ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2252

Epratuzumab-Treated Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients Report Improvements in Health-Related Quality of Life: Final Results from an Open-Label Extension Study (SL0006)

V. Strand1, K. Hobbs2, D.J. Wallace3, K. Kalunian4, B. Kilgallen5, E. Nikaï6, W.A. Wegener7 and D.M. Goldenberg8, 1Adjunct, Division of Immunology / Rheumatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 2Denver Arthritis Clinic, Denver, CO, 3Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 4UCSD School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, 5UCB Pharma, Smyrna, GA, 6UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium, 7Immunomedics Inc, Morris Plains, NJ, 8Centre for Molecular Medicine and Immunology, Morris Plains, NJ

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Clinical Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Epratuzumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD22, is in development for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs): ALLEVIATE 1 and 2 were prematurely terminated because of interruption of drug supply. SL0006 was an open-label extension study in which patients previously enrolled in the ALLEVIATE trials received epratuzumab.1 Assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) alongside measures of disease activity and damage is recommended in SLE RCTs and provides a comprehensive view of therapeutic responses.2,3 This presentation reports final data from SL0006 on the effect of epratuzumab on HRQoL measured using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).

Methods:

All patients enrolled in ALLEVIATE US sites who received randomized treatment (n = 60) and satisfied all inclusion criteria were eligible for enrollment in SL0006. Twenty-nine patients (90% female, 79% Caucasian, mean age 40 years) entered SL0006, having received placebo (n = 8), 360 (n = 17) or 720 (n = 4) mg/m2 epratuzumab during the ALLEVIATE double-blind trials. In SL0006, all patients received 12-week cycles of 360 mg/m2 epratuzumab; two infusions on days 1 and 8 of each cycle. SF-36 was assessed at screening and every 4 weeks thereafter. Mean changes were compared to ALLEVIATE baseline and SL0006 screening values.

Results:

The table shows means and mean changes in PCS and MCS and individual SF-36 domain scores vs age- and gender-matched norms.4 At ALLEVIATE baseline, PCS and MCS scores were approximately 2 and 1 standard deviations below normative values, respectively; domain scores 7.9–48.5 points lower than age- and gender-matched norms, reflecting the broad impact of active SLE on HRQoL. At the SL0006 screening visit, mean changes from ALLEVIATE baseline (BL) in SF-36 PCS and 5 domain scores met or exceeded minimal clinically important differences (MCID). Throughout SL0006, these improvements were maintained or improved up to and including week 192, after which patients numbers were <50% of the screening population. Changes from ALLEVIATE baseline scores were ≥ MCID in PCS and all its domains at all timepoints, apart from RE and MH, where numerical improvements were evident and ≥ MCID at some visits. Further improvement during SL0006 was evidenced by clinically meaningful changes from the screening visit at most timepoints in PCS, RP, BP, GH, VT and SF, and at the last available visit for PCS RP, BP and SF.

 

Conclusion:

In an open-label, single-arm extension to 2 double-blind studies, patients receiving epratuzumab reported clinically meaningful improvements in HRQoL that were sustained over approximately 4 years of treatment.

References

1.            Strand. Arthritis Rheum 2008;57(Suppl):1086.

2.            Jolly. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2010;12:229-36.

3.            Strand et al. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2011;11:455-68.

4.            Strand et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:482.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Disclosure:

V. Strand,

UCB Pharma,

5;

K. Hobbs,

HGS, UCB Pharma,

5;

D. J. Wallace,

BMS, Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc, Humen Genome Sciences Inc, MedImmune, Novo Nordisk and UCB Pharma,

5;

K. Kalunian,

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc, Anthera, MedImmune, Novo Nordisk, Zymogenetics, Serono and UCB Pharma,

5,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc, Cephalon, Cypress, MedImmune, Novo Nordisk and UCB Pharma,

2;

B. Kilgallen,

UCB Pharma,

3;

E. Nikaï,

UCB Pharma,

3;

W. A. Wegener,

Immunomedics, Inc.,

1,

Immunomedics, Inc.,

3;

D. M. Goldenberg,

Immunomedics, Inc.,

3,

Immunomedics, Inc.,

1,

Immunomedics, Inc.,

6.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/epratuzumab-treated-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-patients-report-improvements-in-health-related-quality-of-life-final-results-from-an-open-label-extension-study-sl0006/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology