ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2252

Estimated Cost of SLE Hospitalizations

Kayla Neville1, James Miceli1, Jianhua Li2, Samantha Nguyen3, Teja Kapoor3 and Anca Askanase3, 1Rheumatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 2Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 3Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Economics, Electronic Health Record, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and utilization review

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Health Services Research - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treatment comes at a high price, with both direct costs related to healthcare resource utilization and indirect ones related to decreased work productivity. Previous studies have attempted to estimate the annual medical costs of SLE patients in the United States using available Medicare datasets. This study was initiated to estimate health care costs to payers for SLE treatment at a major U.S. academic institution.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating healthcare utilization for patients with SLE treated at Columbia University Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital between January 2000 and September 2014, using electronic medical record (EMR) data from the Clinical Data Warehouse. The control groups are represented by patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and patients with renal transplants. Patients with SLE, RA, or renal transplant were identified using diagnostic codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9). Data on diagnosis-related group (DRG) weighting was obtained from www.cms.gov; base rates for emergency and hospital visits were obtained from www.health.ny.gov.

Results:  4,800 hospitalized patients with SLE were identified based on one ICD-9 code for lupus. The diagnosis of SLE using these criteria was validated based on review of 134 charts; this method of identifying SLE cases in the Data Warehouse had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.66 for diagnosing SLE. A total of 5,642 patients with renal transplant, and 7,273 with RA were also identified. Reimbursement from payers for hospital admissions and ER visits were estimated from the DRG weights and base rates. The DRG provides a weighting system based on the severity of the average patient. For SLE and RA alone, the respective weight is 0.7882 and 0.7337; with a comorbid condition, it is 1.1645 and 1.2287. For SLE with a major comorbid condition, it is 2.4409, while the renal transplant weight is 3.154 regardless of comorbidities or severity.

SLE

Renal Transplant

RA

Unique Patients (N)

4,800

5,642

7,273

ED Visit (N)

20,178

18,426

31,718

Average ED Visits/patient

4.20

3.27

4.36

Reimbursement for ED visit ($)

155.57

622.54

144.82

Total Reimbursement for ED Visits ($ x 106)

3.14

11.47

4.59

Hospital Admissions (N)

10,464

23,518

16,255

Hospital Admissions/patient

2.18

4.17

2.23

Reimbursement per Hospital Admission ($)

23,830

30,800

10,960

Total Reimbursement Hospital Admissions ($ x 106)

249.39

724.25

178.21

Conclusion:  These data suggest that the cost to payers, health insurance companies, for hospital-based care for SLE (252.53 mil $) is higher than that for RA (182.8 mil $) despite the much higher prevalence of RA. However, the true cost of a lupus patient to the admitting hospital—especially a hospital that provides tertiary and quaternary care—can be much higher than what is reimbursed; it is likely closer to the cost of a transplant patient, as patients with moderate/severe SLE are treated with the same immunosuppressants as transplant recipients and are at risk for the same co-morbidities. In sum, these data suggest that SLE care in hospitals is expensive for health insurers. Further efforts should be made to improve outpatient management in order to reduce excessive use of emergency room resources, as has been done with the renal transplant population. Additionally, hospitals and providers should lobby for a revision of the DRG weights for SLE.


Disclosure: K. Neville, None; J. Miceli, None; J. Li, None; S. Nguyen, None; T. Kapoor, None; A. Askanase, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Neville K, Miceli J, Li J, Nguyen S, Kapoor T, Askanase A. Estimated Cost of SLE Hospitalizations [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/estimated-cost-of-sle-hospitalizations/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/estimated-cost-of-sle-hospitalizations/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology