ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 469

Effect of Patient Involvement in Treatment Decision Making on Disease Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis in the USA

Richard Hutchings1, Shailja Panchal2 and Elizabeth Baynton1, 1Ipsos Healthcare, London, United Kingdom, 2Ipsos Healthcare, New York, NY

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: outcomes and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects Poster I: Treatment Patterns and Response

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: ACR guidelines for treating Rheumatoid Arthritis (2015) suggest that treatment decisions should be made by physicians and patients through a shared decision-making process taking into account patients’ values, preferences, and comorbidities. Identifying the impact of patient involvement on disease outcomes in biologic patients would provide further evidence which could support ACR guideline recommendations and be used to inform optimal disease management.

Methods: A multi-center medical chart review study of patients with RA was conducted in Q4 2016 among physicians in hospitals and private practices to collect de-identified data on patients who were recently treated with a biologic as part of usual care in the USA. Physicians were screened for duration of practice (3-30yrs) and patient volume (≥2 RA biologic patients/week) and recruited from a large access panel to be geographically representative of the country. Eligible patient charts (≥5) were randomly selected from among the patients visiting each center/practice during the screening period. Physicians abstracted date of diagnosis, treatment patterns/dynamics, and symptomatology/disease status. Physicians identified the level of patient involvement in treatment decision making using a 7 point scale, and patient records were segmented into low-medium involvement (1-4/7) and high involvement (5-7/7). Sites waived local ethics review owing to collection of retrospective de-identified data. High involvement versus low involvement patients were compared using descriptive statistics.

Results: 517 biologic RA patients were assessed; overall, Highly involved: 409 (79%), Low-mid involved: 108 (21%). Patient characteristics (Highly involved/Low-mid involved) included: age (in years) 50/54; full time employment status 57%/42%; co-existing conditions: obesity (14%/28%), dyslipidemia (19%/33%), depression (19%/28%), none (45%/24%). Time since diagnosis (in months): 52.2/48.3. Among patients with available data, current lab measures included: ESR(mm/h) 20.3/24.0; CRP(mg/l) 2.8/3.8; rheumatoid factor(positive) 89%/84%; anti-CCP(positive) 80%/72%; measures of disease severity included: disease severity per physician judgment: mild (72%/53%), moderate (25%/40%), severe (3%/7%); disease under control 80%/69%; remission 63%/52%; mean DAS 28 2.7/3.2; mean tender joint count 3.4/3.6; mean swollen joint count 2.3/2.4.

Conclusion: In this cohort of RA patients in the USA, majority of patients with high involvement were seen to be younger, healthier patients who were full time employees. These patients were significantly more likely to be considered as mild disease severity (physician judgement) with a higher proportion in remission. Lab measures indicated lower disease burden with low hematology scores for highly involved patients. Further investigation of the influence of socioeconomic status, insurance type, and other demographics on patient involvement in treatment may warrant further research.


Disclosure: R. Hutchings, None; S. Panchal, None; E. Baynton, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hutchings R, Panchal S, Baynton E. Effect of Patient Involvement in Treatment Decision Making on Disease Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis in the USA [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-patient-involvement-in-treatment-decision-making-on-disease-outcomes-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-in-the-usa/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-patient-involvement-in-treatment-decision-making-on-disease-outcomes-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-in-the-usa/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology