ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2467

Effectiveness and Safety of Tocilizumab in Biologics Naïve RA Patients – Interim Analysis of PMS for Investigating Success in Achieving Clinical and Functional Remission and Sustaining Efficacy with Tocilizumab in Biologics-Naïve RA Patients Study

Naoki Ishiguro1, Tatsuya Atsumi2, Masayoshi Harigai3, Tsuneyo Mimori4, Norihiro Nishimoto5, Takayuki Sumida6, Tsutomu Takeuchi7, Yoshiya Tanaka8, Nobuhiro Takagi9, Kunihiko Tanaka10 and Hisashi Yamanaka11, 1Orthopaedic Surgery and Rheumatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan, 2Medicine II School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, 3Department of Pharmacovigilance, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan, 4Dept of Rheum & Clinical Immunology, Kyoto Univ Grad Schl of Med, Kyoto, Japan, 5Department of Molecular Regulation for Intractable Diseases, Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo Medical University, Osaka, Japan, 6Dept Internal Medicine, Univ of Tsukuba/Inst Clin Med, Tsukuba City, Japan, 7Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan, 8First Dept of Internal Med, U Occupa & Environ Hlth, Kitakyushu, Japan, 9Medical Science, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan, 10Pharmacovigilance, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan, 11Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologics, methotrexate (MTX), remission and tocilizumab

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Therapeutic Strategies, Biomarkers and Predictors of Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:  The all-patient PMS study of tocilizumab (TCZ) followed 7901 RA patients for 28 wks. That study (hereafter, PMS7901) showed patients with a high probability of remission and a low probability of developing serious infection to be those most likely to have early and less advanced RA and to have not received biologics previously. The FIRST Bio study is designed to investigate effectiveness and safety of TCZ in RA patients who had not received any biologics (i.e. bio-naïve) in a real clinical setting.

Methods: FIRST Bio is a 52-wk observational postmarketing surveillance study which enrolled bio-naïve RA patients who met the ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria for RA, experienced inadequate response or were intolerant to one or more DMARDs, and had DAS28-ESR > 3.2. Patients received 8 mg/kg TCZ every 4 wks intravenously with or without DMARDs at the investigators’ discretion. Patient characteristics and safety and effectiveness data were collected. This interim analysis reports the results of 24 wks’ observation. A paired t-test was used to detect statistically significant differences in disease activity (CDAI, DAS28-ESR) and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score compared to baseline.

Results:  This report analyzes 551 of 855 patients enrolled. Mean disease duration and percentage of patients who had less advanced Steinbrocker’s stage and class and had comorbidities were lower in the FIRST Bio study than in PMS7901 (Table 1). At Wk 24, 87.2% of patients were continuing TCZ treatment. Mean CDAI improved from 23.4 at baseline to 7.5 at Wk 24 (p < 0.0001). DAS28-ESR also improved from 5.2 at baseline to 2.2 at Wk 24 (p < 0.0001). At Wk 24, rate of CDAI remission (CDAI ≤ 2.8) was 30.9%, DAS28-ESR remission (DAS28-ESR < 2.6) was 66.5%, and Boolean remission was 27.8%. The Boolean remission rate in the FIRST Bio study was almost twice that in PMS7901 (15.1%) (Table 2). The mean HAQ score improved from 1.0 at baseline to 0.5 at Wk 24 (p < 0.0001), and in 59.8% of patients the HAQ score decreased to <0.5 (i.e. HAQ remission). The incidence rates of total and serious AEs were 25.2% and 6.4%, respectively. Infections were the most frequent AEs (6.4%) and the most frequent serious AEs (2.0%). Malignancies were reported in 2 patients (0.4%). Gastrointestinal disorders were reported in 19 patients (3.4%), including 1 (0.2%) gastrointestinal tract perforation. One patient died (0.2%). The incidence rates of serious AEs and serious infections were lower in the FIRST Bio study than in PMS7901 (Table 2). Mean dose of concomitant MTX decreased from 9.1 mg/wk at baseline to 7.3 mg/wk at Wk 24. Mean dose of concomitant corticosteroid also decreased from 5.7 mg/day at baseline to 3.6 mg/day at Wk 24.

Conclusion:  The FIRST Bio study revealed that in the real clinical setting TCZ showed high effectiveness and safety in those patients who have less advanced RA and who have not previously received biologics.

 

Table 1.  Patient background

FIRST Bio study

PMS7901

Mean age (SD), years

59.4 (13.7)

58.7 (12.9)

Mean disease duration (SD), years

7.2 (8.7)

10.4 (9.2)

% of patients (pts) whose Steinbrocker’s stage was I or II

63.5

35.2

% of pts whose Steinbrocker’s class was 1 or 2

81.5

73.8

% of pts who had any comorbidities (% of pts who had respiratory disease as comorbidity)

56.8 (11.3)

70.6 (14.5)

% of pts with prior use of biologics

0

62.8

% of pts with concomitant use of MTX (mean dose in pts using MTX)

60.8 (9.1mg/wk)

55.8 (7.0mg/wk)

% of pts with concomitant use of corticosteroids (mean dose in pts using corticosteroids)

55.4 (5.7mg/day)

74.0 (5.3mg/day)

 

 

 

 Table 2. Comparing safety and effectiveness

 FIRST Bio study

At Wk 24

 PMS7901

At Wk 28

 Boolean remission rate, %

 27.8

 15.1

 Incidence rate of AEs (serious AEs), %

 25.2 (6.4)

 43.9 (9.6)

 Incidence rate of infections (serious infections), %

 6.4 (2.0)

 11.0 (3.7)


Disclosure:

N. Ishiguro,

AbbVie, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Pfizer and Takeda.,

5,

AbbVie, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Pfizer and Takeda.,

8;

T. Atsumi,

Astellas, Bistol-Myers Squibb, Chugai and Mitsubishi Tanabe.,

8;

M. Harigai,

AbbVie, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Santen, Takeda and UCB.,

2,

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai and Janssen.,

5,

AbbVie, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eisai, Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Ono, Santen, Takeda, UCB and Pfizer.,

8;

T. Mimori,

Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe,�Nippon Kayaku, Santen and Takeda.,

2,

Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Mitsubishi Tanabe and Taisho Toyama.,

8;

N. Nishimoto,

Chugai, Bristol–Myers Squibb and Eisai,

2,

Chugai and Roche.,

5;

T. Sumida,

Chugai.,

5,

Chugai.,

8;

T. Takeuchi,

AbbVie, Asahi Kasei, Asahi Kasei Medical, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bistol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Pfizer, Santen, SymBio, Takeda, Taishyo Toyama and Teijin.,

5,

AbbVie, Asahi Kasei, Asahi Kasei Medical, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bistol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Pfizer, Santen, SymBio, Takeda, Taishyo Toyama and Teijin.,

8;

Y. Tanaka,

Abbvie, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eisai, Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe and MSD.,

5,

Abbvie, Actelion, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Nippon Kayaku, Ono, Otsuka, Pfizer, Quintiles, Santen and UCB.,

8;

N. Takagi,

Chugai,

3;

K. Tanaka,

Chugai,

3;

H. Yamanaka,

AbbVie, Astellas, Bistol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Takeda, Teijin and UCB.,

5,

AbbVie, Astellas, Bistol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Takeda, Teijin and UCB.,

8.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-and-safety-of-tocilizumab-in-biologics-naa%c2%afve-ra-patients-interim-analysis-of-pms-for-investigating-success-in-achieving-clinical-and-functional-remission-and-sustaining-eff/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology