ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 141

Effectiveness of Prophylaxis with Anti-Gout Medications On Risk of Gout Attacks

Tuhina Neogi1, Clara Chen2, Jingbo Niu3, Christine E. Chaisson4, David J. Hunter5, Hyon Choi6 and Yuqing Zhang7, 1Clinical Epidemiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 2Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 3Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 4Arthritis Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 5Rheumatology, Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 6Section of Rheumatology and the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 7Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Colchicine, gout and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: While a few studies have examined colchicine’s ability to prevent gout attacks, NSAIDs have not been formally studied in this regard, despite use of naproxen and its apparent efficacy in the febuxostat trials. Little data are available on effectiveness of prophylaxis with anti-gout medications on risk of gout attacks as used in the community. Further, dosing and choice of NSAID type for prophylactic purposes may vary widely in the community. We evaluated the association of colchicine and NSAID use with risk of recurrent gout attacks in an internet-based cohort of persons with gout.

Methods: We conducted an internet-based case-crossover study (each person acts as his/her own control, eliminating the effect of time-invariant confounders) to assess risk factors for gout attacks among persons with pre-existing gout. Subjects with gout who had ≥1 attack in the prior year were recruited online from across the US, with their gout diagnosis verified through medical records review.  Participants logged onto the study website when they had a gout attack and provided exposure information (including medication use) over the 14-day period prior to the gout attack (case-period) using an online questionnaire. The same questionnaire was collected for a 14-d period during an intercritical period (control-period).  Medication use between 3-14 days was not collected in an earlier study period (’03-’07) and was imputed assuming the data was missing at random. We examined the relation of colchicine and NSAID use, respectively, over specific time spans (prior 1-2 days, 1-7 days, and 1-14 days) to the risk of gout attacks using conditional logistic regression.

Results:   Of the 724 participants (from 49 US states and D.C.) who experienced ≥1 gout attack during the study period, 78.5% were male, 89% were White, and 58% had a college education. 38.4% were on some form of ULT on study entry (majority on allopurinol 300mg/d). Colchicine was taken primarily as 0.6mg/d and the most common NSAID used was ibuprofen. Colchicine protected against gout attacks when taken consistently over a 14 day period, but not over shorter periods (Table). The increased risk of gout attacks when colchicine was used only in the prior 2 days (i.e., without having taken it in the prior 3-14 days) likely indicates its use in anticipation of an impending gout attack (confounding by indication). However, very few only took colchicine in the prior 1 or 2 days only, limiting its interpretability. NSAID use did not appear to protect against gout attacks, regardless of consistent use (Table).

Conclusion: Colchicine was effective in protecting against gout attacks when taken consistently; intermittent or short-term use did not confer protection. We cannot exclude the possibility that particular formulations and/or doses of NSAIDs are effective; nonetheless, as used in the community, NSAIDs were not associated with lower risk of gout attacks.

 

Table: Effect of consistent use of anti-gout prophylactic medication over a 2-week period

Time-Period over which

medication was taken**

Adjusted* ORs (95% CI)

Colchicine

NSAIDs

Taken daily  in prior 14 days

0.46 (0.30-0.69)

1.05 (0.75-1.46)

Taken daily in prior 7 days only

0.62 (0.17-2.24)

1.17 (0.53-2.58)

Taken in prior 1 or 2 days only

2.16 (1.28-3.65) †

1.11 (0.84-1.46)

Not taken at all in prior 14 days

1.0 (ref)

1.0 (ref)

 

*adjusted for diuretic and aspirin use, purine, alcohol, water and caffeine intake, use of the other prophylactic medication (NSAIDs or colchicine, as appropriate) and urate-lowering medications; Results were similar when limited to those who met ACR criteria for gout.

** Note: the majority of persons who used these medications in the prior 1-2 days also used the medication daily in the prior 3-14 days

†These results may reflect confounding by indication – those who are taking these medications only recently (i.e., without longer-term  use) may be doing so because of concern regarding risk of impending gout attack, or because they only recently started ULT; very few took the medication only in the prior 1 or 2 days only

 


Disclosure:

T. Neogi,
None;

C. Chen,
None;

J. Niu,
None;

C. E. Chaisson,
None;

D. J. Hunter,
None;

H. Choi,
None;

Y. Zhang,

URL,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-prophylaxis-with-anti-gout-medications-on-risk-of-gout-attacks/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology