ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 263

Efficacy of Ketoprofen Vs Ibuprofen and Diclofenac: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Fabiola Atzeni1, Pier Carlo Sarzi-Puttini1, Luigi Lanata2 and Michela Bagnasco2, 1Rheumatology Unit, University Hospital L Sacco, Milan, Italy, 2Medical Department, Dompé SpA, Milan, Italy

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Ibuprofen and pain

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoarthritis - Clinical Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose : The management of mild-to-moderate pain has traditionally been based on the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and the synthetic non-opioid analgesic paracetamol (acetaminophen), both of which are effective, widely recommended, and extensively used. Among the NSAIDs, ketoprofen, ibuprofen and diclofenac have been used for the last 30 years. The published placebo-controlled randomised clinical trials (RCTs) do not allow direct comparisons of the various NSAIDs, but meta-analyses can be used to make indirect comparisons that can demonstrate similar (but not identical) drug efficacy.

The aim of this systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was to compare the efficacy of orally administered ketoprofen vs ibuprofen and/or diclofenac.

Methods: The literature was systematically reviewed and search was restricted to randomised clinical trials comparing the efficacy of oral ketoprofen (50-200 mg/day) vs ibuprofen (600-1800 mg/day) or diclofenac (75-150 mg/day) published until June 2011 in the Medline, Cochrane Central and Embase databases. The study selection was made independently by two rheumatologists in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines.

Results:   A total of 13 RCTs involving 898 patients met the inclusion criteria: eight ketoprofen vs ibuprofen and five comparing ketoprofen vs diclofenac. Nine of the 13 RCTs included 544 patients with systemic rheumatic diseases such as RA, OA, ankylosing spondylitis (AS), low back pain or painful shoulder. The difference in efficacy between ketoprofen and ibuprofen/diclofenac was statistically significant (0.459, 95% CI 0.33-0.58; P=0.00) at all point-estimates of the mean weighted size effect (Fig 1). The test of heterogeneity for the efficacy outcome was not statistically significant (c2 = 18.07 – df= 12 – P = 0.1136). Concerning the estimated efficacy outcomes, ketoprofen was superior to ibuprofen/diclofenac in all of the 13 RCTs, reaching a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in nine studies. The heterogeneity for the efficacy outcome was not different across the studies and this guaratees that the compared trials are homogeneous and the meta-analysis results reliable and valid. The meta-analysis showed that the effect of therapeutic doses of ketoprofen was strongly greater than the effect of therapeutic doses of ibuprofen or diclofenac.

Figure 1: the size effect of ketoprofen and ibuprofen/diclofenac.

 

Conclusion : Findings of this meta-analysis support strong recommendation that the efficacy of orally administered ketoprofen in relieving moderate-severe rheumatic pain and in improving functional status and general conditions is significantly better than that of diclofenac/ibuprofen.

 

 

 

 


Disclosure:

F. Atzeni,
None;

P. C. Sarzi-Puttini,

Dompé SpA,

5;

L. Lanata,

Dompé SpA,

3;

M. Bagnasco,

Dompé SpA,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-ketoprofen-vs-ibuprofen-and-diclofenac-a-systematic-review-of-the-literature-and-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology