ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2478

Enthesitis Frequency and Treatment Patterns in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis in Europe and Japan

Daniel Aletaha1, Patrick Zueger 2, Naijun Chen 2 and Nicola Booth 3, 1Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 2AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 3Adelphi Real World, Bollington, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster III: Psoriatic Arthritis, Clinical Features

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Enthesitis, a symptom commonly associated with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), negatively affects quality of life. Although enthesitis is routinely reported in randomized clinical trials of new therapies for PsA, it has not been well characterized in real-world patient populations. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency and severity of enthesitis and describe treatment patterns in PsA patients with enthesitis in Europe and Japan.

Methods: Data were analysed from the Adelphi PsA Disease Specific Programme, a cross-sectional survey of 344 rheumatologists (and orthopedic surgeons and internists in Japan), 171 dermatologists and their consulting patients in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK (5EU) and Japan from 03/2018 to 11/2018. Participating physicians completed patient record forms capturing clinical and treatment information based on medical record data. Patients with a physician-confirmed diagnosis of PsA who were ≥18 years old and not participating in a clinical trial were eligible for inclusion. The proportion of patients with enthesitis was assessed overall and by country at several times during the PsA disease course. For patients currently experiencing enthesitis, data describing enthesitis severity and PsA-related treatments were collected.

Results: 1945 patients with PsA were included. Mean age was 48.9 (SD 13.6) years, 54.2% were male, and mean time since diagnosis was 59.3 (SD 5.9) months (n=1595). Overall, 26.8% of patients ever had enthesitis, 12.0% of patients currently had enthesitis, 22.0% had enthesitis at the time of PsA diagnosis, and 23.8% had enthesitis at their most recent PsA-related treatment initiation (Table 1). At each time point assessed, the proportion of patients with enthesitis was greatest in Japan and lowest in Germany. Of patients with current enthesitis, 28.8% of cases were moderate or severe compared with 70.0% of cases at diagnosis and 61.8% of cases at initiation of patients’ most recent PsA-related treatment regimen. The most frequently used medications among patient with current enthesitis were biologic DMARDs (58.4%), conventional synthetic DMARDs (47.2%), and NSAIDs (32.2%) (Table 2).

Conclusion: Enthesitis is a common disease manifestation in real-world PsA patients in Europe and Japan. The majority of patients with current enthesitis were treated with advanced therapies; physicians rated patients’ enthesitis as moderate or severe in 28.8% of those who continued to have enthesitis despite treatment, suggesting an unmet need and target for future PsA therapies.

Medical writing services provided by Joann Hettasch (Fishawack Group, US) and funded by AbbVie.


Disclosure: D. Aletaha, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche, 5, AbbVie, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and Roche., 2, Amgen, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and UCB, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 5, 8, Medac, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, Merck Sharp and Dohme, 2, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Sandoz, 5, 8, Sanofi/Genzyme, 5, 8, UCB, 8; P. Zueger, AbbVie, 1, 3; N. Chen, AbbVie, 1, 3, 4; N. Booth, Adelphi Real World, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Aletaha D, Zueger P, Chen N, Booth N. Enthesitis Frequency and Treatment Patterns in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis in Europe and Japan [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/enthesitis-frequency-and-treatment-patterns-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-in-europe-and-japan/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/enthesitis-frequency-and-treatment-patterns-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-in-europe-and-japan/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology