ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2025

Efficacy of Guselkumab, a Monoclonal Antibody That Specifically Binds to the p19 Subunit of IL-23, on Axial-Related Endpoints in Patients with Active PsA with Imaging-Confirmed Sacroiliitis: Week-52 Results from Two Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Studies

Philip Mease1, Philip Helliwell2, Dafna Gladman3, Denis Poddubnyy4, Xenofon Baraliakos5, Soumya Chakravarty6, Alexa Kollmeier7, Elizabeth Hsia8, Xie Xu9, Shihong Sheng10, Prasheen Agarwal10, Bei Zhou10, May Shawi11, Chetan Karyekar12, Kristen Sweet10, Atul Deodhar13 and Désirée van der Heijde14, 1Seattle Rheumatology Associates, P.L.L.C., Seattle, WA, 2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 3Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 5Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany, 6Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA and Drexel University College of Medicine, Horsham, PA, 7Janssen Research & Development, LLC, La Jolla, CA, 8Janssen Research & Development, LLC and University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Spring House, PA, 9Janssen Research & Development, LLC, San Marcos, CA, 10Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 11Janssen Global Services, LLC, Toronto, ON, Canada, 12Janssen Global Services, LLC, Horsham, PA, 13Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 14Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Biologicals, Interleukins, Psoriatic arthritis, Spondylarthropathies

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment II: Emerging Therapies (2023–2027)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-11:50AM

Background/Purpose: Guselkumab (GUS), an interleukin-23 inhibitor, improved axial symptoms of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) through week 24 in a pooled analysis from two phase 3 trials (DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2).1 We now report the efficacy of GUS through 1 year in PsA patients (pts) with imaging-confirmed sacroiliitis in DISCOVER-1&2.

Methods: In DISCOVER-1, 381 pts with active PsA (≥ 3 swollen joints, ≥ 3 tender joints; C-reactive protein ≥ 0.3mg/dL despite standard therapies) and in DISCOVER-2, 739 pts with active PsA (≥ 5 swollen joints, ≥ 5 tender joints, CRP ≥ 0.6mg/dL despite standard therapies) were randomized 1:1:1 to GUS 100mg q4w, GUS 100mg q8w (wk0, wk4, then q8w), or placebo (PBO). PBO pts crossed over to GUS 100mg q4w at wk24. Only pts with sacroiliitis at baseline who had either documented imaging confirmation of sacroiliitis in the past or pelvic radiograph confirmation of sacroiliitis at screening (based on investigators’ judgment) were included in this analysis (pooled data from DISCOVER 1&2). Efficacy was assessed by BASDAI score, BASDAI50, modified BASDAI (mBASDAI; excludes Q#3), spinal pain (BASDAI Q#2), ASDAS(-CRP) score, and ASDAS responses of inactive disease (< 1.3), major improvement (decrease ≥2.0), and clinically important improvement (decrease ≥1.1) through week 52. For response endpoints, pts who met treatment failure rules or had missing data were counted as nonresponders through week 24; pts with missing data were counted as nonresponders from weeks 24-52. For changes in scores, a change of 0 was assigned for treatment failures through week 24, and pts who discontinued or had missing data were set to 0 for weeks 24-52. HLA-B27 was assayed in a subset of 190 of these pts.

Results: 312 pts across both studies presented with imaging confirmed sacroiliitis (PBO, n = 118; GUS q8w, n = 91; GUS q4w, n = 103). At baseline, mean BASDAI and ASDAS scores ranged from 6.5 – 6.6 and 3.9 – 4.0, respectively; 57/190 (30%) pts were HLA-B27+, and 133/190 (70%) were HLA-B27-. Improvements in axial symptoms of PsA were greater in the GUS q4w and q8w groups vs PBO through week 24. The LS mean changes from baseline in BASDAI, spinal pain, mBASDAI, and ASDAS were maintained from week 24 to week 52 in the GUS groups (Table); improvements from baseline to week 52 in the PBO pts who crossed over to GUS were similar to those in the GUS groups. Similar trends were observed for the proportions of pts achieving BASDAI50 (Table) and ASDAS responses of inactive disease, major improvement, and clinically important improvement (Figure) at week 52. Efficacy at week 52 trended similarly between HLA-B27+ and HLA-B27- pts.

Conclusion: Improvements in axial symptoms were maintained through week 52 in GUS-treated pts with active PsA who had imaging-confirmed sacroiliitis.

Reference:

  1. Helliwell P, Gladman D, Poddubnyy D, et al. Efficacy of Guselkumab, a Monoclonal Antibody that Specifically Binds to the p19 Subunit of IL-23, on Endpoints Related to Axial Involvement in Patients with Active PsA with Imaging-Confirmed Sacroiliitis: Week-24 Results from Two Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Studies. EULAR 2020.

Figure. Proportion of patients with ASDAS clinically important improvement, major improvement, and inactive disease


Disclosure: P. Mease, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 8, Sun, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Gilead, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Galapagos, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5; P. Helliwell, AbbVie, 2, 8, Janssen, 2, Pfizer Inc, 8, Celgene, 8, Galapagos, 8, Amgen, 8, Novartis, 2, UCB, 8; D. Gladman, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Gilead, 5, Galapagos, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5; D. Poddubnyy, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 8, MSD, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, BioCad, 5, Gilead, 5, GSK, 5, UCB, 5, 8, BMS, 8; X. Baraliakos, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Chugai, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, Galapagos, 5; S. Chakravarty, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 1, 3; A. Kollmeier, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; E. Hsia, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; X. Xu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; S. Sheng, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; P. Agarwal, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; B. Zhou, Janssen Reserach & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; M. Shawi, Janssen Global Services, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; C. Karyekar, Janssen Global Services, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1, Janssen, 5; K. Sweet, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; A. Deodhar, AbbVie, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Janssen, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, Amgen Inc., 5, Celgene, 5, Galapagos, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2; D. van der Heijde, AbbVie, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Cyxone, 5, Galapagos NV, 5, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 5, UCB Pharma, 5, Amgen Inc., 5, Astellas, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Celgene, 5, Daiichi-Sankyo, 5, Janssen, 5, Merck, 5, Regeneron, 5, Roche, 5, Sanofi, 5, Takeda, 5, Imaging Rheumatology bv, 3, Eisai, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mease P, Helliwell P, Gladman D, Poddubnyy D, Baraliakos X, Chakravarty S, Kollmeier A, Hsia E, Xu X, Sheng S, Agarwal P, Zhou B, Shawi M, Karyekar C, Sweet K, Deodhar A, van der Heijde D. Efficacy of Guselkumab, a Monoclonal Antibody That Specifically Binds to the p19 Subunit of IL-23, on Axial-Related Endpoints in Patients with Active PsA with Imaging-Confirmed Sacroiliitis: Week-52 Results from Two Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-guselkumab-a-monoclonal-antibody-that-specifically-binds-to-the-p19-subunit-of-il-23-on-axial-related-endpoints-in-patients-with-active-psa-with-imaging-confirmed-sacroiliitis-week-52-r/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-guselkumab-a-monoclonal-antibody-that-specifically-binds-to-the-p19-subunit-of-il-23-on-axial-related-endpoints-in-patients-with-active-psa-with-imaging-confirmed-sacroiliitis-week-52-r/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology