ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 845

Effectiveness of Brief Group Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Follow-up

Emilia Sato1,2, Céu Conceiçao3, Ivone Meinão4 and Sergio Blay5, 1Rheumatology Division. Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2Rheumatology Div/Dept of Med, Escola Paulista de Medicina - Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 3Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 4Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 5Psychiatry, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Coping skills, depression, psychological status, Quality of life and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: ARHP Psychosocial Impact on Rheumatic Disease

Session Type: ARHP Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: There are few studies evaluating the effectiveness of psychotherapy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of brief group psychoanalytic psychotherapy (BGPP) in improving quality of life, anxiety and depression levels and coping strategies in SLE. Methods: Prospective, randomized clinical trial (number NCT01840709), including 80 SLE patients in a tertiary hospital. Patients were randomized into two groups: therapy (TG n=37) and control (CG n=43). Both groups received standard clinical treatment. TG received BGPP, weekly for 20 consecutive weeks performed by a specialized psychologist. CG remained in the waiting list. Assessments: at baseline (T1), after 20th weeks (T2), and 24 months after the end of the study (T3).  Damage and disease activity were assessed by SLICC/ACR-DI score and SLEDAI-2k score, respectively. Self-administered questionnaires supervised by a blind evaluator were used to evaluate symptoms (SLE-SSC), quality of life (SLEQOL), anxiety and depression (HAD) and coping strategies (CIS). Inclusion criteria: female gender; SLE (ACR-1997 classification criteria), age ≥ 18 years, minimum follow-up of six months and signing consent form approved by Institutional Ethic Committee. Exclusion criteria: illiterate patients, physical and mental comorbidities that preclude the attendance, and external psychological treatment. Statistical analysis: intent to treat analysis. Comparisons of variance between groups over time (ANOVA repeated measures). SPSS version 17.  p <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: At baseline, TG and CG were homogeneous in all variables, including medication. In T2, TG showed significant improvement in the majority of domains of SLEQOL (Table 1), all domains of HAD (Table 2) and several domains of CIS (Table 3). Some of benefits were maintained at the 24-month follow-up after the end of the therapy, including the most appropriate coping strategies to face the disease. No significant differences were observed in medication and clinical variables.

Conclusion: This study showed effectiveness of BGPP in improving quality of life, depression, anxiety and coping strategies to deal with stress in SLE patients, and some of the benefits were maintained in a long follow-up.

 

 


Disclosure: E. Sato, None; C. Conceiçao, None; I. Meinão, None; S. Blay, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sato E, Conceiçao C, Meinão I, Blay S. Effectiveness of Brief Group Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Follow-up [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-brief-group-psychoanalytic-psychotherapy-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-follow-up/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-brief-group-psychoanalytic-psychotherapy-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-follow-up/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology