ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3224

Efficacy of Sirukumab, an Anti–IL-6 Cytokine Monoclonal Antibody, Based upon Prior Use of Non-Anti-TNF Biologics in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Anti-TNF Therapy: Results from a Global Phase 3 Study

Yoshiya Tanaka1, Daniel Aletaha2, Clifton Bingham III3, Prasheen Agarwal4, Regina Kurrasch5 and Sharon Popik4, 1University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan, 2Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 3Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 4Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 5GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, PA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Biologics, IL-6 and rheumatoid arthritis, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy V: New Biologics and Remission Induction

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: A global, phase 3 study (SIRROUND-T) evaluating the efficacy and safety of sirukumab, a selective, high-affinity human monoclonal antibody to IL-6, has recently been conducted in patients (pts) with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite anti-TNF therapy.  This post hoc analysis sought to compare the efficacy of sirukumab in subgroups of pts with active RA refractory to anti-TNF treatment who previously also received non-anti-TNF biologic therapy (TNFs + other biologics) and who did not previously receive other biologic therapy, other than anti-TNF biologic therapy (TNF only).  

Methods: Pts were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to sirukumab subcutaneous (SC) 50 mg q4w, sirukumab SC 100 mg q2w, or placebo SC q2w.  Pts on placebo with insufficient (<20%) improvement at Wk 18 or still on placebo at Wk 24 were re-randomized to 1 of the 2 sirukumab doses.  The primary efficacy endpoint was ACR20 response at Wk 16, and major secondary endpoints included change from baseline (BL) in HAQ-DI score at Wk 24, ACR50 response at Wk 24, and DAS28 (CRP) remission at Wk 24.  This post-hoc analysis compared efficacy for TNF only and TNF + biologics pts for sirukumab versus placebo, and across categories within sirukumab dose groups.  

Results: In the placebo, sirukumab 50 mg q4w, and sirukumab 100 mg q2w groups, respectively, 104, 119, and 118 pts had previously received non-anti-TNF biologic therapy, in addition to prior TNF therapy.  Improvements were observed in all outcomes for sirukumab versus placebo, regardless of prior biologic use (Table 1).  Significantly more pts achieved ACR20 at Wk 16 with sirukumab 50 mg q4w and 100 mg q2w compared with placebo (all P £0.003).  Both doses of sirukumab led to significantly greater improvements in HAQ-DI change from BL at Wk 24 than placebo (all P £0.012).  Significantly more pts (TNF only at both sirukumab doses and TNF + biologics taking sirukumab 100 mg q2w) achieved ACR50 and DAS28 (CRP) remission at Wk 24 with sirukumab treatment compared with placebo; TNF + biologics pts on sirukumab 50 mg q4w had only numerically higher rates of ACR50 and DAS28 (CRP) remission at Wk 24 compared with placebo.    

Conclusion: In general, comparable efficacy was observed with both sirukumab doses between pts with active RA despite anti-TNF therapy who had received TNFs only and TNFs + other biologics.


Disclosure: Y. Tanaka, Abbvie, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Astellas, Takeda, Pfizer, Teijin, Asahi-kasei, YL Biologics, Sanofi, Janssen, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, 8,Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Takeda, Daiichi-Sankyo, Chugai, Bristol-Myers, MSD, Astellas, Abbvie, Eisai, 2; D. Aletaha, AbbVie, Pfizer, Grünenthal, Merck Medac, UCB, Mitsubishi/Tanabe, Janssen, and Roche, 2,AbbVie, Pfizer, Grünenthal, Merck Medac, UCB, Mitsubishi/Tanabe, Janssen, and Roche, 5; C. Bingham III, Janssen., 5,Janssen., 2; P. Agarwal, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 1,Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; R. Kurrasch, GlaxoSmithKline, 1,GlaxoSmithKline, 3; S. Popik, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 1,Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tanaka Y, Aletaha D, Bingham C III, Agarwal P, Kurrasch R, Popik S. Efficacy of Sirukumab, an Anti–IL-6 Cytokine Monoclonal Antibody, Based upon Prior Use of Non-Anti-TNF Biologics in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Anti-TNF Therapy: Results from a Global Phase 3 Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-sirukumab-an-anti-il-6-cytokine-monoclonal-antibody-based-upon-prior-use-of-non-anti-tnf-biologics-in-patients-with-active-rheumatoid-arthritis-despite-anti-tnf-therapy-results/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-sirukumab-an-anti-il-6-cytokine-monoclonal-antibody-based-upon-prior-use-of-non-anti-tnf-biologics-in-patients-with-active-rheumatoid-arthritis-despite-anti-tnf-therapy-results/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology