ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 333

Electronic Delivery of Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaires on Tablet PCs at Clinic Visit: A Feasibility Study

Thomas Grader-Beck1, Michelle Jones2, Ana-Maria Orbai2 and Clifton O. Bingham III3, 1Medicine (Rheumatology), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 2Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 3Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Electronic Health Record, patient-reported outcome measures and quality improvement

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Measures and Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at clinic visits has emerged as an important component to determine disease activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). However, paper-based distribution, scoring and documentation on PROs is time-consuming and prone to human error. Modern electronic health record (EHR) systems allow for automatic integration of PRO data captured on tablets in the waiting room. Distribution, scoring, analysis and documentation of PRO questionnaires can be automated, thereby increasing the time a provider can spend with each patient.  Methods: A paper-based RA questionnaire containing components of PROMIS profiles was transformed into an electronic version within the Epic EHR system (Figure 1). Questionnaires were assigned automatically at clinic visit using rule-based logic and completed on Windows tablets. Automated calculation of PROMIS T scores was programmed into Epic according to the PROMIS manual. Average time to complete the questionnaire and percentage of completed PROMIS domains were calculated. Smart links were built to allow the automatic integration of the results into the clinic note. A specific alert was programmed to notify providers in case of severe depression as determined by the PROMIS depression T score equivalent to the PHQ-9 definition using PROsetta stone.  Results: 297 questionnaires were delivered to consecutive outpatients seen at the Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center. The median time to complete 55 questions was 8 minutes 15 seconds (9 seconds per question). Median time increased with age and was highest in the group of 71-80 years of age, at 10 minutes 46 seconds. The completion rate for individual PROMIS domains ranged between 94.6% and 97.6%.A severe depression alert was triggered in 8/297 patients (2.7%). Aggregated PROMIS domain T scores were successfully extracted from the EHR system (table 1). Conclusion: Electronic delivery of PRO questionnaires on tablets in the clinic waiting room is feasible and well accepted by patients with arthritis. This workflow leads to a high completion rate of PRO questionnaires and decreases provider workload with regards to scoring and documentation time. Application of rule-based logic allows for a tailored assignment of PRO questionnaires to specific patient populations.

 

T score (lower is better)

≤50

50-≤55

55-≤60

60-≤65

65-≤70

>70

Fatigue (n=289)

28.7(%)

18.0(%)

15.6(%)

15.6(%)

13.5(%)

8.7(%)

Pain Interference (n=290)

20.7

10.3

25.5

20.0

16.9

6.6

Sleep  (n= 281)

34.9

28.1

22.1

7.1

4.3

3.6

Anxiety (n=284)

40.8

15.1

15.8

11.3

10.9

6.0

Depression  (n=286)

49.7

9.4

18.9

13.6

5.6

2.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T score (higher is better)

≥50

45-<50

40-<45

35-<40

30<35

<30

Physical Function  (n=285)

20.4(%)

16.1(%)

22.1(%)

17.2(%)

17.9(%)

6.3(%)

Ability To Participate (n= 289)

38.4

18.3

19.0

13.8

5.5

4.8

Table 1: Distribution of PROMIS domain T scores of patients evaluated at the Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center using tablet PCs for PRO collection.


Disclosure: T. Grader-Beck, None; M. Jones, None; A. M. Orbai, None; C. O. Bingham III, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Grader-Beck T, Jones M, Orbai AM, Bingham III CO. Electronic Delivery of Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaires on Tablet PCs at Clinic Visit: A Feasibility Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/electronic-delivery-of-patient-reported-outcome-questionnaires-on-tablet-pcs-at-clinic-visit-a-feasibility-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/electronic-delivery-of-patient-reported-outcome-questionnaires-on-tablet-pcs-at-clinic-visit-a-feasibility-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology