ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0865

Efficacy and Safety of Evobrutinib (M2951) in Adult Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Who Received Standard of Care Therapy: A Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Dose Ranging Study

Daniel J Wallace1, Thomas Dörner2, David Pisetsky3, F Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero4, Amy Kao5, Dana Parsons-Rich5, Anand Patel6, Yulia Zima5, Claire Le Bolay7, Karthinathan Thangavelu6 and Maria Dall'Era8, 1Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills, CA, 2DRFZ and Charité University Hospitals, Berlin, Germany, 3Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 4University Health Network/Sinai Health system, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5EMD Serono (a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Billerica, MA, 6EMD Serono (a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Billerica, 7Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, 8Division of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Randomized Trial, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: SLE – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) is involved in signalling pathways known to be important to the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Evobrutinib is a highly-selective, oral BTK inhibitor. This global Phase IIb randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy, dose response and safety of evobrutinib compared to placebo in adult patients with active autoantibody-positive SLE who received standard of care (SoC) therapy.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with SLE by the SLICC or ACR classification criteria ≥6 months before screening, who had a SLEDAI-2K total score ≥6 at screening, were autoantibody-positive, and on stable SLE SoC background therapy; were randomized 1:1:1:1 to oral evobrutinib 25 mg once-daily (QD), 75 mg QD, or 50 mg twice-daily (BID), or placebo. Active or severe central nervous system manifestations were exclusionary. The two primary endpoints were the SLE-Responder Index (SRI)-4 at Week 52 in all patients and the SRI-6 response at Week 52 in the subgroup of patients with High Disease Activity (defined as SLEDAI-2K total score ≥10 at screening). Primary safety endpoints included the incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and key secondary endpoints were SRI-4 response in the serologically active subgroup, defined as patients with positive anti-dsDNA antibodies and/or low complement levels at screening, and time to first new severe (BILAG A) flare during treatment.

Results: A total of 469 patients were randomized for the study’s primary analysis. Age at baseline was 40.7 years ±12.3 (mean ±SD) and 95% were female. Baseline disease characteristics were generally balanced across treatment groups. Median disease duration ranged from 51.6 to 69.2 months across treatment groups. Neither primary endpoints, SRI-4 response at Week 52 or SRI-6 response in patients with High Disease Activity, were met (Table). There was no clinically meaningful treatment difference for SRI-4 response in the serologically active subpopulation (Table). No treatment effect was observed for time to first severe flare. Serious adverse events were infrequently reported in all groups, 8.5% in placebo versus 9.4% in the evobrutinib groups combined. Infections and infestations were the most common treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), 42.7% for placebo versus 58.0% for evobrutinib groups combined. Overall, there was no dose effect in TEAEs or SAEs.

Conclusion: This Phase IIb dose-ranging study in SLE showed no treatment effect of evobrutinib versus placebo at any dose. Evobrutinib was well tolerated across the overall and high disease activity subgroup populations, and there was no dose effect observed for any adverse events. These results, combined with the negative results of the fenebrutinib SLE study, suggest that BTK inhibition is not an effective therapeutic intervention for patients with SLE.


Disclosure: D. Wallace, Exagen, 1, 2, Exagen, 1, 2; T. Dörner, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, Sanofi, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Abbvie, 2, 5, Celgene, 5, Pfizer Corporation, 2; D. Pisetsky, None; F. Sanchez-Guerrero, None; A. Kao, EMD Serono (a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), 1, 3; D. Parsons-Rich, EMD Serono, Inc. (a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), 1, 3; A. Patel, EMD Serono, 3; Y. Zima, EMD Serono, Inc. (a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), 3; C. Le Bolay, Merck Healthcare KGaA, 3; K. Thangavelu, EMD Serono, Inc. (a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), 3, 4; M. Dall'Era, Janssen, 5, AstraZeneca, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wallace D, Dörner T, Pisetsky D, Sanchez-Guerrero F, Kao A, Parsons-Rich D, Patel A, Zima Y, Le Bolay C, Thangavelu K, Dall'Era M. Efficacy and Safety of Evobrutinib (M2951) in Adult Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Who Received Standard of Care Therapy: A Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Dose Ranging Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-evobrutinib-m2951-in-adult-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-who-received-standard-of-care-therapy-a-phase-ii-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-dose-rang/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-evobrutinib-m2951-in-adult-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-who-received-standard-of-care-therapy-a-phase-ii-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-dose-rang/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology