ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 566

Effect of TNF Antagonists On Radiographic Progression in Psoriatic Arthritis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Radjiv Goulabchand1, Gael Mouterde1, Cédric Lukas2, Thomas Barnetche3, Jacques Morel1 and Bernard Combe1, 1Rheumatology, Montpellier 1 University, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier, France, 2Immuno-Rhumatologie, Hopital Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France, 3Rheumatology, CHU Bordeaux Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: DMARDs, methotrexate (MTX), psoriatic arthritis and radiography

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Aspects and Treatment

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) can cause important structural damages which can lead to disability. TNF antagonists have shown their clinical efficacy in PsA, but only limited data are available regarding their structural effect.

To determine whether TNF antagonists have an effect on radiographic progression in patients with PsA by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis based on data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) versus placebo. To evaluate whether the combination with methotrexate (MTX) has an additional efficacy over monotherapy.

Methods:

A systematic review of literature was performed until March 2011. Bibliographic references were selected from Embase and Medline databases, and from the two last EULAR and ACR annual meetings. Radiographic progression was scored by Sharp method modified for PsA (mTSS). Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients showing no radiographic progression at week 24 (defined by a mTSS variation score ≤ 0.5). Secondary end point included the proportion of non progressors at week 48 and mean variation of mTSS at week 24. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to provide a common odds-ratio (OR) estimate and 95% confidence interval (CI) in TNF antagonists (+/- DMARDs) versus placebo (+/- DMARDs)  treated patients for infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab and golimumab RCTs. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by the Q test (χ²), using a significance level of 0.05. OR and 95% CI were shown on forest plots.

Results:

Search found out 206 articles and 3 abstracts. Retrieved data allowed meta-analysis on 4 articles and 1 abstract for the proportion of non progressors at week 24. Data from 1110 patients were pooled, 484/584 (82,9%) were considered as non-progressors at week 24 in the TNF antagonists group versus 362/526 (68,8%) in the placebo group (OR=2.68 [1.99 ; 3.60] p<0.0001), without significant heterogeneity (I²=3%;p=0.39) (figure 1). Based on 3 studies, similar results were found at week 48 in favor of TNF antagonists group (OR=2.42 [1.57;3.71] I²=0%;p=0.91). Among 533 patients receiving TNF antagonists versus 454 receiving placebo in 3 studies (4 comparisons), the mean change of the mTSS at week 24 was lower in the TNF antagonist group versus placebo (mean difference= -0,69 [-1.12 ; -0.27], with substantial heterogeneity (I²=76%;p=0.006). Only two RCTs provided data on the combination with MTX: the mean or median change of the mTSS was similar in adalimumab or infliximab subgroups, irrespective of the MTX use. 

Conclusion:

This meta-analysis of RCTs showed that all TNF antagonists lead to a better control of structural damage due to PsA than a placebo after 24 and 48 weeks of treatment. The respective role of the  additional DMARDS could not be determined due to a lack of data.


Disclosure:

R. Goulabchand,
None;

G. Mouterde,
None;

C. Lukas,
None;

T. Barnetche,
None;

J. Morel,
None;

B. Combe,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-tnf-antagonists-on-radiographic-progression-in-psoriatic-arthritis-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis-of-randomized-controlled-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology