ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1474

Efficacy of Guselkumab in Bionaive Psoriatic Arthritis Patients with Severe Disease Activity: Post-hoc Analysis of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Christopher Ritchlin1, Ennio Lubrano2, Maria Sole Chimenti3, Evan Leibowitz4, Mohamed Sharaf5, Oyediran Adelakun6, Emmanouil Rampakakis7, Francois Nantel8, Frederic Lavie9 and Atul Deodhar10, 1Department of Medicine, Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology Division, University of Rochester Medical School, Canandaigua, NY, 2Vincenzo Tiberio Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy, 3Rheumatology, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, System Medicine Department, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy, 4Immunology, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, 5Johnson & Johnson, Middle East FZ LLC, Dubai, UAE, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 6Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, 7McGill University, Department of Pediatrics / Scientific Affairs, JSS Medical Research Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada, 8Nantel Medsci Consult, Montreal, QC, Canada, 9Janssen Cilag Global Medical Affairs, Immunology Global Medical Affairs, Issy les Moulineaux, France, 10Division of Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Biologicals, Disease Activity, pain, Psoriatic arthritis, Randomized Trial

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: SpA Including PsA – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: In previous DISCOVER (D)1 and 2 analyses, the fully human IL-23p19-subunit inhibitor guselkumab (GUS) was associated with robust and sustained improvement in PsA signs/symptoms over 52 weeks (W) in subgroups of patients (pts) across several baseline (BL) demographic and disease characteristics.1 GUS efficacy explicitly in PsA pts with severe disease activity (DA) has not been assessed. Here, GUS efficacy through W100 in D2 bionaive PsA pts with severe DA based on a range of composite and pt-reported outcomes was evaluated.

Methods: D2 enrolled bionaive adults with active PsA (≥5 swollen [SJC] and ≥5 tender [TJC] joints, CRP ≥0.6 mg/dL). Pts were randomized (1:1:1) to GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, Q8W; or placebo (PBO)→GUS Q4W at W24. Severe DA was defined based on clinical DA Index for PsA (cDAPSA >28), PsA DA Score (PASDAS >5.4), and pt global assessment (PtGA ≥80 mm) criteria. cDAPSA was the sum of individual scores for SJC, TJC, PtGA, and pt assessment of pain; PASDAS included SJC, TJC, dactylitis and enthesitis scores, CRP, physician global assessment of disease activity, PtGA, and the physical component of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. Least square mean changes from BL for each outcome were estimated with mixed models for repeated measures, adjusted for treatment group, BL outcome levels, and study stratification factors (BL csDMARD use and high-sensitivity serum CRP value).

Results: Of 739 pts, 648 (88%), 639 (86%), and 218 (29%) met the cDAPSA (mean=49.5), PASDAS (mean=6.8), and PtGA (mean=89.0) criteria for severe DA, respectively. BL characteristics were generally consistent across cohorts (Table). Treatment groups were generally balanced across severe DA cohorts, except GUS Q4W pts were more likely to be male and have dactylitis compared with PBO pts (data not shown). In multivariate analyses, irrespective of severe DA cohort, GUS-treated pts experienced significantly greater improvements than PBO pts in all outcomes (largest effect seen in the severe PtGA cohort [Figure]). On average, improvements with GUS were clinically meaningful as of the first assessment timepoint, specifically W2 for cDAPSA (GUS Q4W: -5.9; GUS Q8W: -7.2; PBO: -5.0) and W8 for PASDAS (GUS Q4W: -1.5; GUS Q8W: -1.5; PBO: -0.9) and PtGA (GUS Q4W: -30.0; GUS Q8W: -32.1; PBO: -17.4; Figure). Differences vs PBO were enhanced through W24 across severe DA cohorts, at which time further improvements with GUS Q4W/Q8W were observed, resulting in differences vs PBO of -9.8/-9.0, -1.1/-1.1, -24.0/-20.2 in cDAPSA, PASDAS, and PtGA, respectively. Further improvements in all outcomes (ΔcDAPSA ̴ -36; ΔPASDAS ̴ -3.6; ΔPtGA ̴ ‑56) were observed through 2 years of GUS treatment, representing  ̴73% improvement in joint DA,  ̴53% improvement in PsA activity across domains, and  ̴63% improvement in pt-reported overall DA.

Conclusion: In bionaive PsA pts with severe DA based on joint-focused and multi-domain outcomes, GUS led to rapid (joint: W2; overall DA: W8) clinically meaningful improvements in DA; these improvements were further enhanced by W24 and sustained through 2 years. Findings support the use of GUS to treat PsA pts with severe DA.

1Ritchlin CT. RMD Open. 2022;8:e002195

Supporting image 1

Table. BL Characteristics of PsA Pts With Severe DA

Supporting image 2

Figure. Changes From BL Through 2 Years in cDAPSA, PASDAS, and PtGA Among PsA Pts With Severe DA


Disclosures: C. Ritchlin: AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Lilly, 2, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Solarea, 2, UCB, 2; E. Lubrano: AbbVie, 6, Amgen, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, GlaxoSmithKline, 6, Janssen, 6, Novartis, 6, UCB, 6; M. Chimenti: AbbVie/Abbott, 12, Speaker honoraria and/or unrestrictive research grants, Eli Lilly, 12, Speaker honoraria and/or unrestrictive research grants, Janssen, 12, Speaker honoraria and/or unrestrictive research grants, Novartis, 12, Speaker honoraria and/or unrestrictive research grants, UCB, 12, Speaker honoraria and/or unrestrictive research grants; E. Leibowitz: Janssen, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11; M. Sharaf: Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11; O. Adelakun: Janssen, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11; E. Rampakakis: Janssen, 2, JSS Medical Research, 3; F. Nantel: Janssen, 2, Johnson & Johnson, 11; F. Lavie: Immunology Global Medical Affairs, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11; A. Deodhar: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, BMS, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ritchlin C, Lubrano E, Chimenti M, Leibowitz E, Sharaf M, Adelakun O, Rampakakis E, Nantel F, Lavie F, Deodhar A. Efficacy of Guselkumab in Bionaive Psoriatic Arthritis Patients with Severe Disease Activity: Post-hoc Analysis of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-guselkumab-in-bionaive-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-with-severe-disease-activity-post-hoc-analysis-of-a-phase-3-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-guselkumab-in-bionaive-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-with-severe-disease-activity-post-hoc-analysis-of-a-phase-3-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology