ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1343

Efficacy of Biological-Targeted Treatments in MDS-Related Systemic Autoimmune Diseases: Multicenter Retrospective Study of 28 Patients

Guillaume Dervin1, Arsène Mékinian2, Jean-Emmanuel Kahn3, louis Terriou4, Eric Liozon5, Eric Grignano6, odile beyne Rauzy7, Pascal Godmer8, Julien Rossignol9, Geraldine Falgarone10, Laurence Bouillet11, Achille Aouba12, Philippe Guilpain13, David Launay14, jonathan Broner15, jerome gillard16, lionel ades17, clemence salvado18, thierry cardon19, Jean-Charles Piette20, Pierre Fenaux21 and Olivier Fain2, 1Medecine Interne Hopital Saint antoine, Paris, France, 2Service de médecine interne. Hôpital Saint-Antoine., Paris, France, 3Internal Medicine, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France, 4médecine interne CHRU lille, Lille, France, 5Departement of Internal Medicine, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France, 6Internal Medicine, DHUi2B Saint Antoine Hospital, paris, France, 7Medecine interne CHU Purpan, toulouse, France, 8CH Vannes, Vannes, France, 9haematology, paris, France, 10Medecine Interne Hopital Avicenne, Bobigny, France, 11CHU, Grenoble, France, 12Medecine Interne Hopital Necker, Paris, France, 13Medecine interne CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France, 14Service de Médecine Interne, Centre National de Référence des Maladies Systémiques Rares, Hôpital Claude Huriez, CHRU Lille, Lille, France, 15Medecine Interne CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France, 16Medecine Interne CHRU Lons le Saunier, Lons, France, 17Service Hématologie Hopital d'Avicennes, Bobigny, France, 18Service d'hématologie CHU Mondor, Creteil, France, 19Medecine interne CHU Lille, lille, France, 20Internal Medicine, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France, 21Hematologie Hopital Avicenne, Bobigny, France

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: autoimmune diseases and rituximab, Biologics

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: This study analyze the safety and efficiency of biologics (TNF-α antagonists, tocilizumab, rituximab and IL-1 inhibitors) in patients with autoimmune systemic diseases (SAIDs) associated to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Methods: In a French multicenter retrospective study, 28 patients with both MDS and SAID treated with at least one biological-targeted treatment were analyzed. Clinical, biological and overall treatment response was considered as complete (no more symptoms), partial (at least 50% improvement) or non-response. In patients with several lines of treatment, data were analyzed before and at the end of each line and pooled to compare overall response between steroids, DMARDs and biologics

Results: 28 patients with median age 66 [19-85] years, 11% of females were included. MDS most frequent subtypes were CMML (18%), AREB-1 (32%), CRDM (32%), 5q-(7%) with median marrow blasts 2% (0-10), normal karyotype in 12/24 (50%) cases and IPSS 0.5 (0-1). The associated SAIDs were arthritis (undifferentiated and rheumatoid arthritis in 3 (10%) cases each), Behcet’s disease in 2 (7%) cases, cryoglobulinemic vasculitis in 2 (7%) cases, giant cell arteritis in 1 (4%), relapsing polychondritis in 8 (30%) cases, Sweet’s disease in 3 (10%) cases and others (18%). During the follow-up of 3 (1.3-4.5) years, 112 lines of treatments were used, consisting in steroids alone (23%), DMARDs (25%), TNF-α antagonists (15%), anakinra (11%), rituximab (10%) and tocilizumab (7%). The median number of lines was 3 (1-9) and more than 5 lines were used in 13 (46%) of patients. Specific MDS treatment was used for SAIDs in 10 patients (9%) (azacytidine). Considering all 112 lines, overall response (complete and partial) occurred in 54% cases. Comparing the treatments, overall response was noted more frequently under steroids (76%) and rituximab (54%), than DMARDs (45%) and TNF-α antagonists, tocilizumab and anakinra (31%)(p<0.05). Azacytidine allowed 71% response in steroid-dependent SAIDs. Steroid dependence occured in 25 cases with mean steroid dose 27 mg/day (10-120). During the follow-up, 20 (71%) patients presented at least one severe infection. Table 1

N=112

DMARDs

N=29 (26%)

Biologics

N=36 (32%)

 

Rituximab

N=11 (10%)

Steroids

N=26 (24%)

Azacytidine/BMT

N=10 (9%)

Treatments

Steroids

21 (95%)

36 (95%)

11(91%)

25 (100%)

10 (100%)

Prednisone (mg/day) before/at the end

25 (18-38)

25 (15-28)

25 (20-30)

22.5 (10-30)

20 (15-30)

18 (9-24)

60 (40-60)

25 (20-40)

25 (18-28)

20 (5-23)

Type of immunosuppressive agents

MTX 7 (24%)

Anakinra

14 (39%)

–

–

–

 

CYC

4 (13%)

TNF-a antagonists

15 (42%)

–

–

–

 

AZA

4 (13%)

Tocilizumab

7 (19%)

–

–

–

 

MMF

5 (18%)

–

–

–

–

 

CICLO

5 (18%)

–

–

–

–

HCQ

4(14%)

Treatment duration (months)

9 (4-21)

2.5 (1-7)

6 (4-32)

9 (2-12)

8 (3-22)

C-reactive protein level (mg/l) before/at the end

53 (39-140)

18 (3-200)

60 (22-90) /

60 (26-99)

18 (5-50)

30 (7-50)

90 (45-117)

32 (4-90)

53 (36-79)

9 (3-20)

SAID response

SAIDs partial response

1/20 (5%)

8/30(25%)

4/11 (36%)

1/23 (4%)

5/7 (71%)

SAIDs complete response

8/20(40%)

2/30 (6%)

2/11 (18%)

18/23 (78%)

0

SAIDs non response

11/20 (55%)

21/30 (69%)

5/10 (46%)

4/23 (18%)

2/7 (29%)

Conclusion: This nationwide study demonstrates the efficiency of steroids for SAID associated to MDS, the frequency of steroid dependence and poor response to biologics, except rituximab. The efficiency of azacytidine for MDS-related SAIDs should be considered in patients with inefficacy of other strategies and steroid dependence.


Disclosure: G. Dervin, None; A. Mékinian, None; J. E. Kahn, None; L. Terriou, None; E. Liozon, None; E. Grignano, None; O. beyne Rauzy, None; P. Godmer, None; J. Rossignol, None; G. Falgarone, None; L. Bouillet, None; A. Aouba, None; P. Guilpain, None; D. Launay, None; J. Broner, None; J. gillard, None; L. ades, None; C. salvado, None; T. cardon, None; J. C. Piette, None; P. Fenaux, None; O. Fain, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dervin G, Mékinian A, Kahn JE, Terriou L, Liozon E, Grignano E, beyne Rauzy O, Godmer P, Rossignol J, Falgarone G, Bouillet L, Aouba A, Guilpain P, Launay D, Broner J, gillard J, ades L, salvado C, cardon T, Piette JC, Fenaux P, Fain O. Efficacy of Biological-Targeted Treatments in MDS-Related Systemic Autoimmune Diseases: Multicenter Retrospective Study of 28 Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-biological-targeted-treatments-in-mds-related-systemic-autoimmune-diseases-multicenter-retrospective-study-of-28-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-biological-targeted-treatments-in-mds-related-systemic-autoimmune-diseases-multicenter-retrospective-study-of-28-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology