ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2144

Efficacy and Safety of Different Dose Regimens of a Selective IL-23p19 Inhibitor (BI 655066) Compared with Ustekinumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis with and without Psoriatic Arthritis

Kim Papp1, Alan Menter2, Howard Sofen3, Stephen Tyring4, Jean-Philippe Lacour5, Beate Berner6, Nathan Bennett7, Stella Aslanyan7, Mary Flack7 and Paul Scholl7, 1Probity Clinical Research, Waterloo, ON, Canada, 2Baylor Research Institute, Dallas, TX, 3Dermatology Research Associates, Los Angeles, CA, 4Center for Clinical Studies, Houston, TX, 5Dermatology Department, Hôpital de L’Archet, Nice, France, 6Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany, 7Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ridgefield, CT

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: clinical trials, IL-23, monoclonal antibodies, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment:Treatment of PsA and SpA

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

 

Background/Purpose:
IL-23
is essential for the differentiation and maintenance of Th17 cells in psoriasis
and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We assessed the efficacy and safety of the humanized
IgG1 monoclonal antibody BI 655066, which selectively inhibits IL-23p19, compared with
ustekinumab, an IL-12/23 inhibitor, in
patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with and without concurrent
PsA.

Methods: In this
Phase 2 study (NCT02054481;
1311.02),
166 patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1 ratio) to receive subcutaneous
injections
of one of three dosage regimens of BI 655066 (18 mg single dose at Week 0; 90
or 180 mg at Weeks 0, 4, and 16), or ustekinumab (45 or 90 mg, based on weight,
at Weeks 0, 4, and 16). Skin lesions were assessed using the Psoriasis
Area and Severity Index (PASI) with the primary endpoint of PASI 90 (90%
improvement in PASI score from baseline) at Week 12. Pain was assessed by
visual analog scale (pain-VAS [0–100 mm]) at baseline (Week 0) and at Weeks 4,
12, and 24 in patients who had concurrent PsA. In this interim analysis, all
patients had completed the Week 24 visit.

Results: The
primary endpoint of PASI 90 response at Week 12 was achieved by 32.6% (14/43), 73.2%
(30/41), and 81.0% (34/42) of BI 655066 patients in the 18, 90, and 180 mg
groups, respectively, and 40.0% (16/40) of ustekinumab patients. A two-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
test of PASI 90 response at Week 12 between the 18, 90, and 180 mg groups of BI
655066, and ustekinumab, gave p-values of 0.4337, 0.0013, and <0.0001,
respectively. Among the 46 (27.7%) patients with PsA (either previously
diagnosed by rheumatologist [n=13] or suspected by investigator [n=33]), median
decreases from baseline in pain-VAS at Week 24 were 7.6%, 80.0%, and 86.5%, respectively,
for the BI 655066 18, 90, and 180 mg dose groups, compared with 77.6% for ustekinumab. The
criterion of >50% decrease
in pain-VAS (defined post hoc) at Week 24 was achieved in 16.7% (1/6), 81.8%
(9/11), and 90.9% (10/11) of patients in BI 655066 18, 90, and 180 mg dose groups,
respectively, compared with 57.1% (8/14) for ustekinumab. In the
BI 655066 90 and 180 mg dose arms the reductions in pain-VAS score were
observed as early as 4 weeks, and were highest at 24 weeks (Figure 1). AEs were similar
between treatment arms and there was no dose response relationship for any AE.
Seven patients reported serious AEs (four in the 18 mg and two in the 90 mg BI
655066 arms and one in the ustekinumab arm); all were considered unrelated to
study medication.

Conclusion: Selective
blockade of IL-23p19 with BI 655066, in the 90 mg and 180 mg arms, were associated
with PASI responses superior to ustekinumab in patients with
moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Treatment with BI 655066 or
ustekinumab was associated with numeric improvement in pain-VAS in patients
with diagnosed or suspected PsA. Further studies are needed to assess long-term
efficacy and safety of BI 655066 in both psoriasis and PsA.

 


Disclosure: K. Papp, None; A. Menter, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2,Boehringer Ingelheim, 5; H. Sofen, Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P., 2,Eli Lilly and Company, 2,Amgen, 2,Pfizer Inc, 2,Celgene, 2,Boehringer Ingelheim, 2,Eli Lilly and Company, 5,Pfizer Inc, 5,Boehringer Ingelheim, 5,Celgene, 8,Pfizer Inc, 8,Amgen, 8; S. Tyring, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2; J. P. Lacour, Boehringer Ingelheim, 1,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 1,Abbott Immunology Pharmaceuticals, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Amgen, 1,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 5,Eli Lilly and Company, 5,Amgen, 5; B. Berner, Boehringer Ingelheim, 3; N. Bennett, Boehringer Ingelheim, 3; S. Aslanyan, Boehringer Ingelheim, 3; M. Flack, Boehringer Ingelheim, 3; P. Scholl, Boehringer Ingelheim, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Papp K, Menter A, Sofen H, Tyring S, Lacour JP, Berner B, Bennett N, Aslanyan S, Flack M, Scholl P. Efficacy and Safety of Different Dose Regimens of a Selective IL-23p19 Inhibitor (BI 655066) Compared with Ustekinumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis with and without Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-different-dose-regimens-of-a-selective-il-23p19-inhibitor-bi-655066-compared-with-ustekinumab-in-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-plaque-psoriasis-with-and-without-psoriatic-a/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-different-dose-regimens-of-a-selective-il-23p19-inhibitor-bi-655066-compared-with-ustekinumab-in-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-plaque-psoriasis-with-and-without-psoriatic-a/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology