ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2785

Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab, an Interleukin-12/23 Inhibitor, in Patients with Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: 1-Year Results of a Phase 2, Randomized Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study

Ronald van Vollenhoven1, Bevra H Hahn2, George C Tsokos3, Carrie Wagner4, Peter Lipsky5, Benjamin Hsu4, Marc Chevrier4, Robert Gordon4, Kim Hung Lo4, Manon Triebel6, Kaiyin Fei4 and Shawn Rose4, 1Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center ARC, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 3Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA, 4Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 5AMPEL BioSolutions and RILITE Research Institute, Charlottesville, VA, 6Janssen Biologics Europe, Leiden, Netherlands

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease Activity, interleukins (IL) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: 5T046 ACR Abstract: Plenary Session III (2785–2790)

Session Type: ACR Plenary Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Both the IL-12 and IL-23 pathways have been linked to SLE pathogenesis. The anti-IL-12/23 p40 monoclonal antibody ustekinumab (UST), which is approved for psoriasis, PsA, and Crohn’s disease, was evaluated in patients with active SLE. We previously reported greater improvement with UST vs PBO in several SLE disease measures through wk24.1 Results through 1 year are reported here.

Methods: We conducted a phase 2, PBO-controlled study in 102 patients with seropositive SLE, defined by SLICC criteria and active disease (SLEDAI score ≥6 and ≥1 BILAG A and/or ≥2 BILAG B scores). Patients were randomized (3:2) to UST (6 mg/kg single IV loading dose, then 90 mg SC q8w beginning at wk8) or PBO, added to standard care. At wk24, PBO patients crossed over to UST (90 mg SC q8w). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving SLE response index (SRI)-4 response at wk24. Modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analyses across SLE disease activity measures were performed to evaluate for maintenance of response with UST between wk24 and wk48. Safety was assessed through wk56.

Results: SRI-4 response rate was significantly greater (p=0.0057) in the UST group (61.7%) vs PBO group (33.3%) in the wk24 primary endpoint analysis and was sustained at 1 year (63.3%) in the UST group (Table 1). Rates of SLEDAI-2K (65% at wk24 vs 66.7% at 1 year), PGA (67.9% at wk24 vs 75% at 1 year), and active joint (86.5% at wk24 vs 86.5% at 1 year) responses were also sustained from wk24 to 1 year in the UST group (Table 1). CLASI response rate plateaued by wk28 (53.1% at wk24 vs 67.7% at wk28) and was maintained through 1 year in the UST group (68.6%) (Table 1). Among PBO patients who crossed over to UST at wk24 (n=33), 54.5% achieved an SRI-4 response at 1 year. Of UST-exposed patients, 81.7% had ≥1 TEAE, 15.1% had ≥1 SAE, and 7.5% had ≥1 serious infection through 1 year (Table 2). No deaths, malignancies, opportunistic infections, or tuberculosis cases were observed. Safety events were consistent with the known UST safety profile.

Conclusion: UST provided sustained clinical benefit in global and organ-specific SLE activity measures through 1 year, with a safety profile consistent with other indications. Thus, UST may be an effective therapy for SLE.

Reference: van Vollenhoven R, Hahn BH, Tsokos GC, et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, an interleukin 12/23 inhibitor, in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 ; 69 (Suppl 10).

Table 1. Efficacy results at 24 weeks and 1 year in patients initially randomized to UST

 

UST

 

Week 24

Week 48

Randomized patients (mITT)

60

60

SRI-4 responsea, n/randomized (%)

37/60 (61.7)

38/60 (63.3)

Improvement from baseline in SLEDAI-2K scoreb, n/randomized (%)

39/60 (65.0)

40/60 (66.7)

≥30% improvement from baseline in PGA, n/evaluablec (%)

38/56 (67.9)

39/52 (75.0)

≥50% improvement from baseline in the number of joints with pain and signs of inflammation, n/evaluablec,d (%)

32/37 (86.5)

32/37 (86.5)

≥50% improvement from baseline CLASI activity score, n/evaluablec,e (%)

17/32 (53.1)

24/35 (68.6)

aSRI-4 response was defined as a ≥4-point reduction in SLEDAI-2K total score, no new BILAG A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, and no worsening (<10% increase) from baseline in the PGA of disease activity score

bSLEDAI-2K response defined as ≥4-point improvement from baseline score

cValues for patients meeting treatment failure criteria are set to missing from the point of treatment failure forward

dPatient subpopulation (67% of total population) with ≥4 joints with pain and signs of inflammation at baseline

ePatient subpopulation (60% of total population) with CLASI activity score of ≥4 at baseline

CLASI, Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index; mITT, modified intention‑to‑treat; PBO, placebo; PGA, Physician Global Assessment; SLEDAI-2K, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000; SRI-4, SLE Responder Index-4; UST, ustekinumab; wk, week.

 

 

Table 2. Safety results at 24 weeks and 1 year

 

Placebo-controlled period through Week 24

Exposed to UST through 1 year

 

PBO

UST

Randomized to UST

All UST
(UST + PBO-UST)

Treated patients

42

60

60

93

Patients with ≥1 TEAE

29 (69.0)

47 (78.3)

54 (90.0)

76 (81.7)

Patients with ≥1 SAE

4 (9.5)

5 (8.3)

10 (16.7)

14 (15.1)

Patients with ≥1 infectiona

21 (50.0)

29 (48.3)

40 (66.7)

56 (60.2)

Patients with ≥1 serious infectiona

0 (0)

2 (3.3)

6 (10.0)

7 (7.5)

Patients with ≥1 DCAE

4 (9.5)

4 (6.7)

5 (8.3)

6 (6.5)

All data are presented as n (%).

aBased on infection system organ class

DCAE, adverse event leading to discontinuation; PBO, placebo; PBO-UST, patients who crossed over from PBO to UST at wk24; SAE, serious adverse event; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event; UST, ustekinumab; wk, week.

 


Disclosure: R. van Vollenhoven, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2; B. H. Hahn, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2; G. C. Tsokos, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2; C. Wagner, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; P. Lipsky, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2; B. Hsu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; M. Chevrier, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; R. Gordon, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; K. H. Lo, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; M. Triebel, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; K. Fei, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; S. Rose, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

van Vollenhoven R, Hahn BH, Tsokos GC, Wagner C, Lipsky P, Hsu B, Chevrier M, Gordon R, Lo KH, Triebel M, Fei K, Rose S. Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab, an Interleukin-12/23 Inhibitor, in Patients with Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: 1-Year Results of a Phase 2, Randomized Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-ustekinumab-an-interleukin-12-23-inhibitor-in-patients-with-active-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-1-year-results-of-a-phase-2-randomized-placebo-controlled-crossover-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-ustekinumab-an-interleukin-12-23-inhibitor-in-patients-with-active-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-1-year-results-of-a-phase-2-randomized-placebo-controlled-crossover-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology