ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2447

Effectiveness and Tolerability of Benepali in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Switched from Enbrel

Sarah Dyball1, Victoria Hoskins2, Sharon Christy-Kilner2 and Sahena Haque3, 1Rheumatology, University Hospitals of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2University Hospitals of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, 3Rheumatology department, University Hospitals of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Biologic agents, biosimilars, etanercept and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster III: Efficacy and Safety of Originator Biologics and Biosimilars

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Benepali, the etanercept biosimilar, is licenced in the UK for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and costs less than Enbrel. This study aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and tolerance of Benepali in RA patients that were switched from Enbrel.

Methods: A retrospective observational study design. Data collected from 38 patients with RA who had previously been established on Enbrel and were switched to Benepali with unchanged dosing regimens.  Patient’s baseline characteristics, DAS-28, CRP, tender joints, swollen joints and global scores were collected before and after the switch from hospital records at a single centre.

Variables were analysed using the Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement on the estimated mean bias between paired measurements ± 1.96SD. Student’s paired t-test was used to assess the significance of the mean difference.

Results: Patients had a mean age of 59.3 years, 69% were female and 88.5% were seropositive. There were 9/39 that had used a biologic prior to Enbrel.

Table 1: Markers of disease activity in Enbrel and Benepali

 

Enbrel average

Benepali average

Mean difference

P-value

DAS-28 (n=38)

3.08

3.42

+0.35

0.06

CRP (n=38)

7.00

6.95

-0.05

0.98

Tender joints (n=38)

3.10

3.84

+0.74

0.15

Swollen joints (n=38)

1.26

1.5

+0.24

0.54

Patient global health (n=38)

38.6

49.6

+11

0.05

The mean difference in DAS-28, CRP, tender and swollen joints is not statistically significant (Table 1). There was an average increased global score of 11/100 (p=0.05) with Benepali. This suggests that the more objective scores were less likely to be affected by the switch to Benepali.

Bland-Altman analysis (Figure 1) shows wide limits of agreement (-1.86 to 2.56), with a small mean difference of 0.348 (95% CI -0.01, 0.71) in DAS-28 scores. This suggests that although majority of patients did not have a significant variation in their DAS-28, there were a number of patients that did significantly better or worse on the Benepali.

Benepali was discontinued 17% of patients (6/36); 4 stopped due to ineffectiveness (all of which were switched back to Enbrel) and 2 stopped due to adverse drug reactions (1 patient developed injection site reactions and switched back to Enbrel, and the other patient developed a rash and had a significant fall in neutrophils and was re-challenged with Benepali).

Conclusion: In this RA clinical cohort, objective measures of disease activity were not statistically different for Benepali compared with Enbrel. The switch to Benepali resulted in a drug cost saving of £26400 per annum.

 


Disclosure: S. Dyball, None; V. Hoskins, None; S. Christy-Kilner, None; S. Haque, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dyball S, Hoskins V, Christy-Kilner S, Haque S. Effectiveness and Tolerability of Benepali in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Switched from Enbrel [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-and-tolerability-of-benepali-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-switched-from-enbrel/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-and-tolerability-of-benepali-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-switched-from-enbrel/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology