ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 947

Efficacy and Safety of NNC0114­0006, an Anti-IL-21 Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

Juan D. Cañete1, Piotr Leszczynski2, Rikke Riisbro3 and Klaus S. Frederiksen3, 1Arthritis Unit. Rheumatology Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 2Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Poznan Medical University, Poznan, Poland, 3Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease Activity, interleukins (IL), monoclonal antibodies, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and safety

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy II: Novel Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis - Early in Development

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

A phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NNC0114-0006 in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on background methotrexate (MTX) therapy.

Methods

Patients (N=62; 82% female) with RA (mean duration 6.9 years; 77% RF positive; 82% anti-CCP positive; mean DAS28-CRP 5.7) and on MTX (mean duration 3.9 years; mean dose 14.3 mg/week) were enrolled. Patients were randomised to i.v. NNC0114-0006 (12 mg/kg; n=41) or placebo (n=21); two doses given 6 weeks apart. The primary endpoint was change in DAS28-CRP from baseline to Week 12. ACR 20/50/70 and EULAR response at Week 12, adverse events (AEs), changes in laboratory safety measurements, antibodies against NNC0114-0006 (ADAs) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters were also evaluated.

Results

There were no significant differences between treatment groups with respect to baseline. Four patients in the NNC0114-0006 group withdrew (3 withdrew informed consent, 1 was lost to follow-up). A significant improvement in mean DAS28-CRP was observed with NNC0114-0006 versus placebo at Week 12 (–0.65, p=0.04; Fig. 1), due largely to reductions in swollen and tender joint counts. The reduction in DAS28-CRP at week 12 was supported by improved disease activity in terms of ACR20/50/70 and EULAR response, although these endpoints did not reach statistical significance. An expected increase in total (both free and antibody-bound) IL-21 levels after treatment with NNC0114-0006 was observed. While no change in absolute B cell numbers was observed at Week 1, about one third of patients treated with NNC0114-0006 had increased percentages of plasma cells, plasmablasts and short-lived plasmablasts, with decreased percentages of naïve B cells. They also showed increased transcript levels of Ig-Lambda light chain (IGLV7-43) and other plasma-cell signature genes in whole blood analysis. However, the DAS28-CRP response in these patients was comparable to placebo and those who did not exhibit this B cell alteration. Nevertheless, following treatment, DAS28-CRP and ACR-N outcomes appear to be related to baseline CTX-I – a marker of bone resporption – but not baseline DAS28-CRP. In NNC0114-0006-treated patients, 43 AEs were observed in 22/41 (54%) patients, while 24 AEs occurred in 11/21 (52%) placebo patients. Four serious AEs occurred in 3 placebo patients. A higher number of patients reported infections (24% vs 10%) and skin disorders (12% vs 5%) in the NNC0114-0006 group versus placebo. No treatment-related ADAs were detected. No clinically significant changes were observed in laboratory safety parameters.

Conclusion

Treatment with NNC0114-0006 significantly improved DAS28-CRP versus placebo at Week 12. Changes in B cell subsets detected at Week 1 may be due to altered distribution of homing of plasma cells/plasmablasts. No safety concerns were identified.

 

 


Disclosure:

J. D. Cañete,

Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Celgene, Schering Plough-MSD, Janssen-Cilag, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Abbott,

5;

P. Leszczynski,

Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, UCB, AbbVie, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Janssen, and Novartis,

5;

R. Riisbro,

Novo Nordisk,

3;

K. S. Frederiksen,

Novo Nordisk,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-nnc0114%c2%ad0006-an-anti-il-21-monoclonal-antibody-in-patients-with-active-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology