ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 696

Efficacy and Safety of Novel Targeted Synthetic DMARD and Biological DMARD in Active Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Network Meta-Analysis

Chenyang Lu1,2, Beth Wallace3,4,5, Wenyi Fu2,6 and Yi Liu1, 1Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, Chengdu, China, 2Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Autoimmunity Center of Excellence, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Ann Arbor, MI, 3VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Health Care System, Ann Arbor, MI, 4Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 5Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 6Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China, Shenyang, China

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: meta-analysis and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster I: Imaging, Clinical Studies, and Treatment

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Many targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD) and biological DMARD (bDMARD) were recently approved for treatment of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), but their comparative efficacy and safety remain unknown. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of recently generated tsDMARD and novel bDMARD in active PsA.

Methods:

Randomized clinical trials (RCT) evaluating the efficacy and safety of tsDMARD including tofacitinib (TOF) and apremilast (APR), and bDMARD such as ustekinumab (UST), secukinumab (SEC), ixekizumab (IXE), clazakizumab (CLA), and abatacept (ABA) for active PsA, who received a diagnosis of PsA at least 6 months previously, fulfilled the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis, and had active plaque psoriasis and active arthritis (¡Ý3 swollen and ¡Ý3 tender or painful joints) at screening, were identified by comprehensive systemic literature review. Pairwise meta-analysis and Network meta-analysis (NMA) using a random effects model were performed to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of attaining 20% or 50% improvement in ACR criteria (ACR20 or ACR50) and 75% improvement in psoriasis area and severity index (PASI75), any adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) across trials.

Results:

We deemed 15 RCT eligible, including 6004 participants and 17 treatments. For efficacy, pairwise meta-analysis showed that all treatments except CLA 200mg/25mg monthly were superior to placebo in achieving ACR20, all except CLA 200mg monthly and ABA 125mg weekly were superior in achieving ACR50, and TOF, APR 30/20mg twice daily, UST, SEC 300mg/150mg monthly and IXE were superior in achieving PASI75. For safety, TOF 10mg twice daily, APR 30mg/20mg twice daily, and IXE were more likely to have any AE, but no significant differences were seen for pooled SAE among the various treatments. NMA showed SEC 300mg monthly to be more efficacious in achieving ACR20 and ACR50, whereas UST 90mg 12 weekly had the highest efficacy in achieving PASI75. SEC 75mg monthly and UST 90mg 12 weekly had the lowest probability of pooled AE and SAE, respectively. Regarding the overall efficacy in both articular and cutaneous aspects and overall risk-benefit profile, SEC and UST ranked higher than other interventions.

Conclusion:

Secukinumab and Ustekinumab may be the safest and most efficacious (for arthritis and psoriasis, respectively) for active PsA among the new targeted synthetic and biological DMARD.

Figure 1: Clustered ranking plot for efficacy and safety

A screenshot of a computer Description generated with high confidence

Each color represents a group of treatments that belong to the same cluster. Treatments lying in the upper right corner are more effective or/and safer than the other treatments. (Efficacy= 50% ACR20 response and 50% PASI75 response; Safety= 50% AE and 50% SAE). QD: daily; BID: twice daily; QW: weekly; Q2W: every 2 weeks; Q4W: every 4 weeks; Q12W: every 12 weeks; PLA: placebo.


Disclosure: C. Lu, None; B. Wallace, None; W. Fu, None; Y. Liu, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lu C, Wallace B, Fu W, Liu Y. Efficacy and Safety of Novel Targeted Synthetic DMARD and Biological DMARD in Active Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Network Meta-Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-novel-targeted-synthetic-dmard-and-biological-dmard-in-active-psoriatic-arthritis-a-systematic-review-meta-analysis-and-network-meta-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-novel-targeted-synthetic-dmard-and-biological-dmard-in-active-psoriatic-arthritis-a-systematic-review-meta-analysis-and-network-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology