ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2672

Elderly Patients Risk a False Positive Diagnosis of Primary Sjogren’s Syndrome If a Positive Labial Gland Biopsy Is Solely Based on Focus Score

Erlin A. Haacke1,2, Jolien F. van Nimwegen1, Martha S. van Ginkel1, Suzanne Arends1, Fred K.L. Spijkervet3, Gwenny M. Verstappen1, Nicole Sillevis Smitt-Kamminga4, Arjan Vissink5, Frans G.M. Kroese1, Bert van der Vegt6 and Hendrika Bootsma7, 1Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 2Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 3Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 4Opthalmology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 5Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 6Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 7Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands, Groningen, Netherlands

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: diagnostic criteria and histopathologic, Elderly, Sjogren's syndrome

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Sjögren's Syndrome - Poster II: Clinical Science

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) is a systemic auto-immune disease affecting the exocrine glands leading to sicca complaints. For the diagnosis of pSS, a positive salivary gland biopsy is an important criterion. A salivary gland biopsy can either be obtained from the minor (labial) or major (parotid) salivary gland and is considered positive if focus score (FS) is ≥1. In this study, the parotid gland biopsy (PGB) and labial gland biopsy (LGB) were compared for their diagnostic value in a prospective diagnostic cohort.

Methods:  The study population consisted of 94 consecutive patients referred to the Sjögren center of expertise at the University Medical Center Groningen. All patients presented with sicca complaints and had a complete diagnostic workup for suspicion of pSS according to the American European Consensus Group (AECG) criteria. As part of the routine diagnostic workup a PGB was taken. In addition, patients consented for a simultaneous LGB. Biopsies were assessed for FS and presence of lymphoepithelial lesions (LELs).

Results:  Of the included 94 patients (mean age (yr) 49.9 SD 13.9), 39 patients were classified as pSS according to the AECG criteria. In the patients classified as pSS, 18 patients (46%) had both salivary gland biopsies positive. In 14 patients (36%) only the LGB was positive, while in 3 patients (8%) only the PGB was positive and 4 patients (10%) both biopsies were negative. Using the AECG criteria, including salivary gland histology, the PGB had a higher specificity (95% vs 88%), but lower sensitivity (54% vs 82%) than the LGB. Patients classified as pSS, according to the AECG criteria, with both salivary gland biopsies positive, were all anti-SSA positive. Of the 14 patients classified as pSS with solely a positive LGB, 9 patients (64%) would not have been classified as pSS according to the AECG criteria if the biopsy had been negative, since these patients all lacked SSA or SSB autoantibodies. In the small group of three patients classified as pSS with a positive PGB and negative LGB, two patients were anti-SSA positive and the remaining anti-SSA negative patient (33%) would not have been classified as pSS if the biopsy was negative. The 4 classified pSS patients with both salivary gland biopsies negative were all anti-SSA positive. Thus, a positive LGB positively influenced the classification as pSS stronger than a positive PGB. Strikingly, although all 14 patients with solely a positive LGB showed a FS≥1, none of these LGBs harbored LELs. In comparison, if both salivary gland biopsies were positive, LELs were found in 79% of the LGBs. Patients with a positive LGB, but negative PGB were significantly older than patients with a positive PGB (57.0yr versus 47.2yr, t-test p=0.021).

Conclusion:  This study suggests that anti-SSA negative elderly patients, with a positive labial gland biopsy based upon FS≥1, are at risk of being falsely diagnosed as pSS, since these labial gland biopsies all lack LELs. We therefore propose that LELs are taken into account in elderly patients besides FS≥1. A parotid gland biopsy is more specific and might be recommended especially in elderly patients without SSA antibodies, suspected for pSS.


Disclosure: E. A. Haacke, None; J. F. van Nimwegen, None; M. S. van Ginkel, None; S. Arends, None; F. K. L. Spijkervet, None; G. M. Verstappen, None; N. Sillevis Smitt-Kamminga, None; A. Vissink, None; F. G. M. Kroese, None; B. van der Vegt, None; H. Bootsma, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Haacke EA, van Nimwegen JF, van Ginkel MS, Arends S, Spijkervet FKL, Verstappen GM, Sillevis Smitt-Kamminga N, Vissink A, Kroese FGM, van der Vegt B, Bootsma H. Elderly Patients Risk a False Positive Diagnosis of Primary Sjogren’s Syndrome If a Positive Labial Gland Biopsy Is Solely Based on Focus Score [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/elderly-patients-risk-a-false-positive-diagnosis-of-primary-sjogrens-syndrome-if-a-positive-labial-gland-biopsy-is-solely-based-on-focus-score/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/elderly-patients-risk-a-false-positive-diagnosis-of-primary-sjogrens-syndrome-if-a-positive-labial-gland-biopsy-is-solely-based-on-focus-score/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology