ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1819

Effectiveness Of Pilates Method For The Treatment Of Chronic Mechanical Neck PAIN

Luciana A. Cazotti1, Anamaria Jones1, Diego Roger Silva2, Luiza H. C. Ribeiro1 and Jamil Natour3, 1Unifesp-EPM, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2Rheumatology Division, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 3Rheumatology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Cervical spine, exercise, functional status and pain

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rehabilitation Sciences

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: The neck pain comes from multifactorial origin and affects approximately 70% of individuals at some point in their lives being considered a frequent problem of disability. Pilates is a method of physical conditioning that has been widely used to improve posture and develop body sense. Although the symptoms of neck pain are common in the population, no study has investigated the effects of the Pilates method as a possible treatment for neck pain. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the Pilates method on pain, function and quality of life in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain.

Methods: Sixty-four patients with diagnosis of chronic mechanical neck pain for more than three months were selected to this study. Patients with symptoms of pain in the cervical spine, between the occipital and the first thoracic vertebra, both genres, age between 18 and 65 years were included. Patients with fibromyalgia, previous traumatic lesions in the spine, infections and inflammation in the spine, cervical pain radiating to upper limbs, patients that practice of physical activity started or altered in the last 3 months, visual deficiency not corrected by glasses, diseases of the central nervous system were excluded. The patients were randomized into two groups: Pilates and control. The Pilates group (PG) realizes the drug treatment and two sessions per week of Pilates for twelve weeks. The control group (CG) realizes the drug treatment and remained on the waiting list for Pilates. Regarding drug treatment both groups were instructed to use 750mg acetaminophen every 6 hours if there is pain. Both groups were assessed for pain (VAS), function (Neck Disability Index – NDI), quality of life (SF-36), acetaminophen consumption. The evaluations were made by a blinded assessor at baseline (T0), 45 days (T45), 90 days (T90) and 180 days (T180) after baseline. 

Results: Thirty-two patients were randomized to each group. The groups were homogeneous at baseline with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics, only the Body Mass Index (BMI) was not homogeneous among the groups (p = 0,023), with the GP showing higher BMI than the CG. The analysis between groups over time (ANOVA) show a statistical difference for pain (p <0,001), function (p <0,001) and quality of life [physical functioning (p = 0.019), pain (p <0,001), general health (p = 0,022), vitality (p <0.001), mental health (p = 0,012)] always with best results for the GP. Regarding medication GP consumed less analgesic than the CG (p = 0,037).    

Conclusion: we conclude that the Pilates method is effective for the treatment of chronic mechanical neck pain for relive pain; improve function and quality of life and reduce analgesic consumption.


Disclosure:

L. A. Cazotti,
None;

A. Jones,
None;

D. R. Silva,
None;

L. H. C. Ribeiro,
None;

J. Natour,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-pilates-method-for-the-treatment-of-chronic-mechanical-neck-pain/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology