ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 684

Effects of Current Therapies for Lupus on Disease Activity and Renal Flares

Kenneth C. Kalunian1, Jill P. Buyon2, Cynthia Aranow3, Mary Anne Dooley4, Richard A. Furie5, Ellen M. Ginzler6, R. John Looney7, Joan T. Merrill8, Jerry McGwin9 and Bevra H. Hahn10, 1UCSD School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, 2Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 3The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, 4University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 5Division of Rheumatology and Allergy-Clinical Immunology, North Shore - Long Island Jewish Health System, Great Neck, NY, 6Rheumatology, SUNY-Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, 7Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 8Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 9Biostats, UAB, Birmingham, AL, 10Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine,, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease Activity and lupus nephritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment: Treatment and Management Studies

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: A paucity of data exists that delineates the effect of current medications for lupus on disease activity and the propensity for renal flares in these patients.

Methods: Data from a registry of SLE patients collected from 16 medical centers in the US and Canada in which patients are seen regularly to evaluate the association between specific medications and the incidence of renal flares over an average of 1.8 years of observation. The percentage of patients with low levels of disease activity (SLEDAI ≤ 4 ) at entry who maintained these same levels of low disease activity was calculated, as was the percentage of patients who entered at higher levels of disease activity (SELENA SLEDAI >4) but became inactive at 6 months and remained at that low level of disease activity during follow-up.

Results: Of the 1299 patients with any follow-up, 103 subjects were taking Azathioprine plus Hydroxychloroquine (AZA+HCQ), 312 were on Mycophenolate Mofetil  (MMF) plus HCQ, 111 were on MMF alone, 502 were on HCQ without other immunosuppressant drugs and 271 were on none of these medications.  Six-hundred and eleven had a history of renal disease at study entry; mean Prednisone dose did not significantly differ between the five medication groups and the SLEDAI score was significantly lower in the HCQ alone group.  The incidence of renal flares ranged from 14%-37% with the lowest incidence in the HCQ group, but no statistically significant differences were noted.  The incidence of severe renal flares varied from 7%-13% with the lowest in the MMF alone group and the highest in the MMF+HCQ group, though any differences were not statistically significant.  Among subjects with a history of nephritis, the incidence of severe renal flares did not differ between those who were using Prednisone at enrollment compared with those who were not. Logistic regression was used to identify significant, independent risk factors for renal flares; only older age and higher baseline SLEDAI scores were associated with severe renal flares, while race/ethnicity, disease duration, gender and medications were not.  Among patients who entered with low levels of disease activity (SLEDAI ≤ 4) and maintained these low levels of activity, the group using HCQ alone was significantly more likely to maintain low levels of disease activity (46% for HCQ group compared to 20%-27% for the other groups). 

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that over a period of almost two years, approximately one-third of SLE patients, even those with nephritis; can be maintained at a low level of disease activity with current maintenance therapies.  Over that period, approximately 1/3 of patients have renal flares and approximately 10% have severe renal flares.


Disclosure:

K. C. Kalunian,

Lupus Clinical Trials Consortium, Inc.,

2;

J. P. Buyon,
None;

C. Aranow,
None;

M. A. Dooley,
None;

R. A. Furie,

UCB Pharma,

5;

E. M. Ginzler,

Innovimmune Biotherapeutics Holding, LLC,

5;

R. J. Looney,
None;

J. T. Merrill,
None;

J. McGwin,
None;

B. H. Hahn,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effects-of-current-therapies-for-lupus-on-disease-activity-and-renal-flares/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology