ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 837

Efficacy of High-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine in Seropositive Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Ines Colmegna1, Mariana Useche2, Katherine Rodriguez3, Marie Hudson4, Sasha Bernatsky5, Hacene Nedjar3, Elham Rahme6 and Brian Ward7, 1The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2Medicine, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada, 3The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada, 4Division of Rheumatology, Jewish General Hospital, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, QC, Canada, 5Divisions of Rheumatology and Clinical Epidemiology, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada, 6Epidemiology, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada, 7Infectious Diseases, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and vaccines

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: 3S037 ACR Abstract: Plenary Session I (835–839)

Session Type: ACR Plenary Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have 2.75 fold increased risk of influenza and influenza-related illness than age-matched healthy controls. For this reason, RA patients are a priority group for annual vaccination. Although vaccination is currently the most effective intervention against influenza and its associated complications, vaccine induced antibody responses and protection in RA are low. It is unknown if the use of a high dose vaccine (high dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine: HD-TIV) can improve protection over that conferred by the standard vaccine (standard dose quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine: SD-QIV) in RA.

Methods: We conducted a treatment-stratified, randomized, modified double-blind, active-controlled trial in adult seropositive RA patients (rheumatoid factor and/or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies) to assess antibody responses to either SD-QIV (15 μg of hemagglutinin (HA) per strain) or HD-TIV (60 μg of HA per strain) (NCT02936180). Subjects were recruited at a tertiary care center during the 2016–2017 (year 1) and the 2017–2018 (year 2) Northern-Hemisphere influenza seasons. They were stratified by the treatment received for 3 months prior to enrolment and during the study: DMARDs (Group 1-G1), anti-cytokine therapy (G2), anti-B-cell therapy and small molecules (G3). Seroconversion (SC) and seroprotection (SP) rates were assessed using pre- (Day 0 – D0) and post-vaccine (D28) serum hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers. SC was defined as at least a four-fold HI antibody increase from D0. SP rate was defined as percent with HI titres ≥1:40 at D28. Vaccine strains were A/HongKong/4801/2014(H3N2), B/Brisbane/60/2008 in Y1/2 with A/California/7/2009(H1N1) in Y1 and A/Michigan/45/2015(H1N1) in Y2.

Results: A total of 279 seropositive RA patients were enrolled. 140 (50.2%) received SD-QIV and 139 (49.8%) received HD-TIV. The mean age (±SD) was 61.0±12.9 and 80% were female. According to treatment, 138 (49.5%) patients were in G1; 92 (33%) in G2 and 49 (17.6%) in G3. SP rates pre-vaccine were comparable between HD-TIV and SD-QIV groups. Overall responses to vaccination were consistently higher with the HD-TIV. SC (H3N2 22.3% vs 8.6%; B/Bris 44.6% vs 28.6%; H1N1 51.1% vs 30.0%) and SP rates (H3N2 48.5% vs 30.9%; B/Bris 60.9% vs 50.7%; H1N1 80.4% vs 73.5%) were seen in patients that received the HD-TIV compared to the SD-QIV. In logistic regression models including age, vaccine type, treatment (G1, G2 and G3); Charlson comorbidity index, and RA duration; vaccine dose and age were the only predictors of the influenza vaccine seroresponse. Patients that received HD-TIV were 2.8 times more likely to H3N2 seroconvert (odds ratio 2.84; 95% confidence interval 1.38 – 5.87), 2 times more likely to B/Bris seroconvert (1.91; 1.15-3.17), and 2.3 times more likely to H1N1 seroconvert (2.33; 1.42-3.85).

Conclusion: In seropositive RA patients, the use of HD-TIV substantially improves the immune response to vaccination compared to SD-QIV. This is the first study documenting a successful intervention to enhance vaccine responses in immunocompromised hosts.


Disclosure: I. Colmegna, None; M. Useche, None; K. Rodriguez, None; M. Hudson, None; S. Bernatsky, None; H. Nedjar, None; E. Rahme, None; B. Ward, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Colmegna I, Useche M, Rodriguez K, Hudson M, Bernatsky S, Nedjar H, Rahme E, Ward B. Efficacy of High-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine in Seropositive Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-high-dose-versus-standard-dose-influenza-vaccine-in-seropositive-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-high-dose-versus-standard-dose-influenza-vaccine-in-seropositive-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology