ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2730

Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab vs Placebo Among Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease

Paul Miller1, Arkadi Chines 2, Ben-Hur Albergaria 3, Evelien Gielen 4, Bente Langdahl 5, Akimitsu Miyauchi 6, Mark Vanderkelen 7, Cassandra Milmont 2, Judy Maddox 2 and Jonathan Adachi 8, 1Colorado Center for Bone Research at Panorama Orthopedics and Spine Center, Golden, CO, 2Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 3Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitória, Brazil, 4Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Aging, KU Leuven & Center for Metabolic Bone Diseases, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 5Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, 6Miyauchi Medical Center, Osaka, Japan, 7UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium, 8McMaster University and St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: bone density and treatment, Fracture risk, osteoporosis, Renal disease

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: 5T047: Plenary III (2727–2732)

Session Type: Plenary Session III

Session Time: 11:00AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Osteoporosis and renal insufficiency are coexisting disease states in a substantial proportion of postmenopausal women. Since bisphosphonates are generally contraindicated in patients with estimated GFR (eGFR) < 35 mL/min, it is important to evaluate other osteoporosis treatments in this setting. This post hoc analysis of the FRAME study assessed the efficacy and safety of romosozumab (Romo) vs placebo (Pbo) among patients with different levels of renal function.

Methods: FRAME enrolled 7,180 postmenopausal women with T-scores –2.5 to –3.5 at the total hip (TH) or femoral neck (FN). In the Pbo-controlled double-blind treatment phase, patients received Romo 210 mg or Pbo monthly for 12 months. Patients were grouped by baseline eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) normalized to body surface area, calculated using the MDRD study equation. Renal function was categorized as normal renal function (eGFR ≥ 90) or mild (eGFR 60–89 [chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 2]), moderate (eGFR 30–59 [CKD stage 3]), or severe (eGFR 15–29 [CKD stage 4]) renal insufficiency. The least squares mean % change from baseline in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (LS), TH, and FN; incidence of new vertebral fractures and adverse events; and CKD progression were assessed for each eGFR category at month 12.

Results: At baseline, most patients (88%) had mild or moderate renal insufficiency; 0.3% had severe renal insufficiency. In the overall patient population, the least squares mean % change (95% CI) from baseline in BMD (Romo vs Pbo) was 13.1% (12.8–13.3) vs 0.4% (0.2–0.5) for LS, 6.0% (5.9–6.2) vs 0.3% (0.1–0.4) for TH, and 5.5% (5.2–5.7) vs 0.3% (0.1–0.5) for FN. Changes in BMD were similar irrespective of baseline eGFR (Figure). Incidence of new vertebral fractures (Romo/Pbo) in patients with normal renal function, CKD 2, or CKD 3 was 0.5%/3.0%, 0.4%/1.5%, and 0.6%/2.1%, respectively. The overall incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events, and the incidence of positively adjudicated cardiovascular events were similar between treatment groups for all eGFR categories. One patient (CKD 2 at baseline) in the Romo group had grade 2 hypocalcemia. Mild-to-moderate calcium decrease occurred in 4 patients in the Pbo group and 13 patients in the Romo group. Most patients (approximately 80% in each group) had no changes from baseline eGFR category at the end of the 12-month period.

Conclusion: Romo increased BMD across eGFR subgroups vs Pbo, and the reduction in new vertebral fractures was not notably affected by eGFR level. Safety was also generally comparable among eGFR subgroups.


encore FRAME CKD Fig ACR 2019


Disclosure: P. Miller, Amgen, 2, 5, Radius Pharma, 2, 5, Alexion, 5; A. Chines, Amgen, 1, 3, Amgen Inc., 1, 3; B. Albergaria, Amgen, 2, 8, Merck & Co, 2, Novartis, 2, 8, Organon, 2, Radius, 2, Roche, 2, 8, Sanofi-Aventis, 2, 8, UCB, 2, 8, Eli Lilly, 8, Merck Sharp & Dohme, 8, Servier, 8; E. Gielen, UCB, 5, Takeda, 8; B. Langdahl, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Novo Nordisk, 2, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8; A. Miyauchi, None; M. Vanderkelen, UCB Pharma, 1, 3; C. Milmont, Amgen, 1, 3; J. Maddox, Amgen, 1, 3; J. Adachi, Abbvie, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Amgen Inc., 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, Lilly, 5, Pfizer, 2, UCB, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Miller P, Chines A, Albergaria B, Gielen E, Langdahl B, Miyauchi A, Vanderkelen M, Milmont C, Maddox J, Adachi J. Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab vs Placebo Among Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-romosozumab-vs-placebo-among-patients-with-mild-to-moderate-chronic-kidney-disease/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-romosozumab-vs-placebo-among-patients-with-mild-to-moderate-chronic-kidney-disease/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology