ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 615

Efficacy of Tofacitinib By Background Methotrexate Dose in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: A Post Hoc Analysis of Pooled Data from 2 Phase 3 Trials

Alan J. Kivitz1, Oliver FitzGerald2, Peter Nash3, Shirley Pang4, Valderilio F Azevedo5, Elizabeth Kudlacz6, Cunshan Wang6, Daniela Graham6 and Liza Takiya7, 1Department of Rheumatology, Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, 2Department of Rheumatology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, 3Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Australia, 4St. Jude Medical Center, Fullerton, CA, 5Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil, 6Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, 7Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: methotrexate (MTX), psoriatic arthritis and tofacitinib

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor under investigation for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The efficacy of tofacitinib has been evaluated in 2 Phase 3 studies in patients (pts) with PsA. In this analysis, we describe the efficacy of tofacitinib by background methotrexate (MTX) dose in pts with PsA.

Methods: This post hoc analysis utilized efficacy data pooled from 2 Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (OPAL Broaden [12 months; NCT01877668] and OPAL Beyond [6 months; NCT01882439]) in pts with a diagnosis (≥6 months) of active PsA (≥3 swollen and ≥3 tender joints). Pts in OPAL Broaden were tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)-naïve and had an inadequate response (IR) to ≥1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD). Pts in OPAL Beyond had an IR to ≥1 TNFi. Pts were randomized to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID), placebo, or adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous every 2 weeks (OPAL Broaden; adalimumab data not shown). All pts received a stable dose of 1 csDMARD (eg MTX, leflunomide, or sulfasalazine) as background therapy. The maximum dose of MTX allowed per protocol was 20 mg/week. Efficacy outcomes for tofacitinib at Month 3 were evaluated by background MTX dose (≤15 vs >15 mg/week) and included: ACR20/50/70 response rates (≥20/50/70% improvement from baseline, respectively), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) response rate (reduction from baseline ≥0.35 points), and mean change from baseline in HAQ-DI score. Analyses were based on the full analysis set for pts receiving MTX on Day 1; pts with missing data were considered as having a non-response for binary endpoints. No statistical testing was performed.

Results: In total, data from 556 pts who received tofacitinib plus MTX only or placebo plus MTX only (tofacitinib 5 mg BID, n=186; tofacitinib 10 mg BID, n=178; placebo, n=192) were included in this analysis. Most pts were treated with background MTX at doses ≤15 mg/week (n=371, 66.7%; mean [SD] dose, 12.6 [3.1] mg/week) vs >15 mg/week (n=185, 33.3%; mean [SD] dose, 19.8 [0.8] mg/week). Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally similar between arms in MTX dose groups (Table). At Month 3, tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID were generally associated with numerically greater ACR and HAQ-DI response rates and greater changes from baseline in HAQ-DI score compared with placebo. The magnitude of tofacitinib effects on efficacy outcomes appeared broadly similar between background MTX dose groups (Table).

Conclusion: The results of this pooled analysis suggest that the efficacy of tofacitinib in pts with PsA was greater than placebo and does not differ when evaluated by background MTX dose (≤15 vs >15 mg/week), although small pt numbers in some groups may limit the conclusions that can be made. These results are consistent with findings from similar analyses of tofacitinib in pts with rheumatoid arthritis.


Disclosure: A. J. Kivitz, AbbVie, Genentech, Genzyme, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Sanofi, UCB, 5,Celgene, Genentech, Genzyme, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Sanofi, 8; O. FitzGerald, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, 2,Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, 5; P. Nash, None; S. Pang, None; V. F. Azevedo, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Genentech, GSK, Pfizer Inc, UCB, 2,AbbVie, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, 5,AbbVie, Janssen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Sanofi, 8; E. Kudlacz, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; C. Wang, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; D. Graham, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; L. Takiya, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kivitz AJ, FitzGerald O, Nash P, Pang S, Azevedo VF, Kudlacz E, Wang C, Graham D, Takiya L. Efficacy of Tofacitinib By Background Methotrexate Dose in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: A Post Hoc Analysis of Pooled Data from 2 Phase 3 Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-tofacitinib-by-background-methotrexate-dose-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-pooled-data-from-2-phase-3-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-tofacitinib-by-background-methotrexate-dose-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-pooled-data-from-2-phase-3-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology