ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 887

Efficacy and Safety of the Novel Oral Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitor, Peficitinib (ASP015K), in a Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study of Patients with RA Who Had an Inadequate Response to Dmards

Yoshiya Tanaka1, Tsutomu Takeuchi2, Sakae Tanaka3, Atsushi Kawakami4, Manabu Iwasaki5, Yeong Wook Song6, Yi-Hsing Chen7, Mitsuhiro Rokuda8, Hiroyuki Izutsu8, Satoshi Ushijima8, Yuichiro Kaneko8, Teruaki Shiomi8 and Emi Yamada8, 1University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan, 2Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 3Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan, 4University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, 5Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan, 6Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), 7Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan, 8Astellas Pharma, Inc., Tokyo, Japan

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: DMARDs, Janus kinase (JAK), randomized trials and rheumatoid arthritis, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: 3S087 ACR Abstract: RA–Treatments I: JAK Inhibitors (886–891)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Peficitinib (ASP015K), a novel oral JAK inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy as once-daily monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe RA in a phase 2b study (NCT01649999). In this phase 3 study (NCT02308163), we report efficacy and safety data for peficitinib alone or in combination with DMARDs in patients with RA who had an inadequate response to DMARDs.

Methods: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo (PBO)-controlled study was conducted in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. All patients had RA diagnosed according to 1987 ACR or 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria. Patients with active RA (defined as ≥6 tender and painful joints and ≥6 swollen joints, using 68 and 66-joint assessment respectively, and CRP >0.50 mg/dL) and inadequate response to DMARDs (administered for ≥90 days) were randomized in a 1:1:1:2 ratio to 52 weeks’ treatment with PBO, peficitinib 100 mg/day, peficitinib 150 mg/day or etanercept 50 mg/week (open-label reference arm). At week 12, patients initially assigned to PBO were switched (under blinded conditions) to either peficitinib 100 mg/day or peficitinib 150 mg/day until end of treatment. Concomitant stable dose of DMARDs was permitted. The primary efficacy variable was ACR20 response rate at week 12/early termination (ET).

Results: In total, 507 patients were randomized and treated: PBO (n=101), peficitinib 100 mg/day (n=104), peficitinib 150 mg/day (n=102) and etanercept (n=200). Regarding efficacy at week 12/ET, significant differences were observed with peficitinib 100 mg/150 mg vs PBO (p<0.001) in the proportion of patients achieving ACR20, ACR50, ACR70 (150 mg/day dose only) and DAS28-CRP <2.6, and for change from baseline to week 12/ET in DAS28-CRP (Table 1). Week 0–12 safety results were similar between treatment groups, while serious adverse events were more common with PBO than other study treatments (Table 2). For the overall study period, the incidence rate of serious infections per 100 patient-years was higher with peficitinib 100 mg/150 mg than PBO (Table 2). There were no deaths during the study.

Conclusion: In patients with RA who had an inadequate response to DMARDs, 100 mg/day and 150 mg/day peficitinib doses significantly reduced RA symptoms according to clinical and patient assessment scores. The proportion of patients achieving the primary efficacy variable (ACR20 at week 12/ET) was significantly greater for both peficitinib doses versus PBO. Peficitinib 100 mg/day and 150 mg/day showed acceptable safety and tolerability, with no new safety signals detected compared with other JAK inhibitors.

 


 


Disclosure: Y. Tanaka, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 2, 5, 9; T. Takeuchi, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 2, 5, 9; S. Tanaka, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 2, 9; A. Kawakami, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 2, 5, 8, 9; M. Iwasaki, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 9; Y. W. Song, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 9; Y. H. Chen, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 9; M. Rokuda, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 3, 9; H. Izutsu, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 3, 9; S. Ushijima, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 3, 9; Y. Kaneko, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 3, 9; T. Shiomi, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 3, 9; E. Yamada, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 3, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Tanaka S, Kawakami A, Iwasaki M, Song YW, Chen YH, Rokuda M, Izutsu H, Ushijima S, Kaneko Y, Shiomi T, Yamada E. Efficacy and Safety of the Novel Oral Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitor, Peficitinib (ASP015K), in a Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study of Patients with RA Who Had an Inadequate Response to Dmards [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-the-novel-oral-janus-kinase-jak-inhibitor-peficitinib-asp015k-in-a-phase-3-double-blind-placebo-controlled-randomized-study-of-patients-with-ra-who-had-an-inadequate-re/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-the-novel-oral-janus-kinase-jak-inhibitor-peficitinib-asp015k-in-a-phase-3-double-blind-placebo-controlled-randomized-study-of-patients-with-ra-who-had-an-inadequate-re/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology