ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2418

Effectiveness of Dose Spacing with Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis Treatment

Sharon Cowley1, Colm Kirby2, Patricia Harkins3, Richard Conway4, Grainne Murphy5 and David Kane6, 1Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, 2Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, 3St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, 4Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, 5Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland, 6Tallaght University Hospital & Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Biologicals, giant cell arteritis, Vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: (2387–2424) Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated & Related Disorders Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The only steroid sparing agent approved for treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) is the anti-interleukin-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab. There remains uncertainty regarding treatment duration of tocilizumab and the optimal approach to medication withdrawal.

Methods: Patients who met the 2022 ACR/EULAR GCA classification criteria with a clinical diagnosis of GCA were prospectively enrolled. As per ACR/ Vasculitis Foundation guidelines all patients with a new diagnosis of GCA were started on tocilizumab if there were no contraindications. All patients had a 26-week glucocorticoid taper as per the GiACTA protocol. Tocilizumab was administered weekly for the first 12 months, and then every-other-week for an additional 12 months. Relapse of disease on tocilizumab was managed with temporary increases in systemic glucocorticoids.

Results: 55 patients with newly-diagnosed GCA were included. Of these, 27 patients did not receive tocilizumab treatment for a variety of reasons; recent or active treatment for malignancy (7), history of diverticulitis (3), patient preference not to start (5), co-existing inflammatory condition for which other biologic treatment was preferred (1), patient frailty and/or recurrent infections (9), death before start of tocilizumab (1). 1 further patient only had one month of treatment before discontinuation for a drug reaction. 27 patients (49%) had weekly treatment with tocilizumab for 1 year. Of these only 17 had every second week tocilizumab at one year. 5 remained on a weekly dose due to previous visual loss and concern about preserving the remaining eye. 2 had other coexisting inflammatory diseases for which weekly dosing was required. 1 died of natural causes before dose spacing, and 2 stopped tocilizumab before spacing due to side effects. 27 patients had tocilizumab weekly for a mean of 15.7 months and 17 of had tocilizumab every-other-week at one year for a mean of 8.1 months. 2 patients (11.7%) had a major relapse on every-other-week tocilizumab (one aortic dissection and one with monocular visual loss). There were two minor relapses, one in the weekly dosing group and one in the two-weekly dosing group.

While on weekly tocilizumab, 1 patient had a minor infection treated in the community and 1 had a major infection (diverticulitis) requiring hospital admission. In the every-other-week tocilizumab group, two patient had minor infections treated in the community and no patient had a major infection requiring hospitalisation.

Conclusion: In a real-world prospective study cohort, only 49% (27/55) of patients were eligible for tocilizumab therapy (with GIACTA protocol steroid). 17/27 were eligible for dose reduction to every other week with 2/17 (11.7%) having major relapses of GCA at 24 months. In a real-life cohort tocilizumab therapy was only possible in 1 in 2 patients and when initiated was continued beyond the recommended period of 12 months in the majority of patients. Overall, 96% of patients in the weekly dosing group had relapse-free remission compared to 82% in the every-other-week treatment group. A dose reduction in tocilizumab after 12 months of weekly treatment maintained most patients in remission, had comparable safety outcomes and was cost effective.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1: Results


Disclosures: S. Cowley: None; C. Kirby: None; P. Harkins: Janssen, 5; R. Conway: AbbVie/Abbott, 5, 6, Celltrion, 5, Fresenius Kabi, 6, Galapagos, 6, Janssen, 5, 6, Nordic Pharma, 5, Novartis, 5, UCB, 6, Viatris, 6; G. Murphy: None; D. Kane: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Cowley S, Kirby C, Harkins P, Conway R, Murphy G, Kane D. Effectiveness of Dose Spacing with Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis Treatment [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-dose-spacing-with-tocilizumab-in-giant-cell-arteritis-treatment/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-dose-spacing-with-tocilizumab-in-giant-cell-arteritis-treatment/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology