ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2557

Efficacy of Ustekinumab on Spondylitis-Associated Endpoints in TNF-Naïve Active Psoriatic Arthritis Patients with Physician-Reported Spondylitis

Philip Helliwell1, Dafna D Gladman2, Soumya D Chakravarty3, Shelly Kafka4, Chetan S Karyekar4, Yin You5, Arthur Kavanaugh6 and Lianne S. Gensler7, 1Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, UK, Leeds, United Kingdom, 2Department of Medicine, Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Research Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC/Drexel University School of Medicine, Horsham/Phila, PA, 4Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, 5Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 6University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, 7University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, arthritis and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster III: Treatment

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: In PSUMMIT 1&2, Phase 3 trials of ustekinumab (UST) in adults w/ active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), 30.1% & 22.4% of patients (pts) had peripheral arthritis w/ physician-reported spondylitis (PA‑PRS), respectively. To evaluate the proportion of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-naïve pts w/ PA-PRS from pooled data in PSUMMIT 1&2 treated w/ UST achieving Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) responses and other axial disease response measures.

Methods: Pts had active PsA (≥5 swollen& tender joints, CRP ≥3.0mg/L) for ≥6 mo despite treatment w/ csDMARDs &/or NSAIDs (PSUMMIT 1&2) &/or anti-TNF agents (PSUMMIT 2). In both studies, pts were randomized to SC injections of placebo (PBO) or UST 45mg or 90mg at wks 0, 4 & every 12 wks. PBO pts crossed over to UST 45mg at wk24. At wk16, early escape (PBOàUST45mg; UST45mgàUST90mg; UST90mgàUST90mg) was possible. The proportion of pts achieving ASDAS responses of inactive disease (<1.3), major improvement (decrease ≥2.0), & clinically important improvement (decrease ≥1.1) at wks 12 & 24 were calculated. Modified Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (mBASDAI) scores were calculated at wks 12 & 24 (based upon BASDAI w/o Q#3).

Results: Of 747 TNF-naïve pooled pts, 223 had PsA w/ PA-PRS. For the PA-PRS subset, baseline mean scores included BASDAI 6.57 (UST 45mg), 6.60 (UST 90mg), and 6.37 (PBO); ASDAS 3.86 (UST 45mg), 3.90 (UST 90mg), 3.68 (PBO); BASDAI Q#2 6.62 (UST 45mg), 6.84 (UST 90mg), 6.14 (PBO); and mBASDAI 6.52 (UST 45mg), 6.56 (UST 90mg), 6.27 (PBO). A numerically greater change from baseline in mBASDAI was achieved in both UST 45mg & 90mg groups vs PBO at both wks 12 and 24 (Table 1). Additionally, significantly greater proportions of pts in both UST 45mg & 90mg groups vs PBO achieved ASDAS inactive disease by wk24 (Table 2). Similarly, by wk24, significantly greater proportions of pts in both 45mg & 90mg UST groups vs PBO achieved ASDAS major improvement and clinically important improvement.

Conclusion: Approximately half of UST-treated PA-PRS pts attained meaningful improvements in ASDAS by wk24, and similar numerically greater changes from baseline were observed in mBASDAI. These results are limited and should be interpreted with caution as this was a heterogenous patient group in the absence of definitive imaging, and improvements in extra-axial domains, such as peripheral arthritis and enthesitis, may have contributed to the changes in ASDAS and mBASDAI scores. Further research is needed to examine the efficacy of UST in treatment of spondylitis in PsA patients.


 

Table 1. Mean change from baseline in mBASDAIa in PA-PRS subset at wk 12 & 24 in PSUMMIT 1&2

 

PBO

UST 45mg

UST 90mg

UST Combined

PA-PRS Subset, n

84

66

73

139

Wk 12, n

Mean change (SD)

77

-0.52 (1.47)

61

-1.81 (1.84)

70

-1.78 (2.11)

131

-1.79 (1.98)

Wk 24, n

Mean change (SD)

71

-0.59 (1.58)

63

-1.73 (2.13)

69

-2.41 (2.20)

132

-2.09 (2.18)

BASDAI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; mBASDAI=modified BASDAI; PA-PRS=peripheral arthritis with physician-reported spondylitis; PBO=placebo; SD=standard deviation; UST=ustekinumab

amBASDAI scores were calculated based on the BASDAI with question #3 removed (0.25[F+S+E+0.5×DURATION]).

 

Table 2. PA-PRS subset achieving ASDAS responses at wk 12&24 in PSUMMIT 1&2

 

PBO

UST 45mg

UST 90mg

UST Combined

PA-PRS Subset, n

84

66

73

139

Wk 12, ASDAS, n

78

61

70

131

ASDAS <1.3, inactive disease, n (%)

2 (2.6)

4 (6.6)

5 (7.1)

9 (6.9)

ASDAS improvement, n

77

60

70

130

Major improvement, decrease ≥2.0, n (%)

2 (2.6)

8 (13.3)

10 (14.3)

18 (13.8)

Clinically important improvement, decrease ≥1.1, n (%)

9 (11.7)

25 (41.7)

29 (41.4)

54 (41.5)

Wk 24, ASDAS, n

72

64

69

133

ASDAS <1.3, inactive disease, n (%)

0 (0)

4 (6.3)***

8 (11.6)**

12 (9.0)**

ASDAS improvement, n

71

62

69

131

Major improvement, decrease ≥2.0, n (%)

1 (1.4)

9 (14.5)**

19 (27.5)*

28 (21.4)*

Clinically important improvement, decrease ≥1.1, n (%)

9 (12.7)

27 (43.5)*

38 (55.1)*

65 (49.6)*

ASDAS=Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; PA-PRS=peripheral arthritis with physician-reported spondylitis; PBO=placebo; UST=ustekinumab

*p<0.001; **p<0.01; ***p<0.05

 


Disclosure: P. Helliwell, Janssen Research & Development, LLC., 2; D. D. Gladman, Janssen Research and Development, LLC, 2; S. D. Chakravarty, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 3; S. Kafka, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 3; C. S. Karyekar, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; Y. You, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 3; A. Kavanaugh, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2; L. S. Gensler, Janssen Research and Development, LLC, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Helliwell P, Gladman DD, Chakravarty SD, Kafka S, Karyekar CS, You Y, Kavanaugh A, Gensler LS. Efficacy of Ustekinumab on Spondylitis-Associated Endpoints in TNF-Naïve Active Psoriatic Arthritis Patients with Physician-Reported Spondylitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-ustekinumab-on-spondylitis-associated-endpoints-in-tnf-naive-active-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-with-physician-reported-spondylitis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-ustekinumab-on-spondylitis-associated-endpoints-in-tnf-naive-active-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-with-physician-reported-spondylitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology