for current and future workload in and outside direct patient care. Forecasts of workforce supply should consider demography and attrition of rheumatologists, as well as the effects of new developments in health care.

Conclusion: These EULAR endorsed PTC will provide guidance on the methodology and the parameters to be applied in future national and international workforce requirement studies in rheumatology.

 

Table 1. EULAR points to consider for the conduction of workforce requirement studies in rheumatology

No

Point to consider

LoA

LoE

1

Workforce models should integrate supply, demand and need of the respective geopolitical entity (e.g. municipality, region, state, country), and should express results as full time equivalents and as number of rheumatologists.

9.5 (0.9)

95%≥8

5

2

Workforce models should provide projections over a period of 5-15 years.

9.1 (1.1)

90%≥8

5

3

Workforce models should not assume a current balance between supply and need.

 

9.6 (0.7)

100%≥8

5

4

Workforce models should, where possible, rely on several data sources and include uncertainty analyses.

9.8 (0.4)

100%≥8

5

5

Workforce models should be regularly updated; updates should include an analysis of the actual performance (i.e. prediction validity) of the previous model.

9.5 (0.6)

100%≥8

5

6

Workforce need for patient care should be based on the prevalence and referral rates of diseases managed by rheumatologists as well as on an estimation of time needed per patient.

9.7 (0.7)

100%≥8

5

7

Workforce need for patient care should consider current and future demographics, sociocultural characteristics of the population and disease patterns.

9.5 (0.9)

95%≥8

5

8

Workforce need and supply should consider work outside rheumatology patient care (e.g. administrative tasks, research, teaching, non-rheumatologic disease management), as well as patient care performed by other health professionals in rheumatology.

9.4 (0.9)

95%≥8

5

9

Workforce supply should account for demographic composition of rheumatologists, the number of rheumatologists entering and leaving the workforce, and generational attitudes of rheumatologists towards scope of practice and work-life balance.

9.1 (2.3)

85%≥8

5

10

Workforce models should consider the effects of medical developments, including new technologies, medications, artificial intelligence and e-health, on demand and supply.

9.4 (1.1)

85%≥8

5

Numbers in column ‘LoA’ indicate the mean and SD (in parentheses) of the LoA, as well as the percentage of task force members with an agreement ≥8. None of the studies identified corresponded to any of the categories of Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM). Evidence level was therefore set as “5”, which is the lowest level of evidence.  LoA, Level of Agreement; LoE, Level of Evidence according to OCEBM 2011 levels of evidence.


Disclosure: C. Dejaco, None; P. Putrik, None; J. Unger, None; D. Aletaha, None; G. Bianchi, None; J. W. J. Bijlsma, None; A. Boonen, None; N. Cikes, None; A. Finckh, None; L. Gossec, None; T. Kvien, None; J. Madruga Dias, None; E. L. Matteson, None; F. Sivera, None; T. Stamm, None; Z. Szekanecz, None; D. Wiek, None; A. Zink, None; S. Ramiro, None; F. Buttgereit, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dejaco C, Putrik P, Unger J, Aletaha D, Bianchi G, Bijlsma JWJ, Boonen A, Cikes N, Finckh A, Gossec L, Kvien T, Madruga Dias J, Matteson EL, Sivera F, Stamm T, Szekanecz Z, Wiek D, Zink A, Ramiro S, Buttgereit F. EULAR ‘Points to Consider’ for the Conduction of Workforce Requirement Studies in Rheumatology [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/eular-points-to-consider-for-the-conduction-of-workforce-requirement-studies-in-rheumatology/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/eular-points-to-consider-for-the-conduction-of-workforce-requirement-studies-in-rheumatology/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology