ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 888

Efficacy and Safety of the Novel Oral Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitor, Peficitinib (ASP015K), in a Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study of Patients with RA Who Had an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

Tsutomu Takeuchi1, Yoshiya Tanaka2, Sakae Tanaka3, Atsushi Kawakami4, Manabu Iwasaki5, Mitsuhiro Rokuda6, Hiroyuki Izutsu6, Satoshi Ushijima6, Yuichiro Kaneko6, Teruaki Shiomi6 and Emi Yamada6, 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 2University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan, 3Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan, 4University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, 5Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan, 6Astellas Pharma, Inc., Tokyo, Japan

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Janus kinase (JAK), methotrexate (MTX), randomized trials and rheumatoid arthritis, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: 3S087 ACR Abstract: RA–Treatments I: JAK Inhibitors (886–891)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Peficitinib (ASP015K), a novel oral JAK inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy as once-daily monotherapy in patients with moderate-to-severe RA in a phase 2b study (NCT01649999)1. We report phase 3 efficacy and safety data for peficitinib–methotrexate (MTX) combination in patients with RA who had an inadequate response to MTX (NCT02305849).

Methods: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo (PBO)-controlled study was conducted in Japan. Patients had RA diagnosed within the past 10 years (1987 ACR or 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria), active disease (≥6 tender and painful joints and ≥6 swollen joints, using 68 and 66-joint assessment respectively; CRP ≥1.0 mg/dL; bone erosion; and ACPA or RF positivity) and inadequate response to MTX (administered for ≥90 days; ≥8 mg/week for ≥28 days prior to baseline). Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to 52-week MTX plus PBO, peficitinib 100 mg/day or peficitinib 150 mg/day. At week 12, inadequate responders in the PBO group (<20% improvement from baseline in tender and swollen joint counts) were switched (under blinded conditions) to peficitinib 100/150 mg until end of treatment. Remaining patients in the PBO group were switched (under blinded conditions) to peficitinib at week 28. Concomitant stable MTX dose (≤16 mg/week) was mandatory. Primary efficacy variables were ACR20 response rate at week 12/early termination (ET) and change from baseline in modified Total Sharp score (mTSS) at week 28/ET.

Results: 519 patients were treated: PBO (n=170), peficitinib 100 mg (n=175) and peficitinib 150 mg (n=174). At week 12, 75 PBO-treated patients were switched to peficitinib 100 mg (n=37) and 150 mg (n=38) due to inadequate response. At week 12/ET, peficitinib showed superior efficacy vs PBO with respect to symptoms and inflammatory markers (Table 1). At weeks 28 and 52, peficitinib significantly reduced the mean mTSS change from baseline vs PBO (Table 1). Week 0–12 safety results were similar for PBO and peficitinib (Table 2). For the overall study period, incidence rate of serious infections per 100 patient-years was higher with peficitinib 100 mg/150 mg than PBO (Table 2).

Conclusion: In patients with RA who had an inadequate response to MTX, peficitinib 100 mg/day and 150 mg/day demonstrated significant superiority vs PBO in reducing RA symptoms and suppressing joint destruction, according to primary efficacy variables (ACR response and change in mTSS). Peficitinib 100 mg and 150 mg showed acceptable safety and tolerability, with no new safety signals compared with other JAK inhibitors.

1. Takeuchi T, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75: 1057–64



Disclosure: T. Takeuchi, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 2, 5, 9; Y. Tanaka, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 2, 5, 9; S. Tanaka, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 2, 5, 9; A. Kawakami, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 2, 5, 8, 9; M. Iwasaki, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 9; M. Rokuda, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 3, 9; H. Izutsu, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 3, 9; S. Ushijima, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 3, 9; Y. Kaneko, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 3, 9; T. Shiomi, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 3, 9; E. Yamada, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 3, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Takeuchi T, Tanaka Y, Tanaka S, Kawakami A, Iwasaki M, Rokuda M, Izutsu H, Ushijima S, Kaneko Y, Shiomi T, Yamada E. Efficacy and Safety of the Novel Oral Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitor, Peficitinib (ASP015K), in a Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study of Patients with RA Who Had an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-the-novel-oral-janus-kinase-jak-inhibitor-peficitinib-asp015k-in-a-phase-3-double-blind-placebo-controlled-randomized-study-of-patients-with-ra-who-had-an-inadequate-re-2/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-the-novel-oral-janus-kinase-jak-inhibitor-peficitinib-asp015k-in-a-phase-3-double-blind-placebo-controlled-randomized-study-of-patients-with-ra-who-had-an-inadequate-re-2/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology