ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2347

Effectiveness of Shared Decision Making in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients at OSU

Juliette Yedimenko1, Paige Hackenberger2, Emily Sullivan3, Kelly Morris4 and Alexa Meara5, 1The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 2The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH, 3The Ohio State Univeristy Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 4Rheumatology and Immunology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 5Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: patient engagement, shared dicision making and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster II: Patient Perspectives

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patient autonomy is an integral part of the treatment process. For effective shared decision making (SDM) patients must fully understand their disease process, prognosis and treatment. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients have significant challenges due to the complex pathophysiology of the disease, multiple treatment regimens, and heterogeneous manifestations including neurocognitive effects. Our prior study demonstrated that one third of the SLE patients did not recognize comorbidities of SLE and medication side effects. The aim of our current study is to use CollaboRATE, a validated SDM tool, to investigate the effectiveness of the SDM process in a subset of SLE patients at OSU.

Methods: Patients >18 years were recruited from The Ohio State University Lupus and Vasculitis Glomerulonephritis Clinic. Patient demographics are described in Table 1. After IRB approval, patients were contacted by phone and administered a 3 item multiple-choice validated CollaboRATE questionnaire that was graded on a 5 point Likert scale (0-4) (Table 1). Data was analyzed as an average score per question and a total sum (max 12 points). A top score was obtained by giving 1 point to individuals who gave the maximum possible response to all 3 questions, and 0 points to everything else.

Results: A total of 52 patients completed the questionnaire. The average score for question 1 was 3.1(+/-1), question 2 was 3.3 (+/- 0.9), and question 3 was 3.1 (+/-1) (Table 2). Sixteen out of 52 patients received a max score of 12, and 30/52 patients scored at least a 10/12 (83%)

Conclusion:

The CollaboRATE questionnaire targets the areas of SDM including explanation of the health issues, determination of preferences, and healthcare usage. On average, our SLE cohort feel significant effort is made to help them understand their disease and include their values. Despite this, only about 57% of patients reported a high score (meaning high SDM effectiveness). Based on these results and the prior study by Meara et al, there remains an apparent gap regarding patient knowledge of SLE diagnosis and treatment, putting them at a disadvantage in SDM. This discrepancy may be due to multiple factors. Further studies are needed to investigate the best information delivery methods to improve knowledge in an effort to empower them in the SDM process.

Table 1: Demographic Information

Average age

46.9 +/- 13.5 years

Ethnicity

48% African American

44% Caucasian

2% Asian

2% Latino/Hispanic

2% Other

2% Refused to answer

Average duration of disease

12.9 +/- 8.9 years

Average SLICC

2.7 +/- 1.6

Average SLEDAI

2.6 +/- 3.4

CollaboRATE Questions

Scores +/- Standard Deviation (N=52)

How much effort was made to help you understand your health issues?

0

1

2

3

4

No effort was made

A little effort was made

Some effort was made

A lot of effort was made

Every effort was made

3.1(+/-1)

How much effort was made to listen to the things that matter most to you about your health issues?

0

1

2

3

4

No effort was made

A little effort was made

Some effort was made

A lot of effort was made

Every effort was made

3.3 (+/- 0.9)

How much effort was made to include what matters most to you in choosing what to do next?

0

1

2

3

4

No effort was made

A little effort was made

Some effort was made

A lot of effort was made

Every effort was made

3.1 (+/-1)

References: Meara A, Yedimenko J, Steigelman H, Ardoin SP, Peters E. “Do You Know What I Mean?” a Tool to Understand What Lupus Patients Comprehend [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10).

Barr PJ1, Thompson R, Walsh T, Grande SW, Ozanne EM, Elwyn G. The psychometric properties of CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of the shared decision-making process. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jan 3;16(1):e2


Disclosure: J. Yedimenko, None; P. Hackenberger, None; E. Sullivan, None; K. Morris, None; A. Meara, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Yedimenko J, Hackenberger P, Sullivan E, Morris K, Meara A. Effectiveness of Shared Decision Making in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients at OSU [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-shared-decision-making-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-patients-at-osu/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-shared-decision-making-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-patients-at-osu/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology