ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1356

Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Stratified by Number of Prior Biologic Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs

Philip Mease1, Apinya Lertratanakul2, Bruce Strober3, Shigeyoshi Tsuji4, Pascal Richette5, Charlie Lovan6, Dai Feng2, Jaclyn K Anderson2 and Filip Van den Bosch7, 1Seattle Rheumatology Associates, P.L.L.C., Seattle, WA, 2AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 3Yale University School of Medicine and Central Connecticut Dermatology, New Haven, 4Department of Orthopaedics/Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization, Osaka Minami Medical Center, Osaka, Japan, 5Department of Rheumatology, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France, 6AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, 7Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Upadacitinib (UPA) has shown efficacy and safety in patients (pts) with active PsA in the Phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 and SELECT-PsA 2 clinical trials.1,2 Historically efficacy has been lower with second- and third-line therapy compared with first-line anti-TNF therapy in PsA;3,4 however, clinical trial data that describe efficacy in pts who have had an inadequate response (IR) to multiple biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) are limited. This analysis assessed the effects of prior bDMARD failure on UPA efficacy in the SELECT-PsA 2 trial.

Methods: The SELECT-PsA 2 study enrolled pts with prior IR or intolerance to ≥1 bDMARD (N=642). Pts were randomized to placebo (PBO), UPA 15 mg once daily (QD, UPA15), or UPA 30 mg QD (UPA30). Stable background treatment of ≤2 non-bDMARDs was permitted; background therapy was not required. Only the pts who had IR to ≥1 bDMARD were included in this analysis; pts were subgrouped based on the number of bDMARDs failed prior to enrollment (1, 2, or ≥3). This analysis includes assessment of proportion of pts achieving ACR20/50/70, and change in HAQ-DI, FACIT-Fatigue, and SF-36 Physical Component Summary at Wk 12; static Investigator Global Assessment of Psoriasis of 0 or 1 and at least a 2-point improvement from baseline, PASI75, and change in Self-Assessment of Psoriasis Symptoms at Wk 16; and proportion of pts achieving minimal disease activity (MDA) at Wk 24. Non-responder imputation was used for binary endpoints. Mixed-effects model for repeated measures was used for continuous endpoints. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the PBO subtracted treatment effect were calculated.

Results: 641 pts were randomized and received study drug; 92% were bDMARD-IR: 391 (61%) of pts failed 1 bDMARD, 116 (18%) failed 2 bDMARDs, and 83 (13%) failed ≥3 bDMARDs.

In the overall study population, UPA15 and UPA30 demonstrated superiority vs placebo for all endpoints evaluated. In this post hoc analysis, the PBO subtracted treatment effect demonstrates generally consistent efficacy as compared to the overall study population for UPA15 and UPA30 across efficacy endpoints in the subgroups of pts with IR to 1, 2, or ≥3 prior bDMARDs (Figure). Due to limited sample sizes for pts with IR to >1 bDMARD and the pt subsets analyzed for psoriasis-related endpoints, results should be interpreted with caution.

Conclusion: Upadacitinib demonstrated consistent efficacy in treating clinical manifestations of PsA including musculoskeletal symptoms, psoriasis, physical function, fatigue, and quality of life in pts with IR to 1 or multiple prior bDMARDs. In addition, comprehensive disease control as measured by MDA, was generally consistently achieved with upadacitinib regardless of number of prior bDMARDs tried.

References

1. McInnes IB, et al. Ann Rheum Dis, 2020; 79:12.
2. Genovese MC, et al. Ann Rheum Dis, 2020; 79:139.
3. Costa L, et al. Drugs R D. 2017;17:509‐522.
4. Reddy SM, et al. 2016;35:2955‐2966.


Disclosure: P. Mease, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 8, Sun, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Gilead, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Galapagos, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5; A. Lertratanakul, AbbVie Inc., 1, 3; B. Strober, AbbVie Inc., 1, 2, Amgen, 1, 2, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, Janssen, 1, 2, Ortho Dermatologics, 1, 2, Corrona Psoriasis Registry, 1, Almirall, 1, Arcutis, 1, Arena, 1, Aristea, 1, Boehringer Ingelheim, 1, Bristol Myers Squibb, 1, Celgene, 1, Dermavant, 1, Dermira, 1, Leo, 1, Meiji Seika Pharma, 1, Novartis, 1, Pfizer, 1, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, UCB Pharma, 1, Sun Pharma, 1, Regeneron, 1, Sanofi-Genzyme, 1, Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis, 1, Dermavant, AbbVie, Corrona Psoriasis Registry, Dermira, Cara, Novartis, 1; S. Tsuji, AbbVie Inc., 1, Asahi Kasei, 1, Chugai, 1, Daiichi Sankyo, 1, Eli Lilly, 1, Eisai, 1, Mitsubishi Tanabe, 1, Celgene, 1, Novartis Pharma K.K., 1; P. Richette, AbbVie Inc., 1, Biogen, 1, Janssen, 1, BMS, 1, Roche, 1, Pfizer, 1, Amgen, 1, Sanofi-Aventis, 1, UCB, 1, Lilly, 1, Novartis, 1, Celgene, 1; C. Lovan, AbbVie Inc., 1, 3; D. Feng, AbbVie Inc., 1, 2; J. Anderson, AbbVie Inc., 1, 3, 4; F. Van den Bosch, AbbVie, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Galapagos, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Gilead, 5, Merck, 5, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mease P, Lertratanakul A, Strober B, Tsuji S, Richette P, Lovan C, Feng D, Anderson J, Van den Bosch F. Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Stratified by Number of Prior Biologic Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-upadacitinib-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-stratified-by-number-of-prior-biologic-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-upadacitinib-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-stratified-by-number-of-prior-biologic-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology