ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1305

Enriching Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial Cohorts with Erosion Progressors By Screening for Active Erosions (Erosions with Osteitis) with MRI

Charles Peterfy1, Paul Bird2, Peter Countryman1, Fred Joshua3, Stephen Hall4, Hedley Griffiths5, Peter Youssef6 and Anna Holmes7, 1Spire Sciences, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, 2Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 3Combined Rheumatology Practice, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 4Cabrini Medical Centre, Malvern, VIC, Australia, 5Barwon Rheumatology Service, Geelong, VIC, Australia, 6Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia, 7Roche Products, Pty. Limited, Dee Why, NSW, Australia

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: MRI and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases - Poster II: XR/CT/PET/MRI

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Radiography is often used in RA clinical trials to screen for bone erosions (ERO) to ensure that only patients with the erosive phenotype are enrolled. Despite this fewer than 30% of patients in most RA cohorts show significant progression of joint damage. Osteitis (OST) and synovitis (SYN) on MRI have been shown to predict ERO progression, and may thus offer further opportunity to enrich clinical trial cohorts with patients more likely to progress structurally. However, previous studies examining these MRI parameters were at the patient level, and were thus confounded by the multiplicity of individual joint score combinations that could produce a similar total score. We have examined the association between OST and SYN at baseline and the progression of ERO on follow-up at the level of individual bones and joints in an unplanned sub-analysis of the AC-CUTE trial (NCT01951170).1

Methods:  50 patients with active RA who had inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) or other DMARDs and had at least one ERO on screening radiographs or MRI were included in the sub-analysis. 1.5T MRI of one hand (MCP 1-5) and wrist was acquired at baseline and 24 weeks. Two radiologists scored all images blinded to visit order using the RA MRI Score (RAMRIS); the two radiologists’ scores were averaged.

Results:  A total of 1245 bones were examined. ERO, OST and SYN at baseline were each associated with ERO progression, with odds ratios (OR) of 9.5, 3.7 and 3.1, respectively (Table). OST was more strongly associated with ERO progression than ERO or SYN were. Among bones with ERO at baseline, a larger proportion of those with concurrent OST, i.e., “active” ERO (OR = 1.6) but not those with adjacent SYN (OR = 1.0) progressed. At the patient level, the OR for progression with active ERO (ERO + OST) versus with ERO alone was 1.7. Screening for ERO originally excluded 6% of patients from participating in the study. Screening for at least one bone with active ERO would have excluded 28% more. Requiring patients also to have SYN adjacent to the bone with active ERO would have raised the screen failure rate to 42%.

Conclusion:  Baseline ERO, OST and SYN were each associated with ERO progression at the individual bone and joint level. Screening with MRI for the presence of active ERO may enrich RA trial cohorts with likely progressors more effectively than would screening for ERO, OST or SYN alone. References: 1. Bird et al. EULAR 2016, (AB0368). [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.3780]. Table: Effect of ERO, OST and SYN at baseline on subsequent ERO progression

MRI Feature

% Bones Involved

% ERO Progression*

– ERO

65.3

1.4

+ ERO

34.7

12.0

– OST

82.6

4.1

+ OST

18.3

14.0

– SYN

37.3

2.8

+ SYN

62.7

8.2

+ ERO – OST

20.0

10.0

+ ERO + OST

14.5

14.9

+ ERO – SYN

18.7

12.6

+ ERO + SYN

46.8

12.2

*Erosion progression defined as ≥0.5


Disclosure: C. Peterfy, Spire Sciences, Inc., 3; P. Bird, None; P. Countryman, Spire Sciences, Inc., 3; F. Joshua, None; S. Hall, None; H. Griffiths, None; P. Youssef, None; A. Holmes, Roche Products, Pty. Limited, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Peterfy C, Bird P, Countryman P, Joshua F, Hall S, Griffiths H, Youssef P, Holmes A. Enriching Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial Cohorts with Erosion Progressors By Screening for Active Erosions (Erosions with Osteitis) with MRI [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/enriching-rheumatoid-arthritis-trial-cohorts-with-erosion-progressors-by-screening-for-active-erosions-erosions-with-osteitis-with-mri/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/enriching-rheumatoid-arthritis-trial-cohorts-with-erosion-progressors-by-screening-for-active-erosions-erosions-with-osteitis-with-mri/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology