ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 427

Epigenetic Features As Predictive Markers of Responsiveness to Epitope-Specific Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Roberto Spreafico1, Maura Rossetti1, Theodorus Van Der Broek1, Olivia Morrow1 and Salvatore Albani2, 1Translational Immunology, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, 2Translational Research Program, Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, CA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: biomarkers and rheumatoid arthritis, pathogenesis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Human Etiology and Pathogenisis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

The focus of current research for new therapeutic approaches in Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is shifting from mere suppression to induction and maintenance of tolerance. Adaptive immunity, specifically the balance and functions of effector and regulatory CD4+ T cells, is central in this context. We have recently developed a protocol of oral tolerance induction to an epitope (dnaJP1) derived from a heat shock protein (HSP), a key component of the mechanism of perpetuation and amplification of chronic autoimmune inflammation. Phase II trial results showed clinical efficacy and an intriguing immune deviation of T cell immunity. In order to dissect further the mechanism of action and also to identify biomarkers predictive of susceptibility to treatment, we employed here whole genome DNA methylation analysis, which can be correlated to gene expression and is relatively more stable compared to mRNA, the basis of the well-known whole transcriptome analysis.

Methods:

Total CD4+ T cells from 12 patients taken at baseline, equally segregated in placebo responders/non-responders (R/NR) and HSP peptide R/NR, were sorted from PBMCs. DNA was extracted and bisulfite converted to analyze the cytosine methylation pattern. Converted DNA was analyzed using Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip, yielding the methylation percentage of more than 485,000 CpG sites across the genome.

Results:

A nearly perfect segregation of R and NR was observed when Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied to the whole dataset. When sites selected for discriminating R from NR (based on p-value and fold change) were used, PCA was also able to discriminate, based on average DAS-28 scores, weak responders from strong responders. Weak responders were more frequent among placebo treated subjects, while HSP peptide-treated subjects comprised stronger responders. In order to enrich for sites discriminating R and NR with high confidence without losing power due to the high number of CpG sites, pre-filtering of sites with low variance was performed. With this method, we found 51 sites differentially methylated between R and NR, clearly  supporting the potential of the whole genome methylation analysis for discovery of new candidate biomarkers. As a control, mock comparisons, such as between all placebo against all HSP peptide-treated subjects irrespective of clinical outcome (which is not meaningful at baseline due to patient randomization) were run and consistently yielded fewer hits. 

Conclusion:

We found significant differences in the general pattern of DNA methylation between RA patients responding or not responding to an epitope-specific therapy. We have also identified a set of CpG sites with high predictive and prognostic power for discriminating the responsiveness to treatment, which may be developed as a screening tool. The functions of the genes found to be differentially methylated is currently under investigation.


Disclosure:

R. Spreafico,
None;

M. Rossetti,
None;

T. Van Der Broek,
None;

O. Morrow,
None;

S. Albani,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/epigenetic-features-as-predictive-markers-of-responsiveness-to-epitope-specific-therapy-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology