ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 512

Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib Monotherapy in MTX-naïve Patients with Early Active RA Receiving Treatment Within 3 Months of Diagnosis: A Post-hoc Analysis of the SELECT-EARLY

Meliha Kapetanovic1, Maria Andersson 2, Alan Friedman 3, Tim Shaw 3, Yanna Song 4, Daniel Aletaha 5, Maya H. Buch 6, Ulf Müller-Ladner 7 and Janet Pope 8, 1Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Section of Rheumatology, Lund and Malmö, Sweden, Lund, Sweden, 2Abbvie AB, Solna, Sweden, 3AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, 4AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA, North Chicago, 5Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 6University of Leeds & NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom, 7Justus Liebig University Gießen, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Campus Kerckhoff, Bad Nauheim, Germany, Gießen, Hessen, Germany, 8Western University, London, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease duration, Early Rheumatoid Arthritis, Efficacy and safety

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: RA – Treatments Poster I: Novel Treatments

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Early treatment of RA within the therapeutic window (0-3 months from symptom onset), has been associated with improved clinical outcomes and physical function. However, ≤42% of RA patients (pts) visit a rheumatologist within 90 days of symptom onset1,2. Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral, reversible, potent JAK-1 selective inhibitor3 demonstrated efficacy in pts with moderate to severely active RA who were MTX‑naïve or had an inadequate response to csDMARDs/bDMARDs4-6.

Methods: In SELECT–EARLY, MTX-naïve pts with active RA and poor prognosis were randomized 1:1:1 to once‑daily UPA monotherapy at 15 or 30 mg or weekly MTX (titrated up to 20 mg/week through Week 8). Efficacy (including ACR, DAS28(CRP), CDAI responses and change in mTSS) and safety outcomes from a post-hoc analysis of patients who received treatment within 90 days from diagnosis are reported here. The statistical significance defined as p< 0.05 was exploratory in nature.

Results: A total of 270 pts commenced treatment within 90 days from RA diagnosis (median: 44 days [11, 89]). Pts in each arm were mostly female (70%), had moderately to severely active RA with mean DAS28(CRP) =5.9±1.02, had structural joint damage (mean mTSS =7.7±21.5) and were seropositive for both ACPA and RF at baseline (72%)4. At Week 24, compared to MTX, significantly greater proportions of pts receiving UPA 15 or 30 mg monotherapy achieved efficacy outcomes including ACR20, 50 and 70 responses, DAS28CRP< 2.6, CDAI≤2.8 or Boolean remission. Improvements in physical function (HAQ-DI) and decrease in pain were also significantly greater in pts receiving UPA 15 and 30 mg vs MTX at Week 24. Treatment with UPA was also associated with a greater inhibition of structural joint damage compared with MTX (Table 1). Safety outcomes were consistent with the full study and the integrated safety analysis (all phase 3 studies of UPA). Compared to MTX, higher frequencies of serious infections and herpes zoster were reported in both UPA groups. There were 2 deaths in total (UPA 30 mg: 1 due to cardiovascular death and 1 due to pneumonia and sepsis) (Table 2).

Conclusion: In RA pts, early initiation of treatment with UPA 15 mg and 30 mg monotherapy within 3 months from diagnosis was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in efficacy, including remission and inhibition of progression of structural joint damage compared to MTX. The safety profile was consistent with the overall study and the integrated phase 3 safety analysis7. UPA was more effective than MTX in enabling more patients to reach their treatment targets of remission or low disease activity when treated within 3 months of diagnosis.

References:

  1. Raza K et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(10):1822-5.
  2. Stack RJ et al. BMJ Open. 2019;9:
  3. Parmentier et al. BMC Rheumatol. 2018;2:23.
  4. van Vollenhoven R et al, Arth Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (s10) [Abs ACR2018].
  5. Burmester GR et al. Lancet 2018;391:2503-12.
  6. Genovese MC et al, Lancet 2018;391:2513-24.
  7. Cohen S et al, Ann Rheum Dis [Abs EULAR2019].


Table 1


Table 2


Disclosure: M. Kapetanovic, Abbvie, 5, Pfizer, 2; M. Andersson, Abbvie, 1, 4; A. Friedman, AbbVie, 1, 3, Abbvie, 1, 4; T. Shaw, Abbvie, 1, 4, AbbVie, 3, 4; Y. Song, AbbVie, 3, 4, Abbvie, 1, 4; D. Aletaha, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche, 5, AbbVie, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and Roche., 2, Amgen, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and UCB, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 5, 8, Medac, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, Merck Sharp and Dohme, 2, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Sandoz, 5, 8, Sanofi/Genzyme, 5, 8, UCB, 8; M. Buch, AbbVie, 5, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Sandoz, and Sanofi., 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Pfizer, 2, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, 2, Roche, 2, Sandoz, 5, Sanofi, 5, UCB, 2; U. Müller-Ladner, None; J. Pope, AbbVie, 5, Abbvie, 5, Actelion, 5, Actellion, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, Astra-Zeneca, 2, Bayer, 2, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Eicos Sciences, 5, Eli Lilly & Company, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, EMERALD, 5, Emerald, 5, Genzyme, 5, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 5, Merck, 2, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, Sandoz, 5, Sanofi, 5, Seattle Genetics, 2, UCB, 2, 5, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kapetanovic M, Andersson M, Friedman A, Shaw T, Song Y, Aletaha D, Buch M, Müller-Ladner U, Pope J. Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib Monotherapy in MTX-naïve Patients with Early Active RA Receiving Treatment Within 3 Months of Diagnosis: A Post-hoc Analysis of the SELECT-EARLY [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-upadacitinib-monotherapy-in-mtx-naive-patients-with-early-active-ra-receiving-treatment-within-3-months-of-diagnosis-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-the-select-early/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-upadacitinib-monotherapy-in-mtx-naive-patients-with-early-active-ra-receiving-treatment-within-3-months-of-diagnosis-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-the-select-early/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology