ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0584

Effectiveness of Tofacitinib Monotherapy versus Combination Therapy in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from the CorEvitas Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondylarthritis Registry

Alexis Ogdie1, Nicole Middaugh2, Taylor Blachley2, Tran Bourgeois3, You-Li Ling4, Rajiv Mundayat4, Lara Fallon5, Karim Masri6 and Philip Mease7, 1Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, 3CorEvitas, Waltham, MA, 4Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, 5Pfizer Inc, Montreal, QC, Canada, 6Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, 7Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health; University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Disease Activity, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024

Title: SpA Including PsA – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Real-world (RW) data on the effectiveness of tofacitinib in patients (pts) with PsA are limited. This study summarized disease activity and pt‑reported outcome measures in pts with PsA initiating tofacitinib as monotherapy vs in combination with oral small molecules (OSMs) in a RW setting.

Methods: Pts with PsA enrolled in the CorEvitas PsA/SpA Registry who initiated tofacitinib either as monotherapy or in combination with OSMs (MTX, leflunomide, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, or apremilast) from December 2017-October 2023 were identified. Pts were included if a baseline and 6-month follow-up visit (with ±3-month window) were available. The proportions of pts at 6 months who remained on monotherapy/combination therapy, who discontinued, or who added an OSM treatment, were evaluated. Changes from baseline (∆) were measured at 6±3 months for: Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA), clinical DAPSA low disease activity (cDAPSA LDA), minimal disease activity (MDA), body surface area (BSA)=0%, and HAQ-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). For binary endpoints, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using normal approximation to binomial proportions were provided. Continuous endpoints at month 6 were analyzed as ∆ with an analysis of covariance model that included treatment and baseline value as covariates. Least squares (LS) means (standard error) and adjusted LS means/odds ratios (95% CI) are presented.

Results: In total, 141 pts initiated tofacitinib (66/141 as monotherapy; 75/141 as combination therapy). At baseline, 61.0% of pts were female, 94.3% were white, mean (standard deviation) age was 56.7 (11.3) years, and mean duration since PsA diagnosis was 8.7 years. More monotherapy users were OSM treatment-naïve and had higher mean Pt Global Assessment of Arthritis, compared with combination therapy users (Table 1). At 6±3 months, 71.2% of monotherapy initiators remained on tofacitinib, 28.8% discontinued tofacitinib, and 1.5% added an OSM treatment. Corresponding data for combination therapy users were 74.7%, 25.3%, and 2.7%, respectively; 26.7% of combination therapy initiators discontinued OSMs at/prior to 6 months (Table 2). Across treatment groups, improvements in many outcomes were observed at 6±3 months; there were no significant differences in LS means (Figure 1a). At 6±3 months, 31.3% of monotherapy initiators achieved cDAPSA LDA, 15.0% achieved MDA, and 27.1% had BSA=0%. Corresponding data for combination therapy users were 21.2%, 20.7%, and 22.0%, respectively (Figure 1b). Differences between groups were not significant.

Conclusion: In this RW population of pts with PsA who initiated tofacitinib, approximately half initiated as monotherapy. Both monotherapy and combination therapy users demonstrated improvements across effectiveness outcomes with no statistical differences after adjustment. This analysis illuminates the use of tofacitinib in a broad population of initiators and underscores its effectiveness both as monotherapy and in combination with other OSMs.

Acknowledgments: Study sponsored by Pfizer and registry by CorEvitas, LLC. Medical writing support provided by Caitlin Duncan, PhD, CMC Connect; funded by Pfizer.

Supporting image 1

Table 1

Supporting image 2

Table 2

Supporting image 3

Figure 1


Disclosures: A. Ogdie: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Celgene, 2, CorEvitas, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Gilead, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5, Happify Health, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB, 2; N. Middaugh: CorEvitas, LLC, 3; T. Blachley: CorEvitas, LLC, 3; T. Bourgeois: CorEvitas, LLC, 3; Y. Ling: Pfizer Inc, 3, 11; R. Mundayat: Pfizer Inc, 3, 11; L. Fallon: Pfizer Inc, 3; K. Masri: AbbVie, 3, Pfizer Inc (at the time of the study), 3, 11; P. Mease: AbbVie, 2, 5, Aclaris Therapeutics, 2, 5, Aclyrin, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, CorEvitas, 2, 5, Galápagos, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, 5, Inmagene, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ogdie A, Middaugh N, Blachley T, Bourgeois T, Ling Y, Mundayat R, Fallon L, Masri K, Mease P. Effectiveness of Tofacitinib Monotherapy versus Combination Therapy in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from the CorEvitas Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondylarthritis Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-tofacitinib-monotherapy-versus-combination-therapy-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-results-from-the-corevitas-psoriatic-arthritis-spondylarthritis-registry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-tofacitinib-monotherapy-versus-combination-therapy-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-results-from-the-corevitas-psoriatic-arthritis-spondylarthritis-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology